30 September 2012

Summary
Seerah: Battle of Tabuk Return Journey
The Army of Islam at Tabuk and 'Abd ar-Rahman ibn 'Awf leads the Prophet* in prayer
No-Show from the Romans at Tabuk so The Prophet* consolidates the Islamic State through treaties with the Christian Kings (agreeing to pay JIZYA)
Khalid bin Al-Waleed captures the King ‘Ukaidir who was hunting Bulls
Returning to Medina from Tabuk - Hadhaifa disrupts a plot to kill the Prophet*
The People Who lagged Behind made their excuses to the Prophet*
Destroying the Masjid of Dirar as Abu 'Amir al-Faasiq wanted to have a base to fight against Islam and the mosque provided a good cover for this. Allah revealed their plot.

Belief: The Miraculous Qur’an
Many claimed scientific miracles in the Qur’an
Qur’anic statements about the embryos
Limits of purely scientific interpretations as theory can change, unless established truth
Literary Miracle of the Qur’an (Qur’an’s Challenge)
Only the Qur’an has been able to synthesise these three elements Grammar (syntax), Poetry (Style) and Meaning in a written form


Seerah of Muhammed*
*: May the peace blessings and Mercy of Allah be upon him
TMQ: Translation to the nearest meaning of the Qur’an

The Army of Islam at Tabuk
During the northward march it happened one day at dawn that the Prophet was delayed in making his ablution. The men were in lines for the prayers and they waited for him until they feared that the sun would rise before they had prayed. Then it was agreed that 'Abd ar-Rahman ibn 'Awf should lead them, and they had already prayed one of the two prayer cycles when the Prophet appeared. 'Abd ar-Rahman was about to draw back, but the Prophet motioned him to remain where he was, and he himself joined the congregation. When they had uttered the greeting of Peace which ends the prayer the Prophet rose and prayed the cycle he had missed. When he had finished he said: "Ye have done well, for verily a Prophet doesn’t die until he hath been led in prayer by a pious man of his people."
Arriving at Tabuk and camping there, the Muslim army was ready to face the enemy. There, the Prophet* delivered an eloquent speech that included the most inclusive words. In that speech he urged the Muslims to seek the welfare of this world and the world to come. He warned and cherished them and gave them good tidings. By doing that he cherished those who were broken in spirits, and blocked up the gap of shortage and mess they were suffering from due to lack of supplies, food and other substances.

No-Show from the Romans at Tabuk so The Prophet* consolidates the Islamic State through treaties with the Christian Kings (agreeing to pay JIZYA)
Upon learning of the Muslims’ march, the Byzantines and their allies were so terrified that none of them dared set out to fight. On the contrary they scattered inside their territory. It brought, in itself, a good credit to the Muslim forces. That had gained military reputation in the mid and remote lands of Arabian Peninsula. The great and serious political profits that the Muslim forces had obtained, were far better than the ones they could have acquired if the two armies had been engaged in military confrontation. The Head of Ailah, Yahna bin Rawbah came to the Prophet*, made peace with him and paid him the tribute (Al- Jizya). Both of Jarba’ and Adhruh peoples paid him tribute, as well. So the Prophet* gave each a guarantee letter, similar to Yahna’s, in which he says: "In the Name of Allah, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful. This is a guarantee of protection from Allah and Muhammad the Prophet, the Messenger of Allah, to Yahna bin Rawbah and the people of Ailah; their ships, their caravans on land and sea shall have the custody of Allah and the Prophet Muhammad, he and whosoever are with him of Ash-Sham people and those of the sea. Whosoever contravenes this treaty, his wealth shall not save him; it shall be the fair prize of him that takes it. Now it should not be lawful to hinder the men from any springs which they have been in the habit of frequenting, nor from any journeys they desire to make, whether by sea or by land."
The Prophet* dispatched Khalid bin Al-Waleed at the head of four hundred and fifty horsemen to ‘Ukaidir Dumat Al-Jandal and said to him: "You will see him hunting oryxes." So when Khalid drew near his castle and was as far as an eye-sight range, he saw the oryxes coming out rubbing their horns against the castle gate. As it was a moony night Khalid could see Ukaidir come out to hunt them, so he captured him — though he was surrounded by his men — and brought him back to the Prophet*, who spared his life and made peace with him for the payment of two thousand camels, eight hundred heads of cattle, four hundred armours and four hundred lances. He obliged him to recognize the duty of paying tribute and charged him with collecting it from Dumat, Tabuk, Ailah and Taima’.
The tribes, who used to ally the Byzantines, became quite certain that their dependence on their former masters came to an end. Therefore they turned into being pro-Muslims. The Islamic state had therefore enlarged its borders to an extent that it, touched the Byzantines’ and their agents’ borders. So we see that the Byzantine agents role was over.

