Showing posts with label martyrdom. Show all posts
Showing posts with label martyrdom. Show all posts

Friday, 20 February 2015

15 February 2015 - Courtroom Session & Saving from Punishments in the Grave

15 February 2015 - Courtroom Session and Saving from Punishments in the Grave



Lives of the Prophets: Courtroom Cases


Case 1:

The case of 99 Sheep and a good talking man with one man and his only sheep

Case 2:

The case of Sheep grazing in neighbours field destroying his livelihood

Case 3:

The case of a worshipper admiring horses and missing their prayer

Case 4:

The case of what to do with the first batch of Prisoners of War

Case 5:

Mothers disputing about whose child survived the wolf attack


Case 1:

-----------------------
Once Dawud* was in his private chamber which was the best and holiest place in his house. He had ordered that none was to invade his privacy that day. He suddenly found two persons who had climbed over the wall of the private chamber asking him to judge between them.
"Has the Story of the Disputants reached thee?
Behold, they climbed over the wall of the private chamber; when they entered to Dawud* and he was terrified of them, they said: 'Fear not: we are two disputants, one of whom has wronged the other: decide now between us with truth, and treat us not with injustice, but guide us to the even Path.
This man is my brother: he has nine and ninety ewes, and I have (but) one: yet he says: 'Commit her to my care " and he is moreover harsh to me in speech.'
(Dawud*) said: 'He has undoubtedly wronged thee in demanding thy (single) ewe to be added to his flock of ewes: truly many are the Partners (in business) who wrong each other: not so do those who believe and work deeds of righteousness, and how few are they?'
And Dawud* gathered that We had tried him: he asked forgiveness of his Lord, fell down, bowing (in prostration) and turned (to Allah in repentance).
So We forgave him this (lapse): he enjoyed, indeed, a Near Approach to Us, and a beautiful Place of (final) return." (TMQ Saad: 21-25)

* Hence – do not jump to conclusions until you hear both sides of the story. Once you make a mistake immediately ask for Allah’s forgiveness. It is important to learn in improve after mistakes.

Case 2:

-----------------------
"And remember Dawud* and Solomon, when they give judgment in the matter of the field into which the sheep of certain people had strayed by night: We did witness their judgment. To Solomon We inspired the (right) understanding of the matter: to each (of them) we gave Judgment and Knowledge."
It was recounted by many narrators that those people had a vineyard, wherein the sheep of the other people had spread, i.e. trespassed on by night and ate up all its plants.
They raised their case to Dawud* and he awarded the owner of the field the sheep themselves in compensation for his damage.
When they went out and met Solomon, he asked them, "what did the Prophet of Allah rule?" They answered, "He ruled so and so."
He said, "Had it been up to me, I would have ordered the sheep to be handed to the owners of the vineyard to benefit from its yield and profit until the owners of the sheep have restored the vineyard of the other people to its previous condition, and then they could have their sheep back."
When Dawud* was informed of this, he approved it.

*Hence – both judged with the facts and made correct decisions but one was closer to justice than the other. It is important not just to have a Just Law (Shariah) but also a Just Judge (with Iman) who applies the Law appropriately. Throughout the many centuries of Islam and the Islamic State Muslims have grown up with the idea of variations in application of the Shariah and this has led to tolerance of different opinions as Islam is not a monolith and Shariah is more than simply the Hudood. There is no territory today that applies Islam even though they may claim to.


Case 3:

-----------------------
The Story of Solomon* with the Horses: Allah says in Surah Saad:
"To Dawud* we gave Solomon (for a son)" and he was a Prophet "how excellent in Our service! Ever did he tum when (to Us)!"
"Behold, there were brought before him, at eventide, horses of the highest breeding, and swift offoot; And he said, 'Truly do I love the love of Good, with a view to the glory of my Lord '-until (the sun) was hidden in the veil (of Night):" (Saad: 32)
Some scholars say that Solomon* was so engrossed in the inspection of his fine horses that he completely forgot to perform his Asr prayer before the sunset (not deliberately).
Upon missing the 'Asr prayer, he said, " 'Bring them back to me.' "Then he fell to slashing (their) legs and their necks with his sword.


Case 4

-----------------------
Prisoners of war constituted a problem awaiting resolution because it was a new phenomenon in the history of Islam after the Battle of Badr. The Prophet* consulted Abu Bakr and ‘Umar bin Al-Khattab as to what he should do with the prisoners.
Abu Bakr suggested that he should ransom them, explaining this by saying: "They are after all our relatives, and this money would give us strength against the disbelievers, moreover, Allâh could guide them to Islam."
‘Umar advised killing them, saying, "They are the leaders of Kufr (disbelief)."
The Prophet* preferred Abu Bakr’s suggestion to that of ‘Umar’s.
The following day, ‘Umar called on the Prophet* and Abu Bakr to see them weeping. He showed extreme astonishment and inquired about the situation so that he might weep if it was worth weeping for, or else he would feign weeping.
The Prophet* said that a Qur’ânic verse had been revealed rebuking them for taking ransom from the captives rather than slaying them: "It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allah desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allah is All- Mighty, All- Wise. Were it not a previous ordainment from Allah, a severe torment would have touched you for what you took." [TMQ 8:67-68]
The previous Divine ordainment went as follows, "Thereafter (is the time) either for generosity (i.e. free them without ransom) or ransom." [TMQ 47:4]
Which included an area providing permission to take ransom, that is why no penalty was imposed.
They were rebuked only for taking prisoners before subduing all the land of disbelief. Apart from this, the polytheists taken to Madinah were not only prisoners of war but rather archcriminals of war whom modern war penal law brings to justice to receive their due sentence of death or prison for life.


Case 5:

-----------------------
Abu Huraira said, that the Messenger of Allah* said, "Two women had their sons with them, and suddenly a wolf passed by snatching one of the two boys.
Thus they fought over the other.
The elder said, 'The wolf took your son', and the younger said, 'No, it took yours.'
They raised their case to Dawud*, who ruled that he was the elder's.
They went out and met Solomon*, who said, 'Bring me a knife and I will cut him into two, for each to take a half.
'The younger thereupon said, 'Do not, may Allah have mercy on you, he is her son.
Thus, he ruled that the child was hers. " [Bukhari, Muslim]

*Hence – the element of surprise from Solomon* allowed him to assess who really loved the child and would rather give him up than have him killed.



Main Topic: What protects us from the Punishment of the Grave?


The good deeds

The Prophet* said, “When the dead person is buried, he is able to hear the footsteps of the people when they are leaving the cemetery. Then his good deeds will surround him.
So Salah would come next to his head; fasting would come on his right side and
Zakah would come on the left side.
The other good deeds would come next to his feet.
So whenever this person would be attacked from the head, the salah would say, ‘No you cannot come from this side.’
And whenever the attack is from the right side, the siyaam [fasting] would say, ‘No, you cannot come from this side.’
The Zakah would say, you cannot come from this side.
And the other good deeds would say, you cannot from the feet.
And they would be making a shield, surrounding this person from every side and protecting this person.”


Seeking refuge in Allah from the punishment of the grave

The Prophet* said, “When you make tashahud, seek refuge in Allah from four things:
- from punishment of the hell fire,
- from the punishment of the grave,
- from the fitna of life and death, and
- from the fitna of ad-dajjal (the false messiah).”

It is a sunnah to say this [Du'aa`] during salah, after tashahud (before salaam).


Who are the ones that are saved from the punishment of the grave?

The Martyrs (shuhada)

The Prophet* said, “There are six qualities for the Martyr (shaheed): he would be forgiven with the first drop of blood that comes from his body; he would see his place in paradise; he would be saved from the punishment of the grave; he would be saved from the fear of the most fearful day; the crown of tranquility will be placed on his head – one emerald in it is worth the world and everything in it; he would be married to 72 hoor al-ayn; he would be given shafa’aa (intercession) for 70 of his relatives.”
One of the companions said, “O RasulAllah, how come the believers go through the trials of the grave, but the shaheed doesn’t?” The Prophet* said, “The shining of the swords over his head is enough of a fitna for him.”


