Showing posts with label judge. Show all posts
Showing posts with label judge. Show all posts

Friday, 20 February 2015

15 February 2015 - Courtroom Session & Saving from Punishments in the Grave

15 February 2015 - Courtroom Session and Saving from Punishments in the Grave



Lives of the Prophets: Courtroom Cases


Case 1:

The case of 99 Sheep and a good talking man with one man and his only sheep

Case 2:

The case of Sheep grazing in neighbours field destroying his livelihood

Case 3:

The case of a worshipper admiring horses and missing their prayer

Case 4:

The case of what to do with the first batch of Prisoners of War

Case 5:

Mothers disputing about whose child survived the wolf attack


Case 1:

-----------------------
Once Dawud* was in his private chamber which was the best and holiest place in his house. He had ordered that none was to invade his privacy that day. He suddenly found two persons who had climbed over the wall of the private chamber asking him to judge between them.
"Has the Story of the Disputants reached thee?
Behold, they climbed over the wall of the private chamber; when they entered to Dawud* and he was terrified of them, they said: 'Fear not: we are two disputants, one of whom has wronged the other: decide now between us with truth, and treat us not with injustice, but guide us to the even Path.
This man is my brother: he has nine and ninety ewes, and I have (but) one: yet he says: 'Commit her to my care " and he is moreover harsh to me in speech.'
(Dawud*) said: 'He has undoubtedly wronged thee in demanding thy (single) ewe to be added to his flock of ewes: truly many are the Partners (in business) who wrong each other: not so do those who believe and work deeds of righteousness, and how few are they?'
And Dawud* gathered that We had tried him: he asked forgiveness of his Lord, fell down, bowing (in prostration) and turned (to Allah in repentance).
So We forgave him this (lapse): he enjoyed, indeed, a Near Approach to Us, and a beautiful Place of (final) return." (TMQ Saad: 21-25)

* Hence – do not jump to conclusions until you hear both sides of the story. Once you make a mistake immediately ask for Allah’s forgiveness. It is important to learn in improve after mistakes.

Case 2:

-----------------------
"And remember Dawud* and Solomon, when they give judgment in the matter of the field into which the sheep of certain people had strayed by night: We did witness their judgment. To Solomon We inspired the (right) understanding of the matter: to each (of them) we gave Judgment and Knowledge."
It was recounted by many narrators that those people had a vineyard, wherein the sheep of the other people had spread, i.e. trespassed on by night and ate up all its plants.
They raised their case to Dawud* and he awarded the owner of the field the sheep themselves in compensation for his damage.
When they went out and met Solomon, he asked them, "what did the Prophet of Allah rule?" They answered, "He ruled so and so."
He said, "Had it been up to me, I would have ordered the sheep to be handed to the owners of the vineyard to benefit from its yield and profit until the owners of the sheep have restored the vineyard of the other people to its previous condition, and then they could have their sheep back."
When Dawud* was informed of this, he approved it.

*Hence – both judged with the facts and made correct decisions but one was closer to justice than the other. It is important not just to have a Just Law (Shariah) but also a Just Judge (with Iman) who applies the Law appropriately. Throughout the many centuries of Islam and the Islamic State Muslims have grown up with the idea of variations in application of the Shariah and this has led to tolerance of different opinions as Islam is not a monolith and Shariah is more than simply the Hudood. There is no territory today that applies Islam even though they may claim to.


Case 3:

-----------------------
The Story of Solomon* with the Horses: Allah says in Surah Saad:
"To Dawud* we gave Solomon (for a son)" and he was a Prophet "how excellent in Our service! Ever did he tum when (to Us)!"
"Behold, there were brought before him, at eventide, horses of the highest breeding, and swift offoot; And he said, 'Truly do I love the love of Good, with a view to the glory of my Lord '-until (the sun) was hidden in the veil (of Night):" (Saad: 32)
Some scholars say that Solomon* was so engrossed in the inspection of his fine horses that he completely forgot to perform his Asr prayer before the sunset (not deliberately).
Upon missing the 'Asr prayer, he said, " 'Bring them back to me.' "Then he fell to slashing (their) legs and their necks with his sword.