Returning to Medina from Tabuk
The Muslim army returned from Tabuk victoriously, undeceived or wronged. That was because Allah had sufficed them the evils of fight. On the way back and at a mountain road, twelve hypocrites sought the Prophet’s life and that was while he was passing along that mountain road with only Ammar holding the rein of his she-camel and Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman driving it, at the time that people had already gone down into the bottom of the valley. The hypocrites seized that opportunity to seek the Prophet’s life. As the Prophet* and his two companions were moving along, they heard thrusts of people coming towards him from behind with their faces veiled. Hudhaifa, who was sent by the Prophet to see what was going on, saw them and stroke their mounts’ faces with a crook in his hand and Allah cast fear into their hearts. They fled away and overtook their people. However, Hudhaifa named them to the Prophet* and informed him of their intentions. So that was why Hudhaifa was called the "confidant" of the Prophet*. About this event Allah, the Exalted says: "And they resolved that (plot to murder Muhammad) which they were unable to carry out." [Al-Qur'an 9:74]
When his headquarters, Medina, began to loom at the horizon, the Prophet [pbuh] said: "This is a cheerful sight. This is Uhud, which is a mountain, we like it and it likes us." When the Medinese learnt of their arrival they set out to meet the army. Women, youths, youngsters and small children went out of town to celebrate their home-return wholeheartedly singing: "The full moon shone down upon us, through the traits of Al-Wada‘ Mountain. Thanks is due to us, as long as a supplicator invokes to Allah.."
The Prophet*’s march to Tabuk was in Rajab and his return in Ramadan. So we see that this Ghazwah took fifty days, twenty days of which were spent in Tabuk and the others on the way to and fro. Tabuk Invasion was the last one made by the Prophet*.

The People Who lagged Behind
Due to its particular circumstances, this invasion was a peculiar severe trial provided by Allah only to try the believers’ Faith and sort them out of others. This is Allah’s permanent Will in such circumstances. In this respect He says: "Allah will not leave the believers in the state in which you are now, until He distinguishes the wicked from the good." [Al-Qur'an 3:179] Lagging and hanging back from full participation in that invasion amounted to the degree of hypocrisy. Whenever the Prophet* was informed of a man’s lingering, he would say: "Leave him alone! If Allah knows him to be good He will enable him to follow you; but if he were not so, Allah would relieve us of him." Nobody stayed behind except those who were either hindered by a serious excuse or the hypocrites who told lies to Allah and His Messenger.
Some of those hypocrites’ lingering was due to an excuse based on forgery and delusion. Some others tarried but didn’t ask for an instant permission. But there were three believers who unjustifiably lingered. They were the ones whom Allah tried their Faith, but later on He turned to them in mercy and accepted their repentance. As soon as the Prophet* had entered Medina, he prayed two Rak‘a then he sat to receive his people. The hypocrites who were over eighty men [Fath Al- Bari 8/119] came and offered various kinds of excuses and started swearing. The Prophet acknowledged their excuses and invoked Allah’s forgiveness for them but he entrusted their inner thoughts and Faith to Allah.

