Showing posts with label superstition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label superstition. Show all posts

Monday, 27 April 2015

26 April 2015 - Suleiman* Magic and the Jinn

26 April 2015 - Suleiman* Magic and the Jinn


Summary: Suleiman* Magic and the Jinn

Seeking magic or superstition is an old human practice. It is sometimes defined as deception by showing something to people which is contrary to reality. This is only deception on the eyes (illusion) not real power. Claims that people can now somehow seek the help of demons to perform something harmful against somebody needs proof that contradicts what is explicit in the Qur’an. The reality is:
  • The Jinn are from the matters of the unseen; we cannot see them but are real and believed in through textual proofs and not rational ones..
  • The foundation or origin of our relationship with them is that they are able to whisper to us and entice us [waswasa].
  • The Shayateen do not have a compelling authority over man, except if man chooses to follow the Shaytaan of his own free will.
  • Any material relationship other than this fundamental relationship which Allah has clarified requires a particular text establishing it. If a text exists explaining any such relationship then we affirm it in accordance with that text.
  • The Messenger of Allah (saw) would treat any material occurrence as a human matter, so long as no revelation came establishing that the Jinn had a relation to the matter. All matters were in origin taken as human affairs.
  • Hence so long as a text mentioning a material relationship regarding any given incident is not found, the relationship between Jinn and man remains limited to whispering and incitement.

Thus, if a physical event occurs one looks for a physical cause for such an event as a default position. Hence, Islam considers pursuing magic to be an act of blasphemy as it seeks power from other than Allah. Thus Allah says: "Suleiman* did not disbelieve, but the devils disbelieved…" (2:102)
In an authentic hadith the Prophet* said: Whoever goes to a fortune teller (a soothe sayer) or a diviner and believes him, has, in fact, disbelieved in what has been revealed to Muhammad.
So, the noble Suleiman* had control over the Jinn (who do not know the unseen) and he was neither controlled nor guided by the Jinn, he did not do magic nor became a non-believer.



Lives of the Prophets: Jinns and Suleiman*
Although Suleiman* was the Prophet and Messenger of God, he was accused by some of his opponents to be practicing magic. Those who claimed this could not distinguish between magic and miracles. All messengers of God were granted miracles as a proof of their authenticity. To name only a few: Moses was granted the staff by which he could divide the sea and make water gush from rocks. Abraham was flung in the middle of a huge raging fire, which Allah made cool and peaceful to him. Jesus Christ could heal the blind and the leper and bring back the dead to life.

If we contemplate these acts we find that miracles are totally different from magic. When these divine miracles are rejected other miracles are imposed to inflict severe punishments on rejecters. On the other hand, miracles are real while magic is sometimes deceptive.

Suleiman*'s public work was largely carried out by the Jinns. This was a punishment for their sins of making people believe that they were all-powerful, knew the unseen, and could foresee the future. As a prophet, it was Suleiman*'s duty to remove such false beliefs from his followers.
There were and remain many rumours and propaganda against the noble Prophet Suleiman* with some people (non-Muslims) claiming that Prophet Suleiman was taught by Jinn, or was controlled by the Jinn (demons) or that he was instructed by chief demons and delved into Magic / Black Magic as a consequence – then gaining the anger of God and becoming a disbeliever (may Allah Protect us from such slander). Allah addresses these issues and clears the reputation of Suleiman* in the Qur’an:
"And when there came to them a Messenger from Allah confirming what was with them, a party of those who were given the scripture threw away the book of Allah behind their backs as if they did not know. And they followed what the devils gave out falsely of magic of the reign of Suleiman*; for Suleiman* did not disbelieve but the devils disbelieved, teaching men magic and such things that came down at Babylon to the two angels Harut and Marut, but neither of these two (angles) taught anyone (such things) until they had said: we are only for trial, so don't disbelieve. And from them people learn that through which they would cause separation between a person and his spouse, but they could not thus harm anyone except by Allah's leave; and they learn that which harms them rather than profits them. And indeed they knew that its practitioner would have no share in the Hereafter. And how bad indeed was that for which they sold their own selves if they but knew" (2:101-2).

Hence, we know that Suleiman* controlled the Jinn (not the other way around) and opposed those that delved into Magic and was not involved in magic himself (as that leads to dis-belief = becoming a non-Muslim if you seek magic).

And He, the Exalted, says, “And (We made) the wind (subservient) to Suleiman, which made a month's journey in the morning and a month's journey in the evening, and We made a fountain of molten copper to flow out for him, and of the jinn there were those who worked before him by the command of his Lord; and whoever turned aside from Our command from among them, We made him taste of the punishment of burning. They made for him what he pleased of fortresses and images, and bowls (large) as watering-troughs and cooking-pots that will not move from their place; give thanks, O family of Dawud! and very few of My servants are grateful.” (Saba’: 12)

Some scholars have explained that Suleiman* was given the task of controlling the Jinn and banishing magic and those people that sought to do magic. As part of this he gathered up all the so-called manuals on magic and killed all magicians and buried the manuals under his throne. Only after he died did Shaytan whisper to people to check under his throne and when they found he manuals Shaytan spread the rumour that the source of his power was not Allah but the magic. Hence people confused magic with the miracles. That is why many magicians and secret orders try to trace their legitimacy back to Suleiman*.

Allah also clarifies that the source of apparent magic can be traced back to Babylon – specifically the story of Harut and Marut

The story of Harut and Marut
The meaning of these verses is unclear and so there are a few interpretations of the story. The weakest version (likely to be untrue) is that the angels [who do not possess free will and cannot sin] had become astonished at the acts of disobedience committed by the human beings on earth. They began to curse the humans, and could not understand how they could be so sinful. Allah informed the angels that they would have also sinned if they were in the position of human beings. So the angels elected Harut and Marut from amongst themselves and God gave them human attributes and sent them to earth after commanding them to avoid wine, idolatry, fornication and murder. Harut and Marut eventually succumbed to their human lusts and fell into all of these sins. Consequently, God punished them for their transgressions.

Other scholars feel that it is more likely that Harut and Marut were teaching magic for educational purposes, so that the people could recognize its symptoms, properties and effects and avoid it. The reason the two of them were sent down was to teach people what magic was so that they would know the difference between magic and prophethood, and therefore that Suleiman* was not a magician. It was to ensure complete understanding. They did not, in any case, teach anyone magic until they had first cautioned him saying to him, "We are merely a temptation and a trial and a test, so do not become unbelievers by teaching it and using it."

Other scholars said that Harut and Marut were two angels sent by Allah to test the people of Babylon with what appears to be magic or illusion, and these angels were only acting upon the order of Allah and committed no sin, nor even the slightest error. However, they differ as to the nature of the test. They were testing people's faith, for a purpose that has not been identified. The Qur'an exonerates the two angels, confirming that they had explained the nature of their work to the people and given them fair warning, nevertheless, some people persisted with learning this sorcery, thus falling to temptation and causing harm to themselves by becoming non-believers.

Given the differing interpretations there is no clear unambiguous proof of the existence of magic nowadays based upon these verses or of any supernatural powers that people or secret societies claim to possess. What is clear from the verses is that people who seek this knowledge or power are committing disbelief (Kufr) and that Suleiman* was a noble Prophet of Allah. Allah clear him of the false propaganda and claims associated with him.