The Frontier Guard (Al muraabit)

They are the soldier who is positioned in a station away from home, guarding the Muslims, waiting for instructions to fight. The word comes from ‘rabat’ – when you tie something. Al muraabit is someone who is tied to that post – they cannot leave. That guard/soldier has to guard day and night. It is a very difficult job. Because of that, Allah gives him a special reward. The Prophet* said, “Everyone’s deeds would be terminated they die, except for the one who dies as a muraabat. Allah would continue his deeds for him, and they would keep growing until the day of judgement, and he would be saved from the punishment of the grave.”


Those who die on Friday

In a hasan hadith, “Any Muslim who dies on Friday, Allah will save him from the punishment of the grave.”

Read Surah Mulk

Imam Ahmad recorded from Abu Hurayrah the Prophet* said, "Verily, there is a chapter in the Qur’an which contains thirty Ayat that will intercede on behalf of its reciter until he is forgiven. (It is): ‘Blessed be He in Whose Hand is the dominion.’" Ibn Abbas narrates that the Prophet* said, “It is a protector; a rescuer; saving from the punishment of the grave.” (At-Tirmidhi and Al-Hakim.)


Deeds that Benefit after death

Abu Hurairah narrated that the Prophet* said, "When a man dies, his good deeds come to an end except three: ongoing charity, beneficial knowledge, and righteous offspring who will pray for him." (Muslim)

Commenting on this hadith, Imam An-Nawawi said, "The scholars said, the meaning of this hadith is that the deeds of the deceased come to an end as soon as he or she dies, and the renewal of reward ceases for him or her, except in these three cases because he or she is the cause of them:
• his or her offspring is counted among his or her earnings,

• the knowledge that he or she leaves behind through teaching or writing,

• ongoing charity, i.e., a waqf (Islamic endowment)."

The narration below adds further details: Abu Hurairah narrated that the Prophet* said, "The good deeds that will reach a believer after his death are:
- knowledge which he learned and then spread;

- a righteous son whom he leaves behind;

- a copy of the Qur'an that he leaves as a legacy;

- a mosque that he built;

- a house that he built for wayfarers;

- a canal that he dug;

- or charity that he gave during his lifetime when he was in good health.

- These deeds will reach him after his death."
(Ibn Majah)


[We also talked about some other etiquettes of visiting the Graves such as saying ‘Salaam’ to the ‘People of the Graveyard’ who will reply back]


May Allah protect us, our families and all of the Muslims from the punishment of the grave. Ameen.

Monday, 10 December 2012

9 December 2012

Please complete the Survey
2 minute Survey on what to do after the Seerah:
Please visit this Survey Link
or click below:
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/R7LJWBJ 


We are about to finish the Seerah of the Prophet*, InshaAllah. What we would like to know is what topic people wanted to study after this on a regular basis in Future Circles. Please vote for which things you would like to discuss during the Circle. Or give your own suggestions. This shouldn't take more than 2 minutes (InshaAllah)
Q: What topic would you like to study after the Seerah is finished?
- Lives of the first 4 Khulafah (Caliph - Islamic Leaders) = Abu Bakr, Umer, Uthman & Ali
- Lives of the Prophets (Adam to Isa/Jesus)
- Other (please specify)


Summary

The Start of the Prophet’s Final Illness:
The Prophet publically praises Ali as his ‘Mawla’ to quell unrest
The Prophet* sends out Ussama bin Zaid to fight the Romans
The Prophet prays for the Muslims in the Cemetry and Martyrs of Uhud
The Prophet refuses the keys to the eartly treasures
The Start of the Disease - headache, and so he* agrees to stay in the house of Aishah
The Prophet tells the Muslims about his Choice
The Prophet publically supports Abu Bakr

What is Qiyas (Divine Analogy):
Linguistic meaning is estimation, measuring or ascertaining the length, weight, or quality of something
In Shariah: the application to a new case (far'), on which the law is silent, of the ruling (Hukm) of an original case (asl) because of the effective reason ('Illa) which is in common to both
Using a specified reason found in Qur'an or Sunnah, and applying that reason to a new situation that has no clear rule in Qur'an or Sunnah
Examples include repaying your debt to people compared to debt to Allah
The reason (Illah) must come from the Text not the Mind
No Illah exists in the origin of the rules relating to food, clothing, morals and ritual worships (Ibadat)



Seerah of Muhammed*
*: May the peace blessings and Mercy of Allah be upon him
TMQ: Translation to the nearest meaning of the Qur’an


The Start of the Prophet’s Final Illness
The Prophet publically praises Ali as his ‘Mawla’

Having finished the campaign in the Yemen, the troop of three hundred horses that the Prophet had sent out in Ramadan was now approaching Mecca from the south. Ali had ridden on ahead of his men, eager to meet the Prophet as soon as possible and to make with him the Pilgrimage, which he now had done. Amongst the state's fifth of the spoils there was enough linen to clothe the whole army, but Ali had decided that it must be handed over to the Prophet untouched. In his absence, however, the man he had left in charge was persuaded to lend each man a new change of clothes out of the linen. The change was much needed for they had been away from home for nearly three months. When they were not far from entering the city, Ali rode out to meet them and was amazed to see the transformation that had taken place. “I gave them the garments,” said the deputy commander, “that their appearance might be more seemly when they entered in among the people.” The men all knew that everyone in Mecca would now be wearing their finest clothes in honour of the Feast, and they were anxious to look their best. But Ali felt he could not countenance such a liberty and he ordered them to put on their old clothes again and return the new ones to the spoils as these were for Sadaqa only. Great resentment was felt throughout the army on this account, and when the Prophet heard of it he said: "O people, blame not 'Ali, for he is too scrupulous in the path of God to be blamed." But these words were not sufficient, or it may be that they were only heard by a few, and the resentment continued.
On the way back to Medina one of the troops bitterly complained of Ali to the Prophet, whose face changed colour. "Am I not nearer to the believers than their own selves?" he said; and when the man assented, he added: "Whose nearest I am, his nearest Ali is." Later on the journey, when they had halted at Ghadir al-Khumm, he gathered all the people together, and taking 'Ali by the hand he repeated these words, to which he added the prayer: "O God, be the friend (Mawla) of him who is his friend, and the foe of him who is his foe"; and the murmurings against 'Ali were silenced.

The Last Expeditions
The pride of the Byzantine State made it deny Muslims their right to live. The Byzantine arrogance made them even kill those agents of theirs, who embraced Islam. Killing Farwah bin ‘Amr Al-Judhami, who was their agent on Mu’an, was an evidence of their arrogance. Due to that arrogance and presumptuousness of the Byzantines, the Prophet* started to mobilize a great army in Safar in the eleventh year of Al-Hijra and made it under the command of Ussama bin Zaid bin Haritha with orders to have the horses of Muslims tread on the lands bordering Al-Balqa’ and Ad-Darum of Palestine. His aim was to terrorize Byzantines and to implant confidence into the hearts of Arabs who were settled at the borders of the Byzantines. His other purpose was to deliver a message to everybody there, so that no one may dare say that the Church brutality can’t go with impunity; and that Islamization is not synonymous with fear and vulnerability.
The leadership of Ussama was subject to criticism. Because he was still too young, people tarried at joining his expedition. The Prophet* addressed people saying: "No wonder now you contest his leadership, for you have already contested the ex- leadership of his father. Yes, by Allah, his father, who was one of the most beloved people to me, was quite efficient for leadership; and this son of his is one of the most beloved individuals to me after his father."
So people started tending towards Ussama and joined his army. The anxiety-provoking news about the Prophet’s sickness, however, made the expedition tarry again in order to know what Allah had willed as regards His Messenger*. It was Allah’s Will that Ussama’s expedition would be the first one dispatched during the caliphate of Abu Bakr.