Case 4

-----------------------
Prisoners of war constituted a problem awaiting resolution because it was a new phenomenon in the history of Islam after the Battle of Badr. The Prophet* consulted Abu Bakr and ‘Umar bin Al-Khattab as to what he should do with the prisoners.
Abu Bakr suggested that he should ransom them, explaining this by saying: "They are after all our relatives, and this money would give us strength against the disbelievers, moreover, Allâh could guide them to Islam."
‘Umar advised killing them, saying, "They are the leaders of Kufr (disbelief)."
The Prophet* preferred Abu Bakr’s suggestion to that of ‘Umar’s.
The following day, ‘Umar called on the Prophet* and Abu Bakr to see them weeping. He showed extreme astonishment and inquired about the situation so that he might weep if it was worth weeping for, or else he would feign weeping.
The Prophet* said that a Qur’ânic verse had been revealed rebuking them for taking ransom from the captives rather than slaying them: "It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allah desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allah is All- Mighty, All- Wise. Were it not a previous ordainment from Allah, a severe torment would have touched you for what you took." [TMQ 8:67-68]
The previous Divine ordainment went as follows, "Thereafter (is the time) either for generosity (i.e. free them without ransom) or ransom." [TMQ 47:4]
Which included an area providing permission to take ransom, that is why no penalty was imposed.
They were rebuked only for taking prisoners before subduing all the land of disbelief. Apart from this, the polytheists taken to Madinah were not only prisoners of war but rather archcriminals of war whom modern war penal law brings to justice to receive their due sentence of death or prison for life.


Case 5:

-----------------------
Abu Huraira said, that the Messenger of Allah* said, "Two women had their sons with them, and suddenly a wolf passed by snatching one of the two boys.
Thus they fought over the other.
The elder said, 'The wolf took your son', and the younger said, 'No, it took yours.'
They raised their case to Dawud*, who ruled that he was the elder's.
They went out and met Solomon*, who said, 'Bring me a knife and I will cut him into two, for each to take a half.
'The younger thereupon said, 'Do not, may Allah have mercy on you, he is her son.
Thus, he ruled that the child was hers. " [Bukhari, Muslim]

*Hence – the element of surprise from Solomon* allowed him to assess who really loved the child and would rather give him up than have him killed.



Main Topic: What protects us from the Punishment of the Grave?


The good deeds

The Prophet* said, “When the dead person is buried, he is able to hear the footsteps of the people when they are leaving the cemetery. Then his good deeds will surround him.
So Salah would come next to his head; fasting would come on his right side and
Zakah would come on the left side.
The other good deeds would come next to his feet.
So whenever this person would be attacked from the head, the salah would say, ‘No you cannot come from this side.’
And whenever the attack is from the right side, the siyaam [fasting] would say, ‘No, you cannot come from this side.’
The Zakah would say, you cannot come from this side.
And the other good deeds would say, you cannot from the feet.
And they would be making a shield, surrounding this person from every side and protecting this person.”


Seeking refuge in Allah from the punishment of the grave

The Prophet* said, “When you make tashahud, seek refuge in Allah from four things:
- from punishment of the hell fire,
- from the punishment of the grave,
- from the fitna of life and death, and
- from the fitna of ad-dajjal (the false messiah).”

It is a sunnah to say this [Du'aa`] during salah, after tashahud (before salaam).


Who are the ones that are saved from the punishment of the grave?

The Martyrs (shuhada)

The Prophet* said, “There are six qualities for the Martyr (shaheed): he would be forgiven with the first drop of blood that comes from his body; he would see his place in paradise; he would be saved from the punishment of the grave; he would be saved from the fear of the most fearful day; the crown of tranquility will be placed on his head – one emerald in it is worth the world and everything in it; he would be married to 72 hoor al-ayn; he would be given shafa’aa (intercession) for 70 of his relatives.”
One of the companions said, “O RasulAllah, how come the believers go through the trials of the grave, but the shaheed doesn’t?” The Prophet* said, “The shining of the swords over his head is enough of a fitna for him.”


The Frontier Guard (Al muraabit)

They are the soldier who is positioned in a station away from home, guarding the Muslims, waiting for instructions to fight. The word comes from ‘rabat’ – when you tie something. Al muraabit is someone who is tied to that post – they cannot leave. That guard/soldier has to guard day and night. It is a very difficult job. Because of that, Allah gives him a special reward. The Prophet* said, “Everyone’s deeds would be terminated they die, except for the one who dies as a muraabat. Allah would continue his deeds for him, and they would keep growing until the day of judgement, and he would be saved from the punishment of the grave.”