Suleiman*'s Death
Allah uses the death of Prophet Suleiman* to also dispel myths and propaganda – clearly stating that the Jinn had no control over the Prophet and the Jinn clearly do not know the unseen.

Suleiman* lived amidst glory, and all creatures were subjected to him. Then Allah the Exalted ordained for him to die. His life and death were full of wonders and miracles; thus, his death harmonized with his life and glory. His death, like his life, was unique. The people had to learn that the future is known neither by the Jinns, nor by the prophets, but by Allah alone. Suleiman*'s effort in this direction did not end with his life, for even his death became an example. He was sitting holding his staff, overseeing the Jinns at work. He died sitting in this position. For a long time no one was aware of his death, for he was seen sitting erect. The Jinns continued with their hard toil, thinking that Suleiman* was watching over them.

Many days later, a hungry ant began nibbling Suleiman*'s staff. It continued to do so, eating the lower part of the staff, until it fell out of Suleiman*'s hand, and his great body fell to the ground. People hurried to him, realizing that he had died a long time ago and that the Jinns did not perceive the unseen, for had the Jinns known the unseen, they would not have kept working, thinking that Suleiman* was alive.

Allah revealed:"And We caused a fount of molten brass to flow for him, and there were Jinns that worked in front of him by the Leave of his Lord, and whosoever of them turned aside from Our Command, We shall cause him to taste of the torment of the blazing Fire. They worked for him what he desired, (making) high rooms, images, basins as large as reservoirs, and (making) cauldrons fixed (in their places). "Work you, O family of David, with thanks!" But few of My slaves are grateful. Then when we decreed death for him (Suleiman*), nothing informed them (Jinns) of his death except a little worm of the earth, which kept slowly gnawing away at his stick, so when he fell down, the Jinns saw clearly that if they had known the unseen, they would not have stayed in the humiliating torment. (TMQ 34:12-14).


Main Topic: The Reality of Jinn and Human-Being interaction

What is the actual relationship, in this current age and time, between humans and jinn-kind – as there are a lot of rumours about people being possessed by jinn, or people talking to jinn or even some people claim even get married to jinn! This issue links back to the rumours and propaganda against the noble Prophet Suleiman* with some people (non-Muslims) claiming that Prophet Suleiman was taught by Jinn, or was controlled by the Jinn (demons) or that he was instructed by chief demons and delved into Magic / Black Magic as a consequence – then gaining the anger of God and becoming a disbeliever (may Allah Protect us from such slander).

Nowadays, any discussion about Jinn needs to start from the known facts and the clear evidences outlined in the Qur’an – which is undisputed. These are that:

1. The Jinn are from the matters of the unseen (al-Ghaib); we cannot see them. Allah says, “He sees you, he and his tribe, from where you see them not” (al-A’raaf: 27), that is, Iblees and his people, or in other words, the Jinn (given that Iblees is from the Jinn: “Except Iblees – he was from the Jinn” (al-Kahf: 50).)

2. The foundation or origin of our relationship with them is that they are able to whisper to us and entice us [waswasa]. Allah says, “So Shaytaan whispered to them both” (al-A’raaf: 20); and He says, “So Shaytaan whispered to him” (Taahaa: 120), and Shaytaan here is Iblees and he is from the Jinn.

3. The Shayaateen do not have a compelling authority over man, except if man chooses to follow the Shaytaan of his own free will. Allah says, “And Shaytaan shall say after the affair is decided: Surely Allah promised you the promise of truth, and I gave you promises, then failed to keep them to you, and I had no authority over you, except that I called you and you answered me.” (Ibraaheem: 22))

And He says, “You have no authority over my slaves, except he who follows you of the deviant.” (al-Hijr: 42))

And He says, “When you recite the Qur’an seek refuge in Allah from the accursed Shaytaan. Indeed he has no authority of those who believe and place their trust in their Lord. His authority extends only to those who befriend him and those who associate partners with Allah.” (al-Nahl: 100)

4. Any physical/material relationship other than this fundamental relationship which Allah has clarified requires a particular text (Qur’an or Sunnah) establishing it. If a text exists explaining any such relationship then we agree with it in accordance with that text. For example the authority of Suleiman* over the Jinn and his ability to command and prohibit them is a matter about which a text has come, thus we affirm it. Allah says in surah al-Naml about Suleiman*,  “And (We made) the wind (subservient) to Suleiman, which made a month's journey in the morning and a month's journey in the evening, and We made a fountain of molten copper to flow out for him, and of the jinn there were those who worked before him by the command of his Lord; and whoever turned aside from Our command from among them, We made him taste of the punishment of burning. They made for him what he pleased of fortresses and images, and bowls (large) as watering-troughs and cooking-pots that will not move from their place; give thanks, O family of Dawūd! and very few of My servants are grateful.” (Saba’: 12)

5. The Messenger of Allah (saw) would treat any physical/material occurrence as a human matter, so long as no revelation came establishing that the Jinn had a relation to the matter. All matters were in origin taken as human affairs – without subjecting them to any form of superstition. If a dead man were found for instance it would not be thought that the Jinn killed him unless a text about such were found. Such was the case in the incident of the dead man found in Khaybar where the search was directed at who from amongst the people killed him, and did not extend to even the possibility of the Jinn having done so. This was the same for all other matters where an rational explanation was always sought.

6. Hence so long as a text mentioning a material relationship regarding any given incident is not found, the relationship between Jinn and man remains limited to whispering and incitement. Further, because the message of the Messenger (saw) is the seal of the messages, where after the revelation ceased and no new text will come, therefore no material relationship between Jinn and man can be established. There remains only the possibility of whispering and incitement, and as we have mentioned there is no authority in the whispering of the Jinn over man except if man responds to that whispering by his own choice.

This is how material matters were treated in the time of the Khulafa’ al-Raashideen, such that at the occurrence of no material event, be it murder, theft, deception, or fraud, did the mind turn to the Jinn. It always turned to men, because the relation of Jinn is one of whispering and incitement, except if a text exists to say otherwise. Since no specific texts can come after the Messenger of Allah (saw), all material occurrences are from men, not from the Jinn, for their world is different to ours, and their relationship with us is a relationship of whispering alone. Even the early scholars ignored the issues of Jinn-Human relationship and there are no books on ‘The Fiqh of Jinn’ nor any hadith collections about ‘Jinn and Human interaction’.

Therefore if someone falls ill there is no connection of this with the Jinn. The illness is to be treated according to the Islamic injunctions, that is, through therapy. This treatment can be material (medicine) or through du’a and ruqya.

As for the former it is like what came in the hadith from Usaamah ibn Shareek that he said, “I came to the Prophet (saw) and his Companions who were as if they had birds on their heads. I greeted them and sat down. Then came bedouins from various areas and asked, ‘O Messenger of Allah, should we take medicine’? He replied, ‘Take medicine for indeed Allah has not made an illness except that he has created its cure, except only one illness, death.’ (Abu Daawūd)

As for the latter, it is like what came in the hadith related by Muslim from Aa’isha that, “The Messenger of Allah* used to recite this incantation (ruqyah), ‘Lord of the people, remove the trouble for in your Hand is the cure; none is there to relieve him but you.’ This and the like supplications from the Qur’an and Sunnah or that which accords with them can be used.