The Prophet prays for the Muslims in the Cemetry and Martyrs of Uhud
On one occasion a remark of his when he was with his wives was sufficiently ominous to prompt the question as to which of them would be the first to rejoin him in the next world. He replied: "She of the longest reach will be the soonest of you to join me,"! whereupon they set about measuring their arms, one against another. Presumably, though it is not recorded, Sawdah was the winner of this contest, for she was the tallest of them and in general the largest. Zaynab, on the other hand, was a small woman, with an arm to match. But it was Zaynab who died first of them all, some ten years later. Only then did they realise that by "she of the longest reach" the Prophet had meant the most giving, for Zaynab was exceedingly generous, like her predecessor of the same name who had been called "the mother of the poor".
One night, not long after the Prophet had ordered preparations for the Syrian campaign and before the army had left, he called to a freedman of his in the small hours, Abu Muwayhibah, and said: "I have been commanded to pray forgiveness for the people of the cemetery, so come thou with me." They went out together, and when they reached the Baqeeha the Prophet said: "Peace be on you, O people of the graves. Rejoice in your state, how much better it is than the state of men now living. Dissensions come like waves of darkest night, the one following hard upon the other, each worse than the last." Then he turned to Abu Muwayhibah and said: "I have been offered the keys of the treasuries of this world and immortality therein followed by Paradise, and I have been given the choice between that and meeting my Lord and Paradise." "O dearer than my father and my mother," said Abu Muwayhibah, "take the keys of the treasuries of this world and immortality therein followed by Paradise." But he answered him saying: "I have already chosen the meeting with my Lord and Paradise." Then he prayed for forgiveness for the people of the Baqeeha.

The Start of the Disease
On Monday the twenty-ninth of Safar in the eleventh year of Al- Hijra, he participated in funeral rites in Al-Baqeeha‘. On the way back he had a headache, his temperature rose so high that the heat effect could be felt over his headband. He led the Muslims in prayer for eleven days though he was sick. The total number of his sick days were either thirteen or fourteen.

The Prophet tells the Muslims about his Choice and the Prophet supports Abu Bakr
It was at dawn that day, or perhaps the next day, that his head ached as he had never known it to ache, but he none the less went to the Mosque and after leading the prayer he mounted the pulpit and invoked blessings on the martyrs of Uhud, as if it was said afterwards – he were doing it for the last time. Then he said: "There is a slave amongst the slaves of God unto whom God hath offered the choice between this world and that which is with Him, and the slave hath chosen that which is with God." When he said this Abu Bakr wept, for he knew that the Prophet was speaking of himself and that the choice meant imminent death. The Prophet saw that he had understood, and telling him not to weep, he said: "0 people, the most beneficent of men unto me in his companionship and in that which his hand bestows is Abu Bakr; and if I were to take from all mankind an inseparable friend he would be Abu Bakr -but companionship and brotherhood of faith is ours until God unite us in His Presence." It was on that occasion that he said, looking round at the multiple entrances into the Mosque from the private houses which surrounded it: "Behold these doors that intrude upon the Mosque. Let them be walled up, save only the door of Abu Bakr."!Before leaving the pulpit he said:"I go before you, and I am your witness. Your tryst with me is at the Pool,' which verily I behold from here where now I stand. I fear not for you that ye will set up gods beside God; but I fear for you this world, lest ye seek to rival one another in worldly gains."

The Last Week
From the Mosque he went back to the apartment of Maymunah, whose turn it was to house him. The effort of speech to the congregation had increased his fever; and after an hour or two, wishing to let 'A'ishah know that he was ill, he went briefly to visit her. She also was suffering from a headache, and when he entered her room she moaned: "Oh my head!" "Nay, 'A'ishah," said the Prophet, "it is oh my head!" But he looked at her searchingly, as if to seek some sign of mortal sickness in her face, and finding none he said: "I wished that it might be" -he meant her death " whilst yet I was alive, that I might ask forgiveness for thee and invoke mercy upon thee and shroud thee and pray over thee and bury thee." 'A'ishah could see that he was ill and she was alarmed at the tone of his voice, but she tried to make light of it, and succeeded in bringing a brief smile to his face. Then he repeated: "Nay, but it is oh my head,"; and returned to Maymunah.
He tried to do as he did when he was well, and continued to lead the prayers in the Mosque as usual; but his illness increased, until the hour came when he could pray only in a sitting position, and he told the congregation that they also should pray seated. On his return to the apartment of the wife whose day it was, he asked her "Where am I tomorrow?" and she named the wife to whom he would go. "And where the day after tomorrow?" he asked. Again she answered; but struck by his insistence, and sensing that he was impatient to be with 'A'ishah, she told the other wives, whereupon they all came to him and said: "9 Messenger of God, we have given our days with you unto our sister 'A'ishah."! He accepted their gift, but was now too weak to walk unaided, so 'Abbas and 'Ali helped him to 'A'ishah's apartment.
When his sickness grew severe he asked his wives: "Where shall I stay tomorrow?" "Where shall I stay?" They understood what he wanted. So they allowed him to stay  wherever he wished. He moved to ‘Aishah’s room leaning — while he was walking — on Al- Fadl bin Al-‘Abbas and ‘Ali bin Abi Talib. Head banded as he was, he dragged his feet till he came into her abode. It was there that he spent the last week of his life. During that period, ‘Aishah used to recite Al-Mu‘awwidhat (Chapters 113 and 114 of the Qur’an) and other supplications which he had already taught her.

Main Topic (Fiqh):
Fiqh - What is Qiyas (Divine Analogy)

The following is quite technical but needs to be clear as the rules surrounding this are complex. Hence, I’ve copied most of the important bits but in summary: QIYAS is using a specified reason found in Qur'an or Sunnah, and applying that reason to a new situation that has no clear rule in Qur'an or Sunnah

The meaning of Qiyas
The linguistic meaning of Qiyas is means estimation, measuring or ascertaining the length, weight, or quality of something, which is why scales are called miqyas. As a juristic term Qiyas the majority of Ulema have defined Qiyas as, the application to a new case (far'), on which the law is silent, of the ruling (Hukm) of an original case (asl) because of the effective reason ('Illa) which is in common to both.’
The following is an example of Qiyas:
O you who have attained faith! When the call to prayer is sounded on the day of congregation (Friday), hasten to the remembrance of Allah, and leave all worldly commerce: this is for your own good, if you but knew it. And when the prayer is ended, disperse freely on Earth and seek to obtain Allah’s bounty; but remember Allah often, so that you might attain to a happy state!” (TMQ al-Juma’: 9-10)
The Ayah mentions that, when the call to prayer is given, one should disengage from all worldly commerce. The Ayah doesn’t mention to stop such acts as eating, resting, or anything else other than conducting business. The Ayah mentions that when the prayer is over, disperse and seek Allah’s bounty. This means that there is a reason to leave the commerce, being that if we do not, then we will be preoccupied and will forget the prayer.
The application of Qiyas for this example would be for any other activity besides commerce. This is because the Illah (missing the Juma’ prayer) occurs due to these activities as well. Therefore, working, playing, eating etc. are prohibited in the time of Juma’ because all of these activities prevent Muslims from performing the Juma’ prayer.