Those who die on Friday

In a hasan hadith, “Any Muslim who dies on Friday, Allah will save him from the punishment of the grave.”

Read Surah Mulk

Imam Ahmad recorded from Abu Hurayrah the Prophet* said, "Verily, there is a chapter in the Qur’an which contains thirty Ayat that will intercede on behalf of its reciter until he is forgiven. (It is): ‘Blessed be He in Whose Hand is the dominion.’" Ibn Abbas narrates that the Prophet* said, “It is a protector; a rescuer; saving from the punishment of the grave.” (At-Tirmidhi and Al-Hakim.)


Deeds that Benefit after death

Abu Hurairah narrated that the Prophet* said, "When a man dies, his good deeds come to an end except three: ongoing charity, beneficial knowledge, and righteous offspring who will pray for him." (Muslim)

Commenting on this hadith, Imam An-Nawawi said, "The scholars said, the meaning of this hadith is that the deeds of the deceased come to an end as soon as he or she dies, and the renewal of reward ceases for him or her, except in these three cases because he or she is the cause of them:
• his or her offspring is counted among his or her earnings,

• the knowledge that he or she leaves behind through teaching or writing,

• ongoing charity, i.e., a waqf (Islamic endowment)."

The narration below adds further details: Abu Hurairah narrated that the Prophet* said, "The good deeds that will reach a believer after his death are:
- knowledge which he learned and then spread;

- a righteous son whom he leaves behind;

- a copy of the Qur'an that he leaves as a legacy;

- a mosque that he built;

- a house that he built for wayfarers;

- a canal that he dug;

- or charity that he gave during his lifetime when he was in good health.

- These deeds will reach him after his death."
(Ibn Majah)


[We also talked about some other etiquettes of visiting the Graves such as saying ‘Salaam’ to the ‘People of the Graveyard’ who will reply back]


May Allah protect us, our families and all of the Muslims from the punishment of the grave. Ameen.

Monday, 3 January 2011

02 January 2011

02 January 2011

Seerah of Muhammed*
*: May the Peace, Blessings & Mercy of Allah be upon him
TMQ: Translation to the nearest meaning of the Qur’an

Challenges after Badr
The battle of Badr was the first armed encounter between the Muslims and Quraish. It was in fact a decisive battle that gained the Muslims a historic victory acknowledged by all the Arabs, and dealt a heavy blow to the religious and economic interests of the polytheists. There were also the Jews who also used to regard each Islamic victory as a heavy blow to their religio-economic entity. Both parties were burning with rage and fury since the Muslims had achieved that great victory:
Verily, you will find the strongest among men in enmity to the believers (Muslims) the Jews and Al-Mushrikun (polytheists, pagans, idolators and disbelievers, etc.).” [5:82]
Both resentful parties were joined in their hatred if Islam by the hypocrites who faked Islam just to save their faces; at the head of whom came ‘Abdullah bin Ubai (more about him later).
The whole cause of Islam was thus at stake with four furious parties laying ambushes against the new religion, each in its style:
- Hypocrites pretending to be Muslims so as to be involved in conspiracy plots and provocative deeds within Madinah
- Jews hating that the Prophet* was an Arab
- Quraish in Mecca bend on revenge
- Other Arabs waiting to take advantage of the new Islamic Sate in Medina
The Muslims were always obliged to be on the lookout for any hostile movements, and it was imperative on them to launch pre-emptive strikes in all directions in order to enjoy a reasonable degree of security in this great instability-provoking ocean of unrest.
As Muslims, we should not be racist or prejudiced against other people based on race, colour or ethnicity. Muslims are not anti-semitic, and infact, the arabs are cousins of the Jewish nation. Muslims should not think of themselves as superior due to their ethnicity or birth but due to their piety. It may not be politically correct to talk about Jews and how the Prophet* dealt with them but these are historical facts and the coming study circles will highlight these. The Prophet* started out treating the Jews of Medina as near-equal citizens of the state but they chose to break that agreement and worked against the Prophet* by word and deed.

Al-Kudr Invasion
Seven days after the event of Badr the Muslims wre on the march again to defend themselves. The scouting body of Madinah reported that Banu Saleem of Ghatafan were engaged in mustering troops to invade the Muslims. The Prophet* took the initiative himself and mounted a surprise attack on them in their own homeland at a watering place called Al-Kudr. Banu Saleem, on receiving the news, had fled before he arrived. He stayed there for three days, took their 500 camels as booty and distributed them to the fighters after he had set aside the usual one-fifth; each one gained two camels. This invasion took place in Shawwal in the year 2 A.H.