As for resorting to those who claim to have a material connection with the Jinn in order to cure an illness, then this is fraud and deception from those fraudsters who fool the common people and unjustly consume their wealth.

7. As for the interpretation of the “touch” in Ayah 275 in Al-Baqara which is “Those who swallow usury will not rise, except as someone knocked by Satan from the touch. That is because they say, “Commerce is like usury.” But God has permitted commerce, and has forbidden usury. Whoever, on receiving advice from his Lord, refrains, may keep his past earnings, and his case rests with God. But whoever resumes—these are the dwellers of the Fire, wherein they will abide forever.” [al-Baqara: 275]

The most correct opinion regarding the interpretation of the Ayah is that the swallower of usury is as the one who the Shaytan knocks from the touch, or due to insanity, as in the insanity is prior to the knocking of the Shaytan of the person, so the person is insane for some reason then the Shaytan knocks him with his whispering and imagination. So the Shaytan does not make one insane, or else the Ayah would be (the one who the Shaytan knocks with the touch) with the “Ba’” affixed to insanity, meaning that he afflicted him with insanity, and this allegory is a stark sensory description due to the severity of the crime of the one who swallows usury.

No Supersitions
The du’as / ruqya are talking about seeking refuge from different types of evil, attempting to seek power from other than Allah which is what they do when attempt magic - it does not mean it is possible. At that time they used to engage in different actions such as blowing on knots etc in order to achieve this.

To attempt black magic is a type of kufr and shirk as it is trying to seek power from shaytan. However it does not have a reality i.e. it is not real magic which can affect things in the world.

Jinn belongs to the subject of al-ghaib, hence every single bit of information we collect about them must never be from "experience", it must be collected from the source of al-ghaib, ie. the Quran, otherwise you don't know what you're dealing with. Since no single valid text exists, neither in Quran nor in Hadith, we CANNOT contribute anything to the Jinn except for the waswas. For those that claim to be in communication with the Jinn - How do tyou know that this was Jinn? Maybe it was an alien? Maybe a super intelligent virus? Maybe it is hypnotism? Or maybe it's a subconscious mental condition? Allahu 'Alim.

Some explain these other phenomena as a mental health problem called Trance and Possession Disorder. It is a psychological "disorder" some people get when they believe that they are possessed or when they believe they are visited by "spirits" etc, and is trans-cultural as it manifests with similar symptoms using local contexts. Trance and Possession Disorder makes people, and their bodies, behave very much like someone who has been hypnotized with many people believing that they are possessed or affected by a Jinn, Spirit, Satan, or even aliens. So a "witch doctor" from some pygmy tribe in Africa, who believes that he can become a media for communication of dead spirits, will behave in accordance with that belief when he believes a spirit has possessed his body and you'll see him shake and turn his eyes and talk in riddles. Some people, here in the west, believe that they has been abducted by aliens from space. Some believe that the aliens are using them as medias for communication and their manifestation of "Trance and Possession Disorder" makes them behave as such. Talking with strange voices, doing strange things, etc. It is the same power of the mind that a hypnotist is preying on when he manages to make people believe they are frogs, dogs, or that their body is on fire. So they behave as they believe.

Once you understand that the Jinn cannot possess you, and you believe that fact, then their waswas will no longer affect you and the hypnotic effect of their waswas will stop. Then nothing will happen any longer.


Infallibility of Prophets
The propaganda around Suleiman* also deals with another issue around which is that of the infallibility of the Prophets. It is a core belief of all Muslims that Prophets cannot sin or make mistakes in the deen. In fact, we believe that Allah chooses the Prophets because of their great belief in Him, their character and ability to spread Islam. He would not chose people as role models that were evil or sinned because people would not follow the message. Linked to this, we should not accept any rumour that our Prophets were under the influence of magic or Shaytaan because Allah would prevent that. Hence, many scholars reject the fabrication that the Prophet* was under the spell of a Jew and nearly all scholars reject the fabrication that Shaytaan inserted verses into the Qur’an. We have previously dealt with the Satanic Verses and will briefly deal with the case of magic on the Prophet* below:

The story about magic on the Prophet* are singular narrations (khabar ahad) that say the Prophet* was affected by magic but the meaning of these cannot be accepted as they contradict the definite matter of infallibility of the Prophet* and that he could not be influenced by Shaytan or evil in any way.

The actual authenticity of the narrations themselves have been doubted by scholars because the chains of transmission of this story is very doubtful – even though some compilers of hadith included the hadith in their books for technical reasons.

Also, there are many contradictions in the various narrations of the story. Some say that the Prophet* imagined he was doing a thing but he was not doing it. Others say that he thought he had done a thing but actually he had not done; or he intended to do something but would forget doing it. In some narrations the objects used in magic (the Prophet*’s comb with his hair sticking to it) are taken out of the well in which they were placed while in others they are not taken out. In some narrations ‘Aishah asks why did the Prophet* not show the objects to the people while in others her question is about why did he not expose Labid ibn al-A‘sam, the Jewish magician who allegedly cast the spell on the Prophet*. These contradictions are found in those narrations that come from Hisham and are acceptable to Bukhari and Muslim. If we include other narrations the contradictions increase. Some say that Jibra`il came and revealed the details of magic. Others say that it were two angels (often not identified by names, but sometimes named as Jibra`il and Mika`il) who made the revelation. Some say that Labid did the magic while others say that his sisters performed the evil deed. Some say that the Prophet himself went to take out the objects used in the act of magic. Others say that he sent some of his Companions for the task. Some say that the Prophet forgave the Jewish magician while one narration says that he was executed. Some narrations talk only of the effect of magic on the sexual relations but others talk of loss of appetite and still others talk of blindness. In many narrations the cure happens when the object used in magic were found, while in others the cure happens when Surahs 113 and 114 were revealed and recited by the Prophet. The objects used in magic are also subject to change. In some narrations instead of the comb and hair the object is a thread with knots. In some narrations the Jewish magician is forgiven but in some he is killed.

Some scholars from relatively early times have rejected the story. Thus Imam Abu Bakr al-Jassas (305-370 AH), one of the greatest hanafi scholars of the fourth century writes in his Ahkam al-Qur`an: This type of ahadith has been created by heretics who give importance to low-level people [by allowing the possibility that likes of Labid could cast a spell on the Prophet]. They are fabricated to falsify the miracles of the prophets and to create doubts in them and to show that there is no difference between miracles of the prophets and tricks of the magicians, all being of the same nature.

In addition, the character of Surah 113 (Daybreak) is one a Meccan Surah not one revealed in Medina – which is the claim for those that support the idea of magic on the Prophet*.


Advice from the Prophet*
Ruqya is simply a form of dua. We are asked to seek protection from evil and those that pursue evil and those that pursue the art of magic – but does not endorse the existence of supernatural powers of magic. Prophet Muhammad* provided us with the recipe through which we can protect ourselves from these evils if we recite - after the five daily prayers - the last three chapters of the Holy Quran which are number 112, 113 and 114. And here is their translation:

(112) Unity
In the name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful
Say: He is Allah, the One! Allah, the eternally besought of all! He begets not nor was begotten. And there is none comparable unto Him.