Daleel indicating the Authority of Qiyas
The evidence that Qiyas is a source of Shar'iah is that the Illah is based upon or derived from a Shari’ text. These Shari’ texts are the Quran, the Sunnah, or Ijma' as-Sahabah. These three have been proven as definitive sources of Shari’ah upon which no one can disagree upon. Therefore, the evidence that the Illah exists in the text in general is definitive (Qata’i) and this is also the case for Qiyas. When a text mentions a reason for a rule, extending this rule to any other issue having the same reason is considered another application for the text of the Ayah or Hadith.
The Prophet* demonstrated Qiyas and considered it as a Shari’ Daleel. The Sahabah followed him in this regard, and they also considered Qiyas as a Shari’ Daleel to extract rules. The Prophet* said to Mu'adh and Abu Musa al-Ashari when he appointed them as judges in Yemen: “What will you judge with?” They said, “If we do not find the rule in the Book or the Sunnah, we will compare the unknown issue with the known issue, and we will apply it.” (Ihkam of Amidi)
The Prophet* also demonstrated Qiyas in the following Hadith: The Messenger* said to a Sahabiyah when she asked regarding making Hajj on behalf of her father, "If your father owed a debt and you paid it for him, would that suffice?" She said, "Yes." He said, "The same is for the debt of Allah."
In order to instruct the Muslims, the Prophet* showed the Muslims how to compare the debt owed to Allah to that owed to a human being, such that paying it back fulfills the obligation. Thus, the rule confirms the acceptance of the settlement of the debt. On the other hand, the rule of the known Hukm may be one of negation. For example, Umer asked the Prophet* regarding whether or not the kiss of a fasting person would break the fast. The Messenger* said: "What if you rinse your mouth, does that break the fast? He replied No’" (Ahmad)
The Prophet* showed Umer how to perform Qiyas by comparing the kiss of the fasting person to the rinsing of the mouth and showing that neither breaks the fast.
The existence of an Illah constitutes the common matter upon which comparisons take place. The following Hadith is another illustration of the concept of Illah in Qiyas: When the Messenger* was asked about the trading of mature dates with dry dates, he asked: "Do the mature dates become lighter (in weight) if they dry up?" They said, "Yes." He said, "Then, no." (Daraqtuni) Based upon the Illah, the Prophet* demonstrated Qiyas by extending the rule of Riba to trading mature dates with dry dates.
Ibn Abbas narrated, "A woman said, 'O Prophet, my mother died owing a vow to fast; should I fast for her?' He* said: “What if your mother owed a debt and you paid it back for her, would that settle it?’ She said, 'Yes.' He replied, Then, fast for your mother.’” (Muslim)
Also, 'Abdullah ibn Zubair narrated: "A man from Khath'an (a tribe) came to the Prophet* and said, 'My father embraced Islam at an old age, and he cannot ride the camel and at the same time he is obligated to perform Hajj. Should I perform Hajj for him?' The Prophet* said, 'Are you the eldest son?' He said, 'Yes.' The Messenger* replied, 'What if your father owed a debt and you paid it back, would that settle it?' He said, 'Yes.' The Prophet* said, 'Then perform Hajj for him.'" (Ahmad)
In both Ahadith, the Messenger instructed the Muslims how to draw the analogy between the debt of Allah in fasting and Hajj and the debt to a human being. Both of them share the same Illah, which is the existence of a debt that must be paid. As the definition of Qiyas is derived from the Ahadith of the Prophet*, the definition is considered a Hukm Shari’. The rule that is extracted through Qiyas is a Hukm Shari’ that must be followed as any other Hukm Shari’ extracted from other legislative sources. The definitions and general rules which are extracted from the evidences are themselves considered Ahkam Shar'iah.
Qiyas is established upon an Illah, which is the common motive between any two issues. If an Illah exists, then Qiyas can be performed otherwise Qiyas is not possible. According to the strongest opinion the Illah must be stated or derived from a Shari’ text. If this is the case, this Qiyas would be Shari’ because the Illah has been stated by a Shari’ text. According to this view if this Illah has not been stated or derived from a Shari’ text, then the Qiyas cannot be considered valid from a Shari’ perspective nor can it be considered as a valid daleel.
It is documented that the Sahabah used Qiyas in many instances. When Abu Bakr gave inheritance to the maternal grandmother and not the paternal one, some of the Ansar told him: "You have given inheritance to a woman (the maternal grandmother) from a dead person (the grandson) who, if she were the dead person, he would not inherit from her. On the other hand, you left out a woman (the paternal grandmother) who, if she died, this person will inherit from her. So give them the one-sixth of the inheritance."
When Abu Bakr heard this Qiyas, he changed his rule and established the new rule. In another example, Umar doubted applying the death penalty for the group that kills a person. Ali told him: "O Ameer al Mu'mineen. If a group stole, would you cut their hands?" Umar said, "Yes," and Ali replied, "This is the same." Thus, Ali made Qiyas for the death penalty of a group based upon the penalty of theft for a group.
The evidence for Qiyas is the Shari’ah texts which contain Illah. The presence of an Illah entails that we follow the rationale of the text (ma’qool an-nass) of the Kitaab and Sunnah. Since the rationale is not from the mind but the text itself. If the rationale of the text extends to a new matter then we are obliged to extend it, otherwise we would not have followed the text.

The Process of Qiyas
Something is defined as a source in Usul when it serves as a source for new Ahkam (rules). Qiyas is a source because we can extract new Ahkam from it. By extending the original rule to new realities via a shared Illah, leads to new Ahkam for new realities and hence Qiyas is a source. This is one of the ways we can appreciate the capacity of Islam to apply to all times and places as Ahkam can be deduced for new realities and problems.
Qiyas is always built on the following four pillars:
i. Asl (old matter)
ii. Fari’ (new matter)
iii. Hukm (rule)
iv. Illah (effective reason)

For example Allah said: “And make ready against them all you can of power including horses to threaten the enemy of Allah.” (TMQ Al-Anfal: 60)
The Hukm given in the verse is that preparation is an obligation. The old matter is horses. The Illah is to terrify the enemy of Allah. As for the new matter, it is anything that will realise the Illah of the preparation, which is to terrify the enemy. So these days it would be obligatory to have tanks, fighter planes, and aircraft carries since they terrify the enemy. Not only that, the Illah obliges the Islamic State prepare in the following areas:
a) The arms development and war industry must be the strongest of its age if it is to fulfill the Illah of terrifying the enemy.
b) The state cannot depend on others for its sources of power and hence it has to strive to develop its own weapons and armaments.
c) It should have new sophisticated weapons which will strike fear in the hearts of the enemy.
There are specific guidelines and requirements for Qiyas explained in the books of Usul al-Fiqh. One such guideline is that there should be no existing ruling from the Qur’an, Sunnah and Ijma’ as-Sahabah for the new case.
Example:
Does a woman have to remove the nail polish before performing Wudhu? Some people claim she does not have to remove the nail polish in order to do Wudhu, and they justify it by doing Qiyas on the performance of Masah (wiping over the socks).
Qiyas cannot be performed in this situation because the Ayah regarding Wudhu explicitly orders to wash all parts of the hands, and polish prevents water from reaching the nails. In the case of Masah (wiping over the socks) the text is not presented with an Illah (legal reason) and cannot be extended to other things. Thus, Qiyas can be practiced in this issue.
Some of the other requirements for Qiyas are that the original ruling has to be from Qur’an, Sunnah and Ijma’ as-Sahabah, not from another Qiyas. In addition, the texts of the Qur’an, Sunnah and Ijma’ as-Sahabah must contain the justification for the ruling. We cannot use our Aql (intellect) to come up with the cause (Illah).