As-Sawiq Invasion
Two-pronged hostile activities were being independently conducted against the Prophet*; plots and intrigues being hatched by Safwan bin Omaiyah, the hypocrites and Jews on the one hand, going on and on parallel lines with military hostilities being prepared by Abu Sufyan aiming at saving the face of his people and impressing on the other Arabs that Quraish was still a military power to be counted for. In the aftermath of Badr, Abu Sufyan was burning for revenge and took a solemn vow he would never bathe off impurity unless he had avenged himself on Muhammad* and his followers. He set out at the head of 200 men towards Madinah but was not brave enough to attack it in broad daylight. He, instead resorted to acts of piracy that are performed in the dark. He infiltrated into the Prophet ’s town and went to see an old ally Huyai bin Akhtab, who was too cowardly to let him in, so he left for Salam bin Mashkam, chief of Bani Nadeer, a tribe of Jews. The Jew entertained and gave him a full account of the situation therein. Late at night he despatched a group of his men to raid Al-‘Uraid, a suburb of Madinah. There, the men felled and burnt the palm trees, killed two Muslims and then took swiftly to their heels.
On hearing the news, the Prophet* gathered his men and set out at their heels, but could not catch them. The Muslims brought back the provisions (Sawiq, a kind of barley porridge) which the polytheists had thrown aside in order to lighten their loads and hasten their escape; hence this campaign was called As-Sawiq Invasion. It took place in Dhul-Hijjah 2 A.H., two months after the event of Badr.

Hadith
Number 14 of Nawawi's 40 Hadith: The value of Life
On the authority of Ibn Mas’ud who said The Messenger of Allah* said: "The blood of a man who is a Muslim is not lawful (i.e. cannot be lawfully shed), save if he belongs to one of three (classes): a married man who is an adulterer; life for a life (i.e. for murder); one who is a deserter of his religion, abandoning the community.” [Bukhari & Muslim]

Before the arrival of Islam, human life had no value. A person can easily be killed for many different reasons, e.g. revenge, to show the superiority of a tribe, killing a newborn baby girl because it was considered a shame, etc.
When Islam arrived, it stressed on the value and importance of human life. A life must not be threatened unless it is lawful, i.e. where a serious violation of the shariah had occurred. Islam also made it clear that the taking of a human life is the responsibility of the highest authority, i.e. the judge. This is to prevent this practice from being abused for personal interests.
Islam has established rules and regulations for the community that minimise the need to carry out the execution of a man or woman as allowed by the three cases defined in the hadith. Islam is a peaceful religion and it has established rules where people respect each other and live together peacefully, without lives being threatened.
This hadith should be seen and understood from a positive viewpoint – it is not legal to kill a Muslim except in one of three cases. Because these three cases are exceptional, it shows that the Muslim blood is valued and treasured and is blessed by Allah.
In the last sermon of the Prophet* during his farewell Hajj (which was a few months before he died), he* re-emphasised the principle of this hadith which is the sanctity of a Muslim’s blood. Islam encourages Muslims to avoid any kind of act, e.g. violence, injustice, etc. that will lead to violating this principle. All this shows just how important it is not to shed the blood of a Muslim.
In Islam what is seen as punishment are actually measures put in place to protect the Muslim society and community. Islam takes precautions to ensure that these evil acts (or the violations of these principles) are minimised. In other words, Islam promotes good values and chastity; it encourages marriage, i.e. the legal relationship between man and woman; Islam also discourages acts that might lead to the violations of this principle, e.g. zina (adultery).
The sanctity of a Muslim life is confirmed by the Prophet in this hadlth. The three stated exceptions are those where legal execution is carried out by the state to protect society from the spread of corruption. It may be compared to the surgical removal of a hopelessly diseased limb or organ which, although painful, restores the rest of a body to health. The death penalty, like the lesser prescribed (hadd) punishments, may only be carried out after a conviction completely free of the least doubt. It must further be established that the accused had reached puberty, was in full mental capacity at the time of the crime, and did not act under any form of coercion.