(113) Daybreak
In the name of Allah the Beneficent, the Merciful
Say I seek refuge in the in the Lord of daybreak From the evil of that which he created; From the evil of the darkness when it is intense, and from the evil of malignant witchcraft, And from the evil of the envious when he envies.

(114) Mankind
In the name of Allah the beneficent, the Merciful
Say: I seek refuge in the Lord of mankind, The King of mankind, The God of mankind, From the evil of the sneaking whisper, Who whispers in the hearts of mankind, Of the jinn and of mankind.

Secondly the Prophet* encouraged us to recite the greatest verse in the Qur'an called the verse of the Throne (Ayat al-Kursi) after each and every one of the five daily prayers and before going to bed - translated as follows:

"Allah! There is no God save Him, the Alive, and the Eternal. Neither slumber nor sleep overtakes Him. Unto Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is in the earth. Who is he that intercedes with Him save by His leave? He knows that which is in front of them and that which is behind them, while they encompass nothing of His knowledge save what He will. His chair encompasses the heavens and the earth, and He is never weary of preserving them. He is the sublime, the Tremendous" (2:255).


Tuesday, 10 July 2012

8 July 2012


Seerah of Muhammed*
*: May the peace blessings and Mercy of Allah be upon him
TMQ: Translation to the nearest meaning of the Qur’an
Reconnoitring The Weapons of The Messenger Of Allah*:
The spies that Malik had already dispatched to spy Muslim forces, returned with their limbs smashed. “Woe unto you! What happened to you?” Said Malik. They said: “We have seen distinguished people on spotted horsebacks. What you see, would not have happened if we had been firmly together.”

Reconnoitring The Enemy's Weapon:
News about the enemy’s marching were conveyed to the Messenger of Allah* , so he sent out Al-Aslami with orders to mix with people, stay with them so that he would be able to know their news and to convey it to the Messenger of Allah* when he turns back. That was exactly what he managed to do.

The Messenger Of Allah* Leaves Mecca For Hunain
On Shawwal, the ninth, the captive day, the Messenger of Allah* left Mecca accompanied by twelve thousand Muslims. Ten thousand of those had previously shared in Mecca Conquest. A great number of the other two thousand, who were Makkans, had recently embraced Islam. That march was on the nineteenth day of his conquest to Mecca. He borrowed a hundred armours with their equipment from Safwan bin Umaiyah. Before setting out, the Prophet had sent to Safwan to borrow a hundred coats of mail which he was known to possess, and the weapons that went with them. "O Muhammad," said Safwan, "is it a question of 'Give or I will take?'" "It is a loan to be returned," said the Prophet, whereupon Safwan agreed to provide the camels for the transport of the armour and arms which he handed over to the Prophet when they had reached their final camp. He appointed ‘Itab bin Usaid as a governor over Mecca and appointed Mu'adh ibn Jabal, a young but well informed man of Khazraj, to instruct converts in all matters that concerned the religion. When it was evening time, a horseman came to the Messenger of Allah* and said: “I have climbed up so and so mountains and came across Hawazin with their riding camels, livestock and sheep. Hawazin wholly were gathered together there.” The Messenger of Allah* smiled then and said: “They will all be Muslims’ spoils tomorrow, if Allah wills.”

The Tree and superstitions
On their way to Hunain they saw a great green Nabk plant, that was called Dhat-Anwat (the one with suspenders). That was because the Arabs used to hang their weapons on it, slay beasts under it and keep to it. So some of army members asked the Messenger of Allah* to make them a Nabk with suspenders as the one they had. “Allah is the Greatest of all!” He said, “I swear by the One in Whose Hand is Muhammad’s soul, that you have just said what the people of Moses said to him. They said ‘Make us a god as the one they have.’ Surely you are ignorant people. These are Sunnah, but you will follow and comply with the modes of life of those who preceded you.” Seeing how great in number the army was, some of them said: “We shall not be defeated.”

Guarding the Muslims before battle
That night Anas bin Abi Murthid Al-Ghanawi volunteered to guard (Ribat) after the Prophet* gave him specific instructions on where to go and what to do. When the nigh was over, at Fajr time, he returned and told the Prophet* that he didn’t see anything, nor did he leave his station except to pray or answer the call of nature. The Prophet* praised him and said that his reward for standing guard that nigh was Jannah!
Ribat means standing in guard of the borderlines, at the places feared to be attacked by the enemies of Islam, and a Murabit is the person garrisoned there, who has dedicated himself to Jihad (striving / fighting) in the Cause of Allah and defending His Deen (Religion) and his Muslim brothers. There are many Hadith that have been mentioned on the merits of staying in guardian and defence of the Muslim frontiers in the Cause of Allah for you Muslim brothers who are yearning to stand guarding the frontiers in the Cause of Allah such as: It is narrated on the authority of Sahl ibn Sa'd that the Messenger of Allah* said, "Ribat (guarding the Muslim frontiers) in the Cause of Allah for one day is better than this world and whatever is on it; and the place occupied by the whip of one of you in Paradise is better than this world and whatever is on it; and a morning or an evening's journey that a Servant travels in the Cause of Allah is better than this world and whatever is on it. " [Al-Bukhari, Muslim, Al-Tirmidhy, and others]. It is also narrated on the authority of Salman that he heard the Messenger of Allah* saying, "Ribat (guarding the Muslim frontiers) for one day and night is better than Sawm (Fasting) for one month and standing its nights in prayer. Anyone who dies doing it will continue to receive the reward for that deed he used to do and will continue to have his Rizq (sustenance) and will be safe from Fitan (trials of death and within the grave). " [Muslim]