Illah from the Text or the Mind?
The strongest position is that the Illah must be from the text. This is because the mind is not capable to determining the reasons for the rules unless they have been revealed by Allah. The Illah is the daleel which allowed the extension of the rule to a new matter. For this rule to be a Hukm Shar’i i.e. a valid ruling of the Shar’iah, it must be taken from the speech (Khitaab) of the Legislator since the definition of Hukm Shar’i is the speech of the Legislator relating to man’s actions. Any rule which is not from the speech of the legislator is rejected because it is not revelation (Wahiy) and we are ordered only to follow the Wahiy in our actions. To extend the rule without a textual Illah would be like extending the prohibition of alcohol to vinegar just because vinegar originates from alcohol. Alcohol is one reality and vinegar is another. One cannot arbitrarily extend the Hukm without the text allowing such an extension. If the text allows it through an Illah, then this is a valid Hukm Shar’i, if not then it is a rational judgment which has no value in the Shar’iah.
This is notwithstanding the fact that man is unable to give judgment on that which he cannot sense. If the Creator did not provide us the reason (Illah) for the legislation of the rule then how can man judge it. Thus, not only is the rational Illah rejected from the viewpoint of Hukm shar’i but it is practically impossible for man to give such a judgment in the first place.
Furthermore, the fact that the mind cannot make analogy without a Shar’i Illah is aptly demonstrated by the reality of the Shari’ah rules themselves. For example, we find similar realities are given different Ahkam while different realities are given the same Hukm. The mind can normally make analogy between similar things but the text contradicts this principle: So in the absence of water, of all things dust are sufficient to make Wudhu even though they are two different things. According to the Shari’ah rules if a baby girl urinates on clothes then the clothes must be washed but if a baby boy does the same then it is sufficient just to sprinkle some water on it. Thus, similarity does not mean the same Hukm just as dissimilarity does not mean a different Hukm. So how can the mind make analogy for the sake of new Ahkam when even the existing Ahkam cannot be rationalised without a Shar’i Illah?

The areas of Ahkam Shari’ah which do not contain Illah
According to the strongest view no Illah exists in the Asl (origin) of the rules relating to:
- food,
- clothing,
- morals and
- ritual worships (Ibadat)

This is due to two reasons:
a) By a scrutiny of the texts we found that they do not contain Illah.
b) These rules are not related to achieving results in this life.
The divine rules related to Ibadat (worships), Mat’umaat (foodstuffs), Malboosaat (clothing) or Akhlaq (morals) cannot be reasoned by Illah. The primary motive for these actions is worship and hence there are no tangible results that we seek since the results are in the Hereafter. They should be taken as they came in the text and should not be based upon an Illah. Thus, prayer, fasting, pilgrimage, Zakah, the method of praying (Salah), the number of its rak'at, the rites of pilgrimage (hajj) and the minimum amount of property liable to payment of Zakah (Nisab of Zakah), and the like should be taken, accepted and submitted to as they came in the text (Tawkifiyyah) and no Illah is sought for them. The same applies to the prohibition of eating the meat of a dead animal, pork and the like. Seeking Illah for these rules is wrong and dangerous, because if an Illah was sought the result would be that if the Illah of the rule ceased to exist then the rule would no longer exist. This is because the Illah is connected to the rule in existence and absence.
As an example, if we assumed cleanliness was the Illah for the Wudhu (ablution), and physical exercise as the Illah for prayer, and good digestion as the Illah for fasting etc., then in these situations whenever the Illah doesn't exist, the rule would not exist either, this would lead us to abandoning these shari’ah rules. Another example would be if someone raised a clean pig which they had fed with good food and kept in a hygienic manner, would we then be permitted to eat it? Of course that would not make it permissible. Therefore seeking an Illah is dangerous for the rule and its performance. Thus, it is obligatory to take rules of Ibadat as they are, without seeking an Illah for them.
However in the Furu’ (branches) of worship Illah’s may exist because certain tangible results are sought. For example, Jihad is from the rules of worship (Ibadat) but its performance entails certain tangible results and hence there is a propensity for Illah’s to exist. So preparation for Jihad is a tangible result which is sought and it does contain an Illah which is to terrify the enemy.
The morals (Akhlaq) are values for which rules have been established to illustrate the virtues and noble deeds and their opposite. They also result from Ibadat, as well as being observed in Mu'amalat. This is because Islam aims in its legislation to take man on the road towards perfection, so as to reach the highest achievable level. Therefore man has to work towards acquiring the supreme qualities and to maintain them. The good moral is a value which is intended to be achieved because it is one which Shar’a has stated, and its value is targeted when performing these virtues and acquiring them. Morals are a part of the Islamic Shari’ah, and a part of the commands and prohibitions of Allah, which must be achieved by every Muslim so that his performance of Islam becomes complete, and his undertaking of the commands and prohibitions of Allah is perfected.
A Muslim should not acquire morals for the sake of morals. An action which man performs might be by itself, bad, but he thought it good, so he performed it. The attribute, which he was characterised with, might be by itself bad, but he considers it a good attribute so he acquired it and thus errors would arise because man performed morals for their own sake. For example, someone may seek to be truthful for the sake of it, therefore when he is captured by the enemy he is truthful to them and gives them all the information regarding the position of the Muslim troops and their strategy even though the Prophet* said: “War is deceit” And Islam prohibits giving information to the enemy that would lead to harming the Muslims.
Unless Islam defines the good attributes and the bad attributes and unless the Muslim performs them according to this definition, then his acquiring of these attributes would not be in compliance with the Ahkam Shari’ah. Therefore, the Muslim should not be characterised with truthfulness for the sake of truthfulness, nor should he be characterised with compassion for the sake of compassion, nor should he be characterised with all the morals for their own sake. Rather he should be characterised with them as commands from Allah, because the fundamental fact is that these morals are based on the Islamic Aqeedah. Observing this issue would guarantee the possession of the morals in individuals, thus purifying the soul of any impurity and distancing it from any corrupting factors. Therefore, the best way to protect morals is to confine them to what is stated in the text (Qur'an and Sunnah).
As for not acquiring morals for the sake of benefit, this is because benefit is not intended of the moral and should not be aimed at, lest it corrupts it and makes it revolve around the benefit. Hence, morals are attributes which man must be characterised with, freely and willingly, by the incentive of Taqwa (the fear of Allah). A Muslim does not abide by morals simply because they benefit or harm him in life, but he does so in response to the commands and prohibitions of Allah. This is the understanding, which makes characterisation with good morals constant and does not revolve around benefit. Such morals built on the exchange of benefit would make the individual a hypocrite, revealing certain behaviour while concealing his true nature. For example, may only be nice to another person because he wants him to buy something from him, but if there is someone who he cannot obtain material benefit from then he would not be nice to him.
Therefore, morals are not reasoned, and Illah should never be invented for them. They must be accepted as they came in Shar’a, irrespective of any Illah. It is erroneous and dangerous to seek Illah for morals, so as not to abandon the characterisation with morals when their Illah has ceased.

Types of Ahkam Shariah where an Illah can be found
As for the Mu’amalaat and Uqubat it is possible that the texts regarding them may contain Illah’s because they generally entail tangible results. For example, Allah ordered the Messenger* to distribute the spoils of war amongst the orphans and the poor. This is a tangible result sought by the Hukm which is open to having an Illah. Even though the Hukm is fulfilled for Allah’s sake the result is still tangible which means that there may be a reason why the poor should receive the booty. The reason here of course is stated in the text: “So that the booty does not become a commodity only between the rich among you.” (TMQ Al-Hashr: 7)
Of course many other texts relating to these areas do not include an Illah at all such as:  “Allah has permitted trade and has forbidden Riba (interest).” (TMQ Al-Baqara: 275)
The rules and evidences regarding the Muslim woman having to wear Khimar (headscarf) and Jilbab, the allowance for man to marry up to four wives at one time, the prohibition of women being rulers and many other rules have come without Illah, therefore these rules should not be reasoned at all and should be taken as they are.
There are four types of Illah:
• Explicit (Saraahatan)
• Implicit (Dalaalatan)
• Derived (Istinbaatan)
• Those derived through analogy (Qiyasan).


Customs and traditions cannot be an Illah
As for the change of traditions and customs of people, this does not have an effect in changing the rule, for the tradition is not an Illah of the Hukm Shar’ai nor a source for it. The traditions may agree or disagree with the Shar’a; If they disagree with the Shar’a then the Shar’a has come to abrogate and change them, since the function of the Shar’a is to change the corrupted traditions and customs, because they are the factors that cause corruption of the society. Therefore, they are not taken as a source for the Hukm Shar’ai nor an Illah for it. However, if the traditions were in agreement with Shar’a, then the rule is proved by its Shar’ai evidence and by its Shar’ai Illah and not by these traditions, even if these traditions do not contradict the Shar’a. Hence, customs cannot rule over the Shar’a, rather the Shar’a rules over the traditions and customs. Accordingly, the Ahkam Shar'iah have their own evidence which is the text and they have Shar’ai Illah and the traditions and customs are not a part of that at all.