1) Adultery
Marriage is the cornerstone of society and a very important part of Islam. Hence, Islam does its utmost to protect this as society would begin to crumble if marriage is not protected. In the Western countries we see many social problems and some could be attributed to the lack of a strong family structure and systems of support that arise from marriage. Indeed, western society often glorifies adultery (and violence, murder and rebellion against religion) in its TV shows, films, books and how people live.
Hence, modern technology, e.g. the media, Internet, entertainment, etc., is being misused to promote the three negative cases mentioned: adultery, violence/murder, and apostasy. These are shown as being normal and acceptable for the sake of entertainment. The world today has made bad, unacceptable behaviour and negative elements appear as good and vice versa.
In the case of zina, Islam has rules for the Muslim society that regulate relationships. Hence, it is very difficult for the cases mentioned to occur if these rules and regulations are observed. These truly are exceptional cases because during the time of the Prophet* (and later during the era of the Rightly-Guided Caliphs) there were only a few cases where such violations or problems occurred.
Actually implementing the law (stoning to death) is difficult as the criteria for successful prosecution are so strict – which include a confession, or 4 witnesses to the actual act (and not circumstantial evidence).
Execution by stoning for the married adulterer is established in the sunnah beyond any doubt. It was carried out by the Prophet* on a few conspicuous occasions but is admittedly a rare occurrence due to the strict conditions that must be fulfilled. First, the offender must be of legal age, sane, free (not a slave), and bound within a marriage where there is no impediment to normal sexual relations. Then it must be proven conclusively that the person committed the crime of his own free will while knowing that it is unlawful. This necessitates either the testimony of four trustworthy male Muslim witnesses that they actually saw the act taking place at a specific time and location (circumstantial  evidence is not acceptable) or explicit confession by the guilty party, who should be encouraged at the outset to repent privately to Allah and  reform rather than condemn himself to sentence.   A confession later retracted prevents the execution, as does the denial of a person named as the partner of a confessing party. Thus, the harshness of this prescribed penalty serves mainly as a practical deterrent and can rarely be carried out.
Muslim has related the speech of 'Umar bin al-Khattab in which he said: "Allah sent Muhammad with the truth and sent down to him the Book. And included in what Allah sent down to him was the verse of stoning. We recited it, memorized it and understood it. The Messenger of Allah* had people stoned to death, and we have done ii after him. I fear that if time is prolonged for people, someone may say, 'We do not find stoning in the Book of Allah,' and they would go astray by abandoning an obligation revealed by Allah. And stoning is a true obligation in the Book of Allah, the Exalted, for those who commit adultery when married, of men and women."
By putting such a harsh penalty (death) on this it forces people to take the matter seriously.

2) Murder
"A life for a life" means that the life of one who deliberately kills another without right will be taken in turn. Hence, it is not lawful to kill anyone other than the murderer himself, as had been done in the pre-Islamic wars of tribal vengeance. Again, the matter of justice is not left to the victim's family directly but must be referred to the legal authority of the judge and the Islamic State.
The ruling is clearly stated in the Qur'an in verses 178 of Surah al-Baqarah and 45 of Surah al-Ma'idah, where it is shown that this law was also revealed in the Torah and then upheld in Islam. However, Allah has honoured the nation of Prophet Muhammad* by permitting the acceptance of payment (diyah) to the heirs of the victim should choose that option over execution of the murderer.
Some exceptions to the general law of a life for a life have been cited by scholars, such as the father who kills his son, the master who kills his slave, and the Muslim who kills a non-Muslim, although there is no consensus on these matters and differences remain based upon various interpretations of the Qur'anic verses. It is conceded by all, however, that the sex of both the killer and the victim is irrelevant.
Any case in which a judge rules against execution requires payment to the deceased's heirs of the diyah. Besides the possible exceptions mentioned above or the willingness of the heirs to forego the death penalty, it will not be carried out in case of doubt about the killer's intention, even when he has been convicted of the deed by definite proofs. If wilful intent cannot be proved, the diyah must be accepted rather than execution, just as in clear cases of accidental killing. Proper legal measures recognized by all serve to put an end to further bloodshed by those who would otherwise seek revenge through acts of violence, perhaps against innocent persons.