The Ambush And Panic: The Islamic Army Stunned The Archers And The Attackers
The Muslim army arrived at Hunain. Malik bin ‘Awf, who had previously entered the valley by night, gave orders to his army to hide inside the valley and lurk for the Muslims on roads, entrances, narrow hiding places. His orders to his men were to hurl stones at Muslims whenever they caught sight of them and then to make a one-man attack against them.
The sky was overcast, so that it was still almost dark as they descended into the valley bed. Khalid was in the van as before, commanding Sulaym and others. Next came the Muslim part of the new Meccan contingent. The Prophet, mounted on Duldul, was this time in the midst of the army, with the same squadron of Emigrants and Helpers, but surrounded by more members of his own family than ever before, including his cousins Abu Sufyan and 'Abd Allah, who had joined him on his way to Mecca, and the two eldest sons of 'Abbas, FadI and Qitham, and the two sons of Abu Lahab. In the rear of the army were those of the Meccans who had not yet entered Islam. At early dawn the Messenger of Allah* started mobilizing his army and distributing posts and flags to people. In the dark and just before dawn the Muslims moved towards Hunain Valley. They started descending into it unaware of the presence of an enemy lurking for them inside the valley.
The van had almost finished its descent when in the half-light the stationary host of Hawazin loomed into view above them on the opposite slope. It was a formidable spectacle, the more so because in the rear of the army itself there were thousands of camels, unmounted or mounted by woman, and in the dimness of dawn they appeared to be part of the army itself. The road was clearly barred in that direction; but before any new instructions could be sought or any new orders given, Malik gave his signal. The squadrons of Hawazin suddenly wheeled out of the ravines and swept down upon Khalid and his men. The onslaught was so fierce and so sudden that he could do nothing to rally the Bani Sulaym, who made little or no resistance, but turned and fled headlong, scattering the ranks of the Meccans who were behind them and who now followed them in flight up the slope that they had just descended. The terrible stampede of horses and camels choked the defile in its narrowest parts, but the Prophet was at a point where he could withdraw a little to his right, and he now made a firm stand at the side of the road with a small body of those who had been riding near him -Abu Bakr, 'Umar and others of the Emigrants, some of the Helpers (Ansar), and all the men of his family who were present.
Hawazin arrows began showering intensively at them, whereas the enemy’s battalions started a fierce attack against the Muslims, who had to retreat in disorder and utter confusion. It was such a shatteringly defeat that Abu Sufyan bin Harb, who had recently embraced Islam, said that their retreat would not stop till they got to the Red Sea. Jablah or Kildah bin Al-Juna commented on that by saying: “Surely magic has grown inactive today.”
The Messenger of Allah* turned to the right and said: “Come on, people! I am the Messenger of Allah. I am Muhammad, the son of Abdullah.” Those who stood fast by him were only few Emigrants (Muhajir) and some of his kinsmen. The matchless bravery of the Prophet* was then brought to light. He went on and on in his attempts to make his mule stand fast in the face of the disbelievers while saying loudly: “Truly saying, I am the Prophet I am the (grand) son of Abdul Muttalib.” However, Abu Sufyan bin Harith, who was then holding the rein of the Prophet’s mule, and Al-‘Abbas, who was holding its stirrup; were endeavouring to make it halt. The Messenger of Allah* dismounted and asked his Lord to render him help. “O, Allah, send down Your Help!” He then asked for some dirt or sand to throw at the enemy…

Fiqh Topic (part 8): Daleel in Detail
We talked about Conclusive and 'Doubtful' sources and Conclusive and 'Doubtful' / ambiguous meanings whilst trying to explain Daleel (Evidence).

Daleel
Linguistically, Daleel means a proof, indication, or evidence. As a (Shariah) term, Daleel means the source or evidence for a thought, concept, or a ruling. Any law or ruling must have a Daleel, which can be from Qur’an, Sunnah, or a source, which Qur’an and Sunnah directed us to adopt.

Structure of Daleel
There are two aspects related to any Daleel: Riwayah (reportage) and Dalalah (meaning).
  • The Riwayah covers issues related to how the information was relayed to us, which includes the number and the integrity of its reporters.
  • The Dalalah is related to the meaning of the text in the Daleel.
There are also two terms used in connection with Riwayah and Dalalah; Qata’i [üü] and Dhanni [??].
  • Qata’i is defined as being conclusive or decisive,
  • Dhanni is the opposite of Qata’i and means ambiguous, non-definite, speculative or indecisive.

Riwayah (report)
Any Ayah from the Qur’an or Hadith Mutawatir is considered Qata’i (conclusive) [üü] in its Riwayah (report). The Qata’i in Riwayah implies that the evidence is authentic without any shadow of doubt. This authenticity is established based on the methodology of transmission. The methodology by which the Qur’an was transmitted to us precludes any possibility of fabrication. The report was transmitted generation by generation in exactly the same manner. It is impossible for an entire generation to fabricate, erase, or add contents to the Qur’an. It is inconceivable to believe that every single individual in that generation assembled together and agreed to add or delete parts of the Qur’an. Everyone in that generation was reciting the same contents of the Qur’an, thus authentifying its contents.
Hadith Mutawatir was not transmitted generation-by-generation, but rather by a large number of people. Due to the large number of people reporting the Daleel, and their diversity of residence, their established reliability and conviction, it is inconceivable that this Daleel could be wrong.
Any report of information other than through the Qur’an or Hadith Mutawatir, such as Hadith Ahad, is considered Dhanni (non-definite) [??], meaning that there is a minute possibility that the Daleel could contain error. To summarise Riwayah (report) can be:
  • Qata’i (Conclusive) [üü] is Qur’an and Hadith Mutawatir (e.g. “Whosoever lies about me deliberately, let him take his place in the Hell fire.”)
  • Dhanni (Non-Definite) [??] is Hadith Ahad (e.g. “Leave it, it is rotten”. [Refers to all forms of Asabiyah, racism]. (Bukhari and Muslim))

Dalalah (meaning)
The second aspect of the Daleel is the Dalalah (meaning). If the text of Qur’an, Hadith Mutawatir or Hadith Ahad is clear, specific, and has only one meaning, then it is considered Qata’i [üü]. The text of a Qata’i Daleel has to have only one meaning and cannot be open to any other interpretation. If the text is open to more than one interpretation, then it is considered Dhanni [??]. Since interpretations are due to the Arabic language, any interpretation has to be justified through the Arabic language. To summarise Dalalah (Meaning) can be:
Qata’i (Conclusive) [üü] Qur’an (One meaning) or Hadith Mutawatir (One meaning) or Ahad Hadith (One meaning)
  • Example of Qur’an with a Qata’i (conclusive) meaning: “What your wives leave, your share is a half, if they leave no child”. (TMQ An-Nisa: 12) or “Those who accuse chaste woman of zina (adultery) and fail to bring four witnesses (to prove it) flog them eighty stripes.” (TMQ An-Nur: 4) The quantitative aspect of these rulings, namely one half and eighty are clear and therefore cannot be open to any other interpretations.
  • Example of Hadith Mutawatir with Qata’i (conclusive) meaning: “Whosoever lies about me (Prophet Muhammad saw) deliberately let him take his place in the hell-fire.” (Bukhari & Muslim) This Mutawatir Hadith is very clear in its subject; thus there is only one understanding from the text that whoever lies about what Prophet* said, intentionally, he will go to hell-fire.
  • Example of Hadith Ahad with Qata’i (conclusive) meaning: It is reported from a non-Mutawatir Hadith that the Prophet* fasted 6 days in Shawwal. The conclusive meanings from this Hadith are the permissibility of fasting 6 days in Shawwal (except on the first day of Shawwal, since it is the day of Eid, and it is Haram to fast on Eid).
Dhanni (Non-definite) [??] Qur’an (More than one meaning) or Hadith Mutawatir (More than one meaning) or Ahad Hadith (More than one meaning)
  • Example of Quranic Ayah with a Dhanniy (non-definite) meaning: Allah says: “O you who believe! When you intend to offer As-Salat (the prayer), wash your faces and your hands (forearms) up to the elbows, rub (by passing wet hands over) your heads, and (wash) your feet up to ankles. If you are in a state of Janaba (i.e. had a sexual discharge), purify yourself (bathe your whole body). But if you are ill or on a journey or any of you comes from answering the call of nature, or you have been in contact with women and you find no water, then perform Tayammum with clean earth and rub therewith your faces and hands.” (TMQ Al-Maida: 6) The verse says if you ‘lamastum’ the women, it breaks the Wudhu. The word ‘lamastum’ has been interpreted as having two meanings – either ‘Touching’ or ‘being intimate’. Thus the Ayah has a Dhanni Dalalah, i.e. it could mean touching women breaks the Wudhu, or sexual intercourse with a woman breaks the Wudhu.
  • Example of Hadith Mutawatir with a Dhanniy (non-definite) meaning: It was reported that the Prophet* used to take off his Ihram in a specific manner. However, when the Sahabah (ra) told the Prophet* that they took it off in a manner different from the way he* took it off, the Prophet* approved of their actions. Though this incident is Mutawatir, the rules to take off one’s Ihram are many.
  • Example of a Hadith Ahad with a Dhanniy (non-definite) meaning: It is reported from a non-Mutawatir Hadith that the Prophet fasted 6 days in Shawwal. The non-definite meanings of this Hadith are whether the six days of fasting are consecutive or fasting in which part of Shawwal (other than the day of Eid)?
So far we have discussed the Qata’i and Dhanni aspects of both Riwayah and Dalalah separately. However, the method to determine whether the Daleel (both in Riwayah and Dalalah) is Qata’i (conclusive) or Dhanni (non-definite) is the following:
1: Qata’i Riwayah [üü] + Qata’i Dalalah [üü] = Qata’i Daleel [üü]
2: Dhanni Riwayah [??] + Qata’i Dalalah [üü] = Dhanni Daleel [??]
3: Dhanni Riwayah [??] + Dhanni Dalalah [??] = Dhanni Daleel [??]
4: Qata’i Riwayah [üü] + Dhanni Dalalah [??] = Dhanni Daleel [??]