Difference between Manaat al-Hukm (reality of the rule) and Illah
For example, alcohol is Haram, the divine law is the prohibition of alcohol. The investigation that a certain drink is alcohol or not, so as to judge it as Haram or not is an investigation of the Manaat. It is necessary to study whether the drink is alcohol or not in order to state that it is Haram. This investigation of the reality of alcohol is a verification of the Manaat. Another example is the divine law that the Mutlaq (absolute, unrestricted) water is the one which is allowed for Wudhu. So the investigation as to whether the water is unrestricted or restricted in order to judge upon it as allowed for Wudhu, is a verification of the Manaat. Therefore, it is necessary to study the water to determine if it is free or restricted. This study of the reality of the water is simply the verification of the Manaat and nothing to do with the Illah of the Hukm. Similarly, a person who made Hadath (discharged something from back or front) has to make Wudhu for the prayer, therefore the verification that the person is Mohdath (impure) or not Mohdath is a verification of the Manaat.
The investigation of the Illah is related to the understanding of the text from the Ayat or Ahadith and therefore it is the work of a qualified Mujtahid. Whereas the verification of the Manaat such as the verification of whether a liquid is alcohol is the investigation of the reality of a thing that is the subject of the Shari’ah. Accordingly, it is not a condition that the one who verifies the Manaat be a Mujtahid or a Muslim, but it is enough that he or she to be knowledgeable of the matter.

Children’s Feedback

The importance of water and not wasting it
Sharing
Dawah – What is it and how to  do it (part1)


News Topic:
Nil

Bank of Akhirah:
Parents and Children were asked to think about anything they have done over the past week purely for the sake of Allah, with Ihsaan and sincerity. Thus seeking the pleasure of Allah alone. Then put these on a piece of paper and put it in the cardboard Kaaba at the start of the next Study Circle.
Please write them anonymously.


Reminder
Quiz sometime after Christmas (i/A)


Homework
Seerah ~ REVISE FOR THE QUIZ
Belief ~ How do we derive / make laws in Islam ? What is the process of lawmaking?


Tuesday, 14 February 2012

12 February 2012
Refuting magic on Prophet, Khaibar (p1), Hadith 36 (p1)

Seerah of Muhammed*
*: May the Peace, Blessings and Mercy of Allah be upon him
TMQ: Translation to the nearest meaning of the Qur’an



Refuting the story of magic on the Prophet* and The start of the Khaibar Campaign
The story of magic on the Prophet

The following story is mentioned in the biography of the Prophet* compiled by Martin Lings. I will print what he says (based upon hadith) and then mention why many scholars do not believe this to be authentic.
In these same weeks after the return of the pilgrims there was an attack on the Prophet's life by a means which had not yet been used against him. In every generation of the Jews in Arabia there could be found one or two adepts in the science of magic; and one of these was amongst the Jews still living in Medina, Labid by name, an expert sorcerer who had also instructed his daughters in the subtle art lest his own knowledge should die with him. Labid now received a heavy bribe to put as deadly a spell as he could upon the Prophet*. For this purpose he needed some combings of his hair, which he or one of his daughters contrived to procure, possibly through the intermediary of an entirely innocent person. He tied eleven knots in the hair, and his daughters breathed imprecations upon each knot. Then he attached it to a sprig from a male date-palm which had on it the outer sheath of the pollen, and threw it into a deep well. The spell could only be undone by the untying of the knots.
The Prophet* was soon aware that something was seriously wrong. On the one hand his memory began to fail him, while on the other hand he began to imagine that he had done things which in fact he had not done. He was also overcome with weakness, and when food was pressed upon him he could not bring himself to eat. He prayed God to cure him, and in his sleep he was conscious of two persons, one sitting at his head and the other at his feet. He heard one of them inform the other of the exact cause of his infirmity and of the name of the well. When he woke Gabriel came to him, and confirming his dream he gave him two surahs of the Qur’an, one of which contains five verses and the other six. The Prophet* sent 'Ali to the well, telling him to recite over it the two surahs. At each verse one of the knots untied itself until all were untied and the Prophet* recovered his full strength of mind and body.' The Prophet* ordered the well to be filled up and another to be dug near at hand to replace it. He sent for Labid, who confessed to having placed the spell upon him for the sake of a bribe, but he did not take any action against him.
The first of the two surahs is: ‘Say: I take refuge in the Lord of daybreak from the evil of that which He hath created, and from the evil of dusk when it dimmeth into night, and from the evil of the women who breathe upon knots, and from the evil of the envier when he envieth,' The second is: Say: I take refuge in the Lord of men, The King of men, the God of men, from the evil of the stealthy whisperer, who whispers in the breasts of men; from Jinn and from men.'
According to many authorities these two surahs which were recited on this occasion were not then newly revealed but had been given to the Prophet* in Mecca before the Hijrah.
These surahs are placed last of all in the Qur’an. They are called "the two takings of refuge", and are recited continually for protection against all manner of evil.

Comment
There are khabar ahad (singular) narrations that say the Prophet* was affected by magic but the meaning of these cannot be accepted as they contradict the definite matter of infallibility of the Prophet* and that he could not be influenced by Shaitan or evil in any way. The Prophet* is infallible with regards to the Deen. Furthermore, if a speculative (zanni) matter contradicts a definitive (qati) matter then the definitive must be taken even if there is a zanni narration upon the issue. This means that we should accept the principle of infallibility of the Prophet(s) above any narration as there may be error in the narration.
Secondly, the actual authenticity of the narrations regarding magic influencing the Prophet* themselves have been doubted by scholars. We talked about this topic when discussing ‘The Satanic Verses’ many months ago.
We find that the chains of transmission of this story can be divided into two categories:
A) Hisham – his father ‘Urwah – ‘Aishah
From Hisham several people (Yahya, ‘Isa, Abu Usamah, Ibn Numayr etc) narrate the story, so we can take it back to him with considerable confidence. But we have no way to verify that Hisham heard the story from ‘Urwah, since he is the only one to attribute it to him. And if we do accept that Hisham did relate it from ‘Urwah we cannot be sure that ‘Urwah heard it from ‘Aishah, since he is the only one to attribute it to her.
Hisham was a resident of Medina, although he later moved to Iraq and died there. Imam Malik, also from Medina quotes many traditions from him but he does not quote this one. One explanation of this fact is that when he was residing in Medina in early part of his life Hisham either did not know this story or he did not give credence to it. It is reported by scholars that Hisham became very feeble-minded in his later years. Thus ‘Uqayli says: he mentally degenerated in the last part of his life. It may be that Hisham heard the story from some unreliable narrators in his earlier years and in his later years his feeble-mindedness led him to attribute it to ‘Urwah. This would explain why no other narrator transmits the story from ‘Urwah or from ‘Aishah. This is one explanantion.
B) The second category of chains of transmission has: Abu Mu‘awiyah – al-A‘mash – Yazid bin Hayyan – Zayd bin Arqam
These chains are even more problematic than those from ‘Aishah. They are found only in two of the nine collections of Hadith: Nasa`i and Ahmad and allow us to take the hadith back with some confidence only to Abu Mu‘awiyah who died in 195. We have only his word that al-A‘mash (d. 147) narrated the story and the same is true about two earlier narrators: Yazid bin Hayyan and Zayd bin Arqam.
To conclude, although these stories are mentioned in some books of hadith we reject the stories partly because they contradict the Qur’anic promise of Allah to protect His Messenger and partly due to the weakness in the chain of narrators. Hence, there is doubt both in the text and transmission.