3) Apostasy
The meaning portrayed in this hadlth is that of riddah (reversion) of a sane, mature Muslim from Islam to disbelief of his own free will and his insistence upon it. This must be expressed clearly by him, either by word or deed. Scholars have also stipulated that the Muslim must once have been conscious of the truth of Islam, not unaware or ignorant. To completely dispel any doubt, the apostate is allowed a period during which Islam is presented to him anew with the best methods of da' wah in the hope that he will return to the religion and to the community, thus sparing his life. He is executed by the state government only upon adamant and rebellious persistence in kufr. This differs from the case of a non-believer who has never entered Islam because the apostate, through betrayal from within, poses a greater danger to society. A Muslim does not become an apostate by disobedience or sin; rather, only by denial of divine ordinances or by open claims contrary to the basic tenets of aqeedah.
Some examples are: denial of Allah's oneness; the assertion I hat some human or other beings have something of divinity within them or have divine attributes; denial of the prophethood of Muhammad* or claiming there has been a prophet after him; assertions by a person that he has received revelation from Allah; denial of the Hereafter or anything clearly stated in the Qur'an; ridicule, abuse or denial of any of Allah's prophets, of the Qur'an or of the sunnah and declaration of one's preference for humanly devised systems of government or legislation over the divine shari'ah. A recent convert to Islam would be excused if he made such claims out of ignorance and accepted correction of his views. In addition, anyone forced to save himself by the pronouncement of such statements, his inner faith being unaffected, cannot be regarded as an apostate.
Certain crimes, mentioned in the Qur'an, for which the death penalty may be inflicted (namely, "causing corruption in the land" and "waging war against Allah and His Messenger*), generally coincide with the above.
When Muslims turn away from Islam it is a sad reflection upon the whole Muslim community ans means that we need to have better education and support for each other. In these sorts of situations, it is the Muslims themselves who are responsible for this apostasy because they do not look out for one another.
Many Muslims today are victims of mind-manipulation where misconceptions created by, for example, Western Orientalists and Christians have influenced their perception and attitude. This results in the Muslim being less careful about his Islam, living a double-standard life – looking at him from one angle, he looks like a Muslim but looking at him from another angle, he doesn’t seem to have the Muslim identity.
This leads to another problem which is the lack of the Muslim identity among the Muslims. There are Muslims today who are promoting non-Muslim identities or speaking highly of other cultures which in the Islamic view may have negative elements. We should maintain and promote our own identity. We can still benefit from progress of the West, e.g. technology advancement, but we should do so in a positive way, without jeopardising the image and values of Islam.
We need to discuss these issues which are the real challenges faced by the Muslim community today. We should not just talk about Islamic concepts without putting them in context with reality. We should not just talk about these issues theoretically, simply stating what the rulings on Islam are on this or that matter. We need to have an approach that goes deeper and considers the challenges and strategies we need to put in place in order to help the Muslim community to be positive, confident and proud of their Muslim identity. We need to help them so that they do not become trapped by the challenges they face today.
We need to create awareness among the Muslim community so that they are aware of their roles and responsibilities. We need to see how we can revive the original concepts of Islamic values and behaviour in a way that will work today.

Conclusion
This hadith needs to be looked at in the positive light where the emphasis is on the value of the human life and not on the punishments permissible for the three cases mentioned. Islam has put in place a system which leads to minimising the occurrences of the three cases. There are strategies, obligations, etc., which help the Muslims to avoid these acts.
Opponents of Islam look at the hadith in a negative way where they accuse Islam of being murderous and barbaric. But the truth of the matter is Islam values human life, just as it values chastity (iffah or taharah) - a virtue which has lost its value in these contemporary times because of the evil being promoted by the opponents via the media and negative side of technology. These negative influences have also caused some Muslims to interpret this hadith negatively.
One of the biggest problems today is that with there being more and more challenges, the explanation of the hadith should take into account what the problems are that are facing the Muslims today that violate the principles set up by the hadith. We should look into what we can do to promote the principles and virtues mentioned in the hadith (e.g. to uphold chastity, valuing human life, that killing is a crime, etc.) and to minimise their violations.

News Topic
There was no time to discuss any news topic this week

Homework from 02 January 2011:
1. Read about the People of as-Suffa, who lived in the Prophet's mosque?
2. What do you understand from the next (number 15) of Nawawi's 40 Hadith: Abu Hurairah reported that the Messenger of Allah* said: "Let whosoever believes in Allah and in the Last Day either speak good or be silent. Let whosoever believes in Allah and in the Last Day honour his neighbour. Let whosoever believes in Allah and in the Last Day honour his guest." [Bukhari and Muslim]
3. News Topics from this week: Any interesting news articles from the week that relate to Islam or the Muslims? Bring a clipping or print out if you can...