Aqeeda must be definite / without doubt but the Laws can be from either source
Any idea, thought, or concept related to the Aqeedah has to be based upon a Qata’i Daleel. As an example, the concept that Angels exists is based upon a Qata’i Daleel not Dhanni. Also, in Usul al-Fiqh, to establish a source for extracting rulings according to the strongest view, the source must base upon a Qata’i Daleel as well. As an example, to consider Ijma as-Sahabah (consensus of the Companions) as a source of rulings, the Daleel to prove the authority of Ijma as-Sahabah has to be Qata’i both in Riwayah and Dalalah, though a ruling can be derived from either Qata’i or Dhanni Daleel.

Why is understanding the text of Qur’an and Sunnah so complicated?
By examining the text of Qur’an and Sunnah one can see that it is limited in its volume. With its limited text one can generate rulings to any problems affecting us anywhere and anytime until the Day of Judgment. It is a miracle from Allah that the texts of the Qur’an and Sunnah have the ability to express numerous rulings from a single Ayah and Hadith; whereas, the ability to understand many meanings from a single text cannot be found in any other legal text in the world!
The challenge is for Muslims in each generation to try to understand the text and relate it to their lives since the Qur’an and Sunnah are relevant to all times and places.
Besides the point mentioned above, we have to realise that there are rules and guidelines related to understanding and deriving laws from the Qur’an and Sunnah. No one, without being acquainted with these rules (Arabic language, rules which differentiate one type of text from another, etc.) can understand the text of Qur’an and Sunnah. Even to understand man-made constitutions, one has to spend a few years studying and understanding the text. So, how can we expect an individual who is unfamiliar with the Usul al-Fiqh to open up the Qur’an and Sunnah and start extracting laws from it?

Shariah:
Why can't Muslims use their mind to make up their laws?
Why should Muslims follow something 1400 years old?
How can Muslims face today's challenges with an ancient book?

We had a short discussion focusing on aspects of Shariah and what laws do we live our lives by. Essentially, we've been exploring over the last few weeks how Muslims should think deeply about their purpose in life and to think deeply about the universe around them.  This process of active interaction and contemplation should necessarily lead to the only sensible conclusion that there is one unique Creator (who we call Allah) and they should give our life some purpose.  We, therefore, need to find out how best to conduct ourselves and live our life.  This includes practical things like how we should pray to our Creator - if indeed we should pray at all.  Why can't we pray kneeling down and putting her hands together in front of our faces or come up with some other way of praying?  Surely we can use our mind and intellect to come up with the best way to do these things as we know our reality better than anybody else?  Furthermore, if we have insisted on using our mind and intellect to come to the conclusion that Allah exists - surely we can use the same process to work out how we should live! This is the premise behind philosophies like democracy - where mankind can decide what is best.

The criticism that his charged towards the Muslims is why we insist on following something which is over 1400 years old - and, because of its age, is bound to be outdated and not relevant to the 21st-century.  Linked to this is the accusation that Muslims are not equipped to deal with the challenges in modern society based on this ancient text.  So how do we respond to these accusations and are they true?  How can we, in ourselves, justify living by rules and regulations that are over a thousand years old?  And a further short discussion explored some of these questions that may occur in the playground or the workplace.  These themes will be explored in greater detail in the following weeks, InshaAllah. 

Homework from 08 July 2012:
  • Seerah: The Prophet* threw some dirt / dust at the enemies during the battle of Hunain. What did this do to the enemy and how did it make them feel?
  • Shariah - Whilst talking about the need for Laws we wanted to know what things/needs are essential for human survival (without which man[kind] would die) and what instinct does man[kind] have?

Monday, 14 May 2012

13 May 2012
Cleaning the Kaaba, granting immunity; Fiqh (3) and Belief (2)

Seerah of Muhammed*
*: May the peace blessings & Mercy of Allah be upon him
TMQ: Translation to the nearest meaning of the Qur’an


Military Forces Of Islam Enter The City
Before the forces of Islam reached the main roads of the city of Mecca, the Prophet* summoned all the commanders of the army and said to them: "It is my earnest desire that Mecca should be conquered without any bloodshed. Killing of non-combatant persons should, therefore, be avoided. However, ten persons namely 'Ikrimah bin Abu Jahl, Habbar bin Aswad, Abdullah bin Sa'd Abi Sarah, Miqyas Subabah Laythi, Huwairath bin Nuqayd, Abdullah Hilal and four women who have been guilty of murder or apostasy or blasphemy, whenever they are captured". This order was notified to all the soldiers through their commanders. Notwithstanding the fact that the mental attitude of the people of Mecca towards the Prophet* was very clear, he did not ignore military precautions at the time of entry into Mecca. His plan was as follows: All the units forming one line reached Zi Tuwa (an elevated point from where the houses of Mecca as well as the Kaaba and the Masjidul Haram can be seen), while the Prophet* was encircled by a regiment consisting of five thousand soldiers.
When the Prophet*’s eyes fell on the houses of Mecca, tears of joy gathered in his eyes and as a mark of thanksgiving for the victory which he had gained without any resistance on the part of Quraish, he, while riding the camel, bent himself so much that his beard touched the saddle fixed on the back of the camel. As a precautionary measure, he divided the army and sent a part of it from the upper side and another part from the lower side of Mecca. He did not content himself with only this and also sent units by all the routes which led to the city.
All the units entered the city without any fighting and the gates of the city were opened for them, except the unit which was commanded by Khalid bin Walid. The camel of the Prophet* entered the city with great dignity and grandeur from the highest point of Mecca (Azakhir). He alighted in Jahoon by the side of the grave of his dear uncle, Abu Talib, and a special tent was pitched for him.