The Start of the Khaibar Campaign
Khaibar was a spacious strongly fortified territory, studded with castles and farms, lying at a distance of 60-80 miles north of Medina, now a village known for its uncongenial climate. After Al- Hudaibiyah Treaty, the major party of the anti-Islam tripartite coalition — Quraish, the bedouin horde of Najd tribes and the Jews — was neutralized, therefore, the Prophet* deemed it an appropriate time to settle his affairs with the other two wings — the Jews and the Najd tribes — in order that peace and security could prevail and the Muslims may devote their time and effort in propagating the Message of Allah and calling people to embrace it. Khaibar itself had always remained a hotbed of intrigue and conspiracy, and the Jews had always constituted it a source of military provocations and war instigation centre, so it was given a top priority on the agenda of the Prophet’s compelling exigencies. The Jews of Khaibar had united by an ancient alliance with the Confederates, triggered Bani Quraiza to practise treachery, maintained contacts with Ghatafan and the Arabians and they even devised an attempt at the Prophet’s life. In fact, the continual afflictions that the Muslims had sustained were primarily attributable to the Jews. Envoys were repeatedly sent to them for peaceful settlement, but all in vain. Consequently the Prophet* came to the conclusion that a military campaign was a must in order to forestall their hostilities. Interpreters of the Noble Qur’an suggest that capturing Khaibar had been a Divine promise implied in Allah’s Words: · “Allah has promised you abundant spoils that you will capture, and He has hastened for you this.” [48:20] i.e., Al-Hudaibiyah Peace Treaty and the surrender of Khaibar.
The hypocrites and people weak of heart had hung back from joining the true Muslims in Al- Hudaibiyah campaigns, so now Allah, the All-Mighty inculcated the following words in His Prophet’s ears: · “Those who lagged behind will say, when you set forth to take the spoils, ‘Allow us to follow you.’ They want to change Allah’s Words. Say: ‘You shall not follow us; thus Allah has said beforehand.’ Then they will say: ‘Nay, you envy us.’ Nay, but they understand not except a little.” [48:15]
For this reason, the Prophet* invited only those who were willing to fight in the cause of Allah to accompany him in his march against Khaibar. 1400 men only, who had sworn allegiance in response to his call. Meanwhile, Siba‘ bin ‘Arfatah Al-Ghifari was chosen to run the affairs of Medina.
The hypocrites of Arabia took notice of the fresh Islamic intentions so they began to alert the Jews to the imminent military activities. Their chief, ‘Abdullah bin Ubai delegated an envoy to the Jews of Khaibar warning them against the d angers approaching, and nerving them to resist the Muslims as they outnumbered the latter and were better equipped. On hearing the news the Jews despatched Kinanah bin Abi Al-Huqaiq and Haudha bin Qais to their former allies, the tribe of Ghatafan requesting military assistance, promising to grant them half the yield of the fruit that their farms could yield if they managed to beat the Muslims.
The Prophet* marched by way of Isra Mountain and then went forward with the army till he halted in a valley called Ar-Raji‘, encamping between Khaibar and Ghatafan so as to prevent the latter from reinforcing the Jews. The guides accompanying him led him to an intersection from which branched out three roads with different designations; all leading to his destination. He abstained from following the first two roads on grounds of their ominous designation and chose the third for its propitious indications.

Amr bin Al-Akwa’s martyrdom
It has been narrated on the authority of Salamah bin Al-Akwa‘, who said: We marched upon Khaibar with the Messenger of Allah*. We journeyed during the night. One of the men said to my brother ‘Amir: Won’t you recite to us s ome of your verses, ‘Amir? So he began to chant his verses to urge the camels, reciting: O Allah, if You had not guided us, We would have neither been guided rightly nor practised charity, nor offered prayers. We wish to lay down our lives for You; so forgive You our lapses, And keep us steadfast when we encounter (our enemies). Bestow upon us peace and tranquillity, Behold, when with a cry they called upon us to help.
The Messenger of Allah* said: “Who is this driver (of the camels)?” They said: “It is ‘Amir.” He said: “Allah will show mercy to him.” A man said: “Martyrdom is reserved for him; O Messenger of Allah, would that you had allowed us to benefit ourselves from his life.” The Prophet’s Companions had already known that he would never invoke Allah’s mercy upon a close Companion but to single him out for martyrdom.
The Prophet* began the campaign by reducing the minor strongholds one after the other. The first fort he was to attack was Na‘im, the first defence line with a formidable strategic position. Marhab, the leader of the fort, invited ‘Amr bin Al-Akwa‘ to meet him in combat and the latter responded; when ‘Amr struck the Jew, his sword recoiled and wounded his knee, and he died of that wound. Some people claimed, based on this action, that Amir ‘commited suicide and lost all his good deeds’ and this made Salamah unhappy. The Prophet* noticed this and later said: “For him (‘Amir) there is a double reward in the Hereafter.” He indicated this by putting two of his fingers together. ‘Ali bin Abi Talib then undertook to meet Marhab in combat, and managed to kill him. Yasir, Marhab’s brother, then turned up challenging the Muslims to a fight. Az-Zubair was equal to it and killed him on the spot. Real fighting then broke out and lasted for a few days. The Jews showed courage and proved to be too formidable even to the repeated rushes of the veteran soldiers of Islam. However, they later realized the futility of resistance and began to abandon their positions in An-Na‘im and infiltrate into the fortress of As-Sa‘b.


Hadith:
First half of Nawawi's 40 Hadith, Number 36
Hadith 36: Part 1 ~ Helping Brother Muslims 
Hadith No.36 (Nawawi's 40 Hadith): On the authority of Abu Huraira from the Prophet* who said: “Whoever relieves a believer’s distress of the distressful aspects of this world, Allah will rescue him from a difficulty of the difficulties of the Hereafter. Whoever alleviates [the situation of] one in dire straits who cannot repay his debt, Allah will alleviate his lot in both this world and in the Hereafter. Whoever conceals [the faults of] a Muslims, Allah will conceal [his faults] in this life and the Hereafter. Allah is helping the servant as long as the servant is helping his brother. Whoever follows a path in order to seek knowledge thereby, Allah will make easy doe him, due to it, a path to Paradise. No people gather together in a house of the houses of Allah, reciting the Book of Allah and studying it among themselves, except that tranquillity descended upon them, mercy covers them, the angels surround them and Allah makes mention of them to those in His presence. Whoever is slowed by his deeds will not be hastened forward by his lineage.”[Muslim]

We see that in this hadith the obligations towards other Muslims are emphasised and the fulfilment of brotherhood is again stressed. The previous hadith talks about the prohibitions regarding a Muslim’s duties towards their fellow Muslims, and this talks about the more positive elements of Brotherhood and its responsibilities. This is a great hadith that encompasses all the branches of Knowledge, and the Principles [of the Religion], and the Excellent Manners. In it is found the virtue of fulfilling the needs of the Muslims, and benefitting them, from what is possible for one, of Knowledge, or wealth, or aid, or guidance towards that which will correct their affairs, or advice.