The Prophet* cleanses the Kaaba of idols
The city of Mecca, which had been the centre of idol worship for a very long time, surrendered before the army of Islam and all the points of the city came under the control of the Muslim soldiery. The Prophet* took rest for some time in the tent. Thereafter he mounted a camel and proceeded to the Masjidul Haram for pilgrimage and tawaf (circumambulation) of the Kaaba. He had put on military dress, was wearing a helmet on his head and the Muhajirs and the Ansar encircling him reflected his greatness. The reins of the camel of the Prophet* were being held by Muhammad bin Maslamah, and the Muslims and some of the idolaters had lined up on his route. Some of them were astonished and over-awed whereas others were expressing their joy. For some good purposes the Prophet* did not alight from his camel and arrived in Masjidul Haram mounted on it and halted opposite the Black Stone. Instead of kissing the Black Stone he pointed towards it with a special stick which he was carrying in his hand and uttered Takbir. Imitating the Prophet, his companions, who were gathered round their illustrious leader uttered Takbir with a loud voice. The voice of Takbir reached the ears of the idolaters of Mecca, who had taken refuge in their houses or at elevated places.
A strange tumult prevailed in the mosque and the hue and cry of the people prevented the Prophet* from performing tawaf peacefully. The Prophet* made a sign to the people to remain quiet. Perfect silence prevailed immediately and all those within and outside the mosque began looking at the Prophet. He began performing tawaf and during the first round of tawaf, turned towards the three big idols named Hubal, Isaf and Na'ilah which had been installed above the gate of the Kaaba. He knocked them down with a stick or a spear which he was carrying in his hand and recited this verse: Say: Truth has come and falsehood has been banished and falsehood is certainly doomed to banishment. (Surah Isra, 17:81) As ordered by the Prophet, Hubal was broken to pieces before the very eyes of the idolaters.
In those days Uthman bin Talhah was the custodian of the keys of the Kaaba and this office of his was hereditary. The Prophet* asked Bilal to go to Uthman's house and bring the key of the Kaaba from him. Bilal conveyed the Prophet*’s message to the custodian. However, his mother prohibited him from surrendering the key and said, "Custodianship of the Kaaba is our hereditary honour and we should not lose this honour". Uthman caught the hand of his mother and took her into a closet and said, "If we don't give the key voluntarily, you should rest assured that they will take it from us forcibly''. The custodian unlocked the Kaaba and the Prophet* entered the Kaaba. Usamah bin Zayd and Bilal and the custodian himself followed him in. As ordered by the Prophet* the gate of the Kaaba was closed and Khalid bin Walid stood outside it to restrain the people from swarming towards the gate. He went in and saw images of Prophets Ibrahim and Ishmael, throwing divination arrows. He denounced these acts of Quraish and ordered that all idols be dismantled, images and effigies deleted. As ordered by the Prophet, the walls were washed with the water of the well of Zam Zam and the pictures were rubbed off by Umer. The Prophet* ordered the gate of the Kaaba to be opened. Then, placed both of his hands on the wooden frame of the gate and the people could see his sacred and luminous face, he addressed them thus: "Praised be Allah, Who has fulfilled His promise and helped His servant and routed the enemies"'.
The Almighty Allah had promised the Prophet* through revelation that He would make him return to his birth-place: (Muhammad) Allah who has commanded you to follow the guidance of the Qur'an will certainly return you victoriously to your place of birth. (Surah al-Qasas, 28:85).

The Prophet* grants general immunity
Complete silence prevailed over the precincts of the mosque and outside it. The people, holding their breath, were thinking different things. At this hour the people of Mecca were reminded of the cruelty, oppression and injustice which they had perpetrated and various other thoughts came to their minds. The people, who had risen a number of times to fight bloody battles against the Prophet, had wounded and killed his friends and companions, and had decided to conduct a night attack on his house and to cut him to pieces, were now in his control and he could take any sort of revenge on them. These people, while mentioning the big crimes committed by them, were saying to one another: "He will certainly put us to the sword or will kill some of us and detain others and will make our women and children prisoners". They were absorbed in different satanic thoughts when suddenly the Prophet* broke the silence and said, "What are you saying and what are you thinking about me?" The astonished and frightened people, keeping in mind the past favours of the Prophet, said with broken voice: "We are not thinking of anything about you except kindness and goodness. We consider you to be our honourable brother and the son of our honourable brother." When the Prophet, who was inherently kind and forgiving, heard these emotional sentences from them, he said in reply: "I too say to you the same thing, which my brother Yusuf said to his unkind brothers i.e., "Have no fear this day! May Allah forgive you, and He is the Most Merciful of the merciful". While granting general amnesty the Prophet* addressed the people of Mecca thus: "You have been my very unreasonable countrymen. You refuted my prophethood and turned me out of my house. And when I took refuge in a far-off place, you rose to fight against me. However, inspite of all these crimes of yours, I forgive all of you and make you free and declare that you may go after the pursuits of your life."

The Blacklist
Shedding blood of the arch-criminals was declared lawful even under the curtains of Al-Kaaba. As for those who were killed, mention could be made of Abdul 'Uzza bin Khatal who had become a Muslim and then deputed to collect alms-tax in the company of a Helper. They had also a slave with them. Abdullah, in a fit of rage, killed the Helper's slave on account of a mere trifling dispute, and joined the pagan Arabs as an apostate. He was never repentant at this heinous crime but rather employed two women singers and incited them to sing satirically about the Prophet* peace be upon him. The other man who was put to death was Miqyas bin Sababa. He was a Muslim. A Helper accidently killed his brother Hisham. The Prophet* peace be upon him had arranged the payment of blood money to him, which he had accepted. His revengeful nature, however, was never appeased, so he killed the Helper and went to Mecca as an apostate. Similarly, Huwairith and one woman singer went to death. Abdullah bin Sa'd bin Abi Sarah, who embraced Islam but became apostate later, was one of the ten persons who were to be killed. The reason he ordered him to be killed was that he had been a Muslim and used to write down revelation; then he apostatized and returned to Quraysh [Mecca] and fled to Uthman Affan whose foster brother he was. The latter hid him until he brought him to the apostle after the situation in Mecca was tranquil, and asked that he might be granted immunity. The apostle* remained silent for a long time till finally he* said yes [granting Abdullah immunity from the execution order]. When Uthman had left he* said to his companions who were sitting around him, "I kept silent so that one of you might get up and strike off his head!" One of the Ansar said, "Then why didn't you give me a sign, O apostle of God?" He answered that a prophet does not kill by signals’.
On the other hand, every attempt was made to grant pardon to the people. 'Ikrimah bin Abu Jahl, who had attacked Khalid's detachment at the time of the entry into Mecca, was forgiven. To Wahshi, the murderer of Hamzah, the Prophet*’s uncle, and to Hind, who had chewed his liver, was also extended his generous clemency. The same generous treatment was accorded to Habar who had attacked the Prophet*’s daughter with a spear, while on her way from Mecca to Medina, so grievously that she ultimately died of the fatal injuries. In the same context of magnanimity peculiar to Muhammad peace be upon him, two chiefs of Quraish were pardoned once they had embraced Islam. They were Safwan bin Omaiyah and Fudalah bin 'Umair. The latter had attempted to assassinate the Prophet* peace be upon him while circumambulating in the Holy Sanctuary. The Prophet*’s matchless tolerance and broad-mindedness instigated by his mission as 'A mercy to all people', converted a terrible hypocrite into a faithful devout believer.