“Whoever alleviates [the situation of] one in dire straits who cannot repay his debt, Allah will alleviate his lot in both this world and in the Hereafter.”
The Day of Judgement will be a very difficult day with many hardships. The only way to be rescued from difficulties on that Day is by obtaining the grace and mercy of Allah, all praises and glory be to Him. In this part of the hadith, the Prophet* has informed us about one of the ways in which we can attain the mercy of Allah. Relieving our fellow Muslim of their debt is an act beloved to Allah that may earn us His mercy, and an alleviation from trials in this world and the Hereafter. Here, it is not wise or appropriate for a Muslim to demand his money back from a poor or needy Muslim who honestly cannot afford to pay him. He should either give him a chance until he is able to repay his money or forgive him.
There are basically two ways in which we can relieve another’s debt. If we have leant money, and we know that someone is not able to repay the loan, we can wait until they have the means to repay it. This is in fact an obligation commanded by Allah, when He says: “And if the debtor is on straitened circumstances, then grant him time until it is easy for him to repay” (2:280)  A second option would be to reduce the debt or forgive it completely, and that is better for us, as Allah says: “But of you remit it [the debt] by way of charity, that is better for you if you did but know. And be afraid of the Day when you shall be brought back to Allah. Then every person shall be paid what he earned, and they shall not be dealt with unjustly” (2:281)
Also included is the concept is giving the one in debt charity or a gift to help them pay off their debts. The Prophet* said regarding this: “Whoever would be pleased to have Allah save him from distress on the Day of Resurrection should then relieve one in straitened circumstances or completely remove his debt.” (Muslim)  Ibn Uthaimeen points out that if a Muslim does the opposite of this, and demands the debt, making life difficult for that person, then Allah may make life difficult him both in this life and the next. We can see that caring for our fellow Muslims, and seeking to alleviate their stresses and strains, be they financial or otherwise, not only serves to strengthen the ties of the brotherhood and sisterhood, and alleviate distress, it also benefits us though the removal of trials and tribulations either in this world, or on the Day of Judgement. The Prophet*, says in one of his great hadiths: "A man of the previous nations was very rich and people used to borrow money from him. Not only did he lend them money, which is indeed a good deed, but he also asked his sons to alleviate and forgive those who could not repay the money." The Prophet*, says that in the Hereafter Allah will reward him and forgive his sins because of his generosity. Allah says in Surah al-Furqan, Ayah 26 that "it will be a very hard day for the disbelievers". This means that there is a situation where a person who is kind to those in need and Allah will relief that person by rewarding him a great reward from Allah's Mercy and Help.

“Whoever conceals [the faults of] a Muslim, Allah will conceal [his faults] in this life and the Hereafter.”
The matter of concealing the faults of others is mentioned in numerous hadith of the Prophet*. In particular, we find the following: “O gathering who believe with their tongues but faith has yet to enter into their hearts, do not backbite the Muslims. And do not search into their private matters. Whoever searches for their private matters will have Allah follow up his private matters. And whose private matters Allah follows, He will expose him even [if his act were done] in his house.” (Ahmad and Abu Dawood)
And this is with regards to hiding the sins that they may have committed in the past, and which are over. On the other hand, if they are caught red-handed performing a sin then it is obligatory to admonish them and forbid them from it. And if they are unable to do so, then they must raise the matter to the Authorities, if they do not fear any evil repercussions from this. In general, a believer in Allah and the Last Day, would not like their mistakes and faults to be broadcast to others. If we make a mistake or commit a sin, it is better that we keep the matter to ourselves and ask Allah for forgiveness than to tell others about we have done, perhaps inadvertently encouraging them to do the same. If, may Allah forgive us, we are happy at having committed the sin, then it is a sign of a shortcoming in our faith, and we should repent to Allah and ask Him to guide us to what is better. Allah, all praises and glory be to Him has told us in the Qur’an: “Verily, those who like that lewd sinful acts should propagated among those who believe, they will have a painful torment in this world and in the Hereafter” (Surah al-Noor:19)
Those Whose Sins Should be Concealed
There are essentially two types of people. One is religious and performs the obligatory and recommended acts and remains away from what is forbidden. The other openly admits commits sins and acts that are forbidden by the shariah. In the light of the teachings of this hadith, the actions with respect to each type of person is different. The first type of person, who is not known to commit sins, should have shortcomings concealed by others. However, conditions must be met for this approach to be followed:
1) The sin that the person committed must be one related to the ‘rights of Allah’ and not the rights of mankind. That is, if you see them do something that will not harm anyone else, you should conceal that. But if what they are doing concerns others, such as stealing, then you cannot remain silent because another person’s rights have been violated.
2) The sin must have already been finished. In other words, if see someone in the act of committing a sin, you should try to stop them, even if it means telling others about it, but if the acts is done, then it should be concealed.
3) The person whose fault is being concealed must be a religious person who is not known to perform evil deeds, thus the act could be considered a slip.
4) The concealment must not be in a situation where one has been called to be a witness to what has occurred, or to the character of the accused.
5) The benefit of concealing the person’s sin must outweigh the benefit of letting the sin be known. If the benefit and the harm seem of an equal level, the sin should be concealed.
According to ibn Rajab, the one who comes privately to the authorities, full of repentance and sorrow, asking for punishment without explicitly stating which type of sin has been committed, should also have their sin concealed and be told to repent privately to Allah. This was the practice of the Prophet*.
Those Who are Not Deserving of Intercession
The second category of people, who openly and repeatedly commit sins, are not deserving of having their sins concealed. Instead, others should be told about them so that they take precautions against them. They should also be reported to the proper authorities in order to try and curb their evil, and one should not intercede on their behalf. When all this is considered, we can see that this teaching serves to protect the honour of the pious Muslim who may have slipped and committed a sin against the rights of Allah. But if the act committed was against the rights of a person, or committed openly with no shame, then there is no concealment and the action should be dealt with appropriately. Allah is all-Forgiving and He loves to Forgive, and we should never despair of His Mercy, but neither should we openly commit sins or harm the rights of another person, otherwise we cannot hope for Allah to conceal our own faults, in this life, or more importantly, in the Hereafter.

“Allah is helping the servant as long as the servant is helping his brother.”
This statement is a principle. Before this statement, the Prophet*, gives us three examples of Allah helping those who help others. We can see from this statement of the Prophet* that Allah rewards His servants in a manner similar to the deeds that they perform. If we are helping our brother or sister, Allah will help us in return. Some of the virtues of helping one another were discussed in detail in the commentary of Hadith Number 26, but this particular hadith gives us further cause for reflection. Allah promises to be our helper if we help one another, and who could be a better helper than Allah? If Allah is helping us, would we need for anything? This also shows us what the ideal Islamic society should look like. It is a society in which its members help each other and support each other and encourage each other to do what is best. Allah commands us: “Help one another in acts of piety and righteousness. And do not assist each other in acts of sinfulness and transgression. And be aware of Allah. Verily, Allah is severe in punishment” (al-Maaidah:2) Hence we should help each other to do good and avoid helping others in acts that would displease Allah.
A hadith of the Prophet* illustrates the reward of helping one another. Anas narrated that the Prophet* and his Companions were on a journey, and some of the Companions were fasting whilst others were not. Those who were fasting were struggling to perform the chores of feeding the animals and preparing the food and so forth, so those who were not fasting performed these tasks for them. Although fasting is an act that is extremely pleasing to Allah, the Prophet* said of their situation:“Those who were not fasting took all of the reward today.” (al-Bukhari and Muslim) Those who were not fasting received such a great reward because they were helping their brothers who were in need.
Helping one another is not limited to doing a deed on another’s behalf, it also includes the other deeds previously referred to in this hadith, including relieving someone in a distressful situation, relieving debt or interceding on their behalf. We should therefore use our physical and material means as well as other means such as our reputation and authority to help those in need. When we do this, we will find the most blessed of things, Allah as our helper. But should we confine ourselves only to the needy mentioned in the hadith? Of course not. The Prophet*, wants to convey to us that we should help our brothers in any way possible. There are hundreds of forms of need. For example, helping the blind to cross the street or any of the great and charitable acts that are mentioned in Hadiths 25 and 26. The greater the help, the greater the reward. This is something that Muslims should take seriously because if we have a community which care about each other and help one another, then there would be no needy. This should be our attitude - we should seek to be motivated to offer our help at any time to our Muslim brothers.
This is a generalisation whose detailed explanation must include the case where the Slave [of Allah] resolves to help his brother Muslim [by admonishing him], whereupon it becomes required of him not to be cowardly of speaking the Truth to him, believing, all the while, that Allah will help him and protect him from any evil repercussions of doing so.

The second half of the hadith will be covered next week, Insha’Allah

No News Topic

Children's Feedback:
Muslim Inventions: Windmills