Fiqh Topic: Meccan & Medinan Verses, Abrogation / Cancellation

Types of Hukm Shara’i  
A. Fard (Compulsory):
B. Mandub, Mustahab, Sunnah or Nafilah (Recommended)
C. Mubah (Permissible)
D. Makruh (Disliked)
E. Haram (Prohibited)

The four definitive sources of Hukm Shar’i are;
•    the Qur’an
•    the Sunnah
•    Ijma’ as-Sahabah 
•    Qiyas

Linguistically, Fiqh implies having knowledge in depth. As a legal term, Fiqh has two meanings: Having the knowledge of the rulings of Shariah (Islamic Law) which are extracted from the legislative sources; or all the Islamic laws. This definition is synonymous to the term Shariah.

Usul al-Fiqh is the collection of principles relating to the methodology for the extraction of Fiqh or Islamic Laws: “the principles by which the mujtahid derives the legal rules of conduct from the specific evidences”.  

Within the Arabic language, there are rules for understanding the structure of an Ayah or Hadith. The rules of grammar in the Arabic language define the meaning of the Ayah or Hadith.  Unless the text of the Qur’an and Sunnah is correctly understood, no laws can be deduced from it. Examples of Qur’anic linguistic styles are:
•    Thanniy (speculative text),
•    Qatai (definitive text),
•    Amm (general text),
•    Khass (specific text),
•    Haqiqi (literal text), and
•    Majaazi (metaphorical text).

The linguistic meaning of the word Shariah is a non-exhaustive source of water with which people satisfy their thirst. The term Shariah is also interchangeable with Fiqh.

Qur’anic Verses: Meccan & Medinan verses
The commentators on the Qur’an divide the verses (and chapters) into two broad categories depending on when the Surah (or most of the verses in the Surah) were revealed. It doesn’t refer specifically to where the verses were revealed. Hence, they are defined and Mecca verses (if revealed when the Prophet* was in Mecca) and Medinan verses to describe those revealed when the Prophet was ruling in his Islamic State in Medina. Commentators have mentioned some other characteristics of these different verses / Surahs, namely:

Meccan Surahs: There are 86 chapters
Talks mostly on subjects related to faith and morals (Such as assigning partners to Allah, idol worship, life in the hereafter, good deeds and sins)
Verses that start with “Ya ayyuhan-nas (O people!)”
Verses are short.
Talks about mushriks (polytheists), does not mention Jews and Christians.
There is no verse about jihad (struggle)

Medinan Surahs: There are 28 chapters
Talks mostly on worships and practices meaning legal issues.
(Practices in exchange, murder, adultery, punishment of theft and slander, marriage and divorce methods)
Verses start with “Ya ayyuhal-lazina amanu (O believers)”
Verses are long.
Talks about Jews, Christians and hypocrites.
There are verses about jihad (struggle)

This is why Meccan surahs are focused on belief and building the strength of the Muslims because prior to migration the Muslims belief had to be made firm, but after the migration there was an Islamic State in Madinah which needed laws and regulation so most Medinan surahs are focused on that along with reminding Muslims the same message in Meccan surahs to keep their faith firm.

Abrogation / Cancellation
An essential aspect involved in interpreting the text of the Qur’an and Sunnah are issues surrounding abrogation of rulings from the Qur’an and Sunnah. The study of abrogation involves issues such as, what constitutes abrogation, how to understand it in relation to other Ayahs or Ahadith, and how to reconcile these differences. Linguistically abrogation means cancelling (Izaalah) or changing the thing and transforming it from one state to another while it still exists in essence. Technically, it is the address (Khitaab) of the legislator which prevents the continuation of a Hukm Shar’i of a previous address (Khitaab).
The abrogated (Mansookh) it is the Hukm which has been lifted, like the Hukm of waiting for complete year in respect to the widow. Allah has informed us of the occurrence of abrogation and the Ahkam which have been abrogated show us its true occurrence. “Whatever a Verse (revelation) do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, We bring a better one or similar to it. Know you not that Allah is able to do all things?” (TMQ Al-Baqarah: 106)  “And when We change a Verse in place of another, and Allah knows the best of what He sends down, they (the disbelievers) say: you (O Muhammad [saw]) are but a liar. Nay but most of them know not.” (TMQ An-Nahl: 101)
Hence, these or not contradictions in the text, nor inconsistencies. The verses were revealed and were correct for their time but were superseded later on with other rules. We will discuss this in more detail in future weeks, I/A.


Review of the Survey Results
See blog post below

Aqeeda Topic: How strongly do we believe in Allah? Myth or reality?

As Muslims, Allah commands us in the Qur’an to ‘KNOW’ that there is but one Allah. We must be sure individually for ourselves – it is not good enough to just hope in Allah without certainty. The five pillars of Islam are built upon the firm foundations of the Aqeeda – a rock solid belief. How do we get at this belief? Are there any questions that we shouldn’t ask in Islam and how inquisitive should we be in search for the Truth?

Being sure of Allah
Are we following the belief of our forefathers and older generations, much like people in the time of Ibrahim, and the time of the Prophet*, where the Quraish would say that they are merely following the religion of their ancestors. This was their excuse. What is our reason for believing in Allah – is this an active firm belief or a sense of hope, faith and trust? How we can know that Allah truly exists, or is our belief in Him like a superstition – a level of belief or ‘faith’ similar to believing in ghosts or aliens.

Language of Maths
We also talked about assumptions we make about what we see around us and the language we use. Using the example of apples we explored whether 1 + 1 = 2. According to Mathematics is does but are there real life situations where this is true?

Attributes of Allah
Many people consider their concept of ‘God’ or Allah as a being that can do anything. There are many terms to address the attributes of Allah including Omnipotent (All-Powerful), Omniscient (All-Knowing), Omnipresence (being present everywhere).

We posed the question that is often used by atheists and non-believers in a Divine Creator that, if God can do anything, can He:
- build a wall over which he cannot jump
- make a stone that he cannot lift
- make a square-circle

It is important that Muslims know how to address these and other related questions. People attending the Study Circle were encouraged to think about these topics over the next week and we shall, by the Grace of Allah, start to address these points in coming weeks…


Aqeeda = Belief in Allah (Tawhid), The Angels, The Books of Allah, The Messengers of Allah (Muhammed* is the final one), Day of Judgement, and Divine Fate & Destiny

Children's Feedback:
Practice what you preach
5 senses
The company you keep (Good & Bad friends)
How we should spend our time

Homework:
Seerah ~ Why were the Ansar anxious after the Prophet conquered Mecca and how did he reassure them?
Belief ~ Can Allah do anything? Can Allah build a wall over which He cannot jump or can He make a square-circle?