Destroying the Masjid of Dirar
From that time on, hypocrites were no longer treated leniently or even gently by the Muslims. Allah not only bade Muslims to treat them severely but He also forbade them to take their gift charities or perform prayer on their dead, or ask Allah’s forgiveness for them or even visit their tombs. Allah bade the Muslims to demolish the mosque, which they verily appointed and used as a hiding place where they might practise their plots, conspiracy and deceit. Some Qur’anic verses were sent down disclosing them publicly and utterly so that everybody in Medina got to know their reality.
The demolition or burning of Masjid al-Dirar, also referred to as the Mosque of Opposition, the Mosque of Dissent, or the Mosque of Harm is mentioned in the Qur'an. Masjid al-Dirar was a Medinian mosque that was erected close to the Quba' Mosque and which the Prophet* initially approved of but subsequently had destroyed while he was returning from the Battle of Tabuk (which occurred in October 630 AD).
The mosque was built by twelve disaffected men from the Ansar on the commands of Abu `Amir Ar-Rahib (the Monk); a Christian monk who refused Muhammad's invitation to Islam and instead fought along with the Meccan non-Muslims against Islam in the Battle of Uhud.
This man embraced Christianity before Islam and read the Scriptures. During the time of Jahiliyyah, Abu `Amir was known for being a worshipper and being a notable person among Al-Khazraj. When the Prophet* arrived at Al-Medina after the Hijrah, the Muslims gathered around him and the word of Islam was triumphant on the day of Badr, causing Abu `Amir, the cursed one, to choke on his own saliva and announce his enmity to Islam. He fled from Al-Medina to the idolators of Quraysh in Makkah to support them in the war against the Prophet* . The Quraysh united their forces and the bedouins who joined them for the battle of Uhud, during which Allah tested the Muslims, but the good end is always for the pious and righteous people. The rebellious Abu `Amir dug many holes in the ground between the two camps, into one of which the Messenger fell, injuring his face and breaking one of his right lower teeth. He also sustained a head injury. Before the fighting started, Abu `Amir approached his people among the Ansar and tried to convince them to support and agree with him. When they recognized him, they said, "May Allah never burden an eye by seeing you, O Fasiq one, O enemy of Allah!'' They cursed him and he went back declaring, "By Allah! Evil has touched my people after I left.'' The Prophet* called Abu `Amir to Allah and recited the Qur'an to him before his flight to Makkah, but he refused to embrace Islam and rebelled. The Messenger invoked Allah that Abu `Amir die as an outcast in an alien land, and his invocation came true. After the battle of Uhud was finished, Abu `Amir realized that the Messenger's call was still rising and gaining momentum, so he went to Heraclius, the emperor of Rome, asking for his aid against the Prophet . Heraclius gave him promises and Abu `Amir remained with him. He also wrote to several of his people in Al-Medina, who embraced hypocrisy, promising and insinuating to them that he will lead an army to fight the Prophet* to defeat him and his call. He ordered them to establish a stronghold where he could send his emissaries and to serve as an outpost when he joins them later on. These hypocrites built a Masjid next to the Masjid in Quba', and they finished building it before the Messenger went to Tabuk. They went to the Messenger inviting him to pray in their Masjid so that it would be a proof that the Messenger approved of their Masjid. They told him that they built the Masjid for the weak and ill persons on rainy nights. However, Allah prevented His Messenger from praying in that Masjid.
Abu 'Amir urged his men to establish a stronghold and prepare whatever they can of power and weapons as he promised and insinuated to them that he will lead an army, backed by Heraclius, to fight the Prophet* and his companions, and defeat his message by expelling him from Medina. The Prophet* prepared himself to go to the Mosque, before he was prevented by a revelation about the hypocrisy and ill design of the builders of the Mosque. The Prophet* and the companions believed they were Hypocrites (munafiqs) and had ulterior motives for building the Al-Dirar mosque. Thus he ordered his men to burn it down upon their return and Abu 'Amir was given the name Abu 'Amir al-Faasiq. When the Prophet* came back from Tabuk and was approximately one or two days away from Al-Medina, Jibril came down to him with the news about Masjid Ad-Dirar and the disbelief and division between the believers, who were in Masjid Quba' (which was built on piety from the first day), that Masjid Ad-Dirar was meant to achieve. Therefore, the Prophet* sent some people to Masjid Ad-Dirar to bring it down before he reached Al-Medina.


Main Topic: Belief ~ The Miraculous Qur’an

Scientific Miracles of the Quran
Many people have studies the Qur’an and pointed to statements which are written in the Qur’an that modern-day science has verified as being true. They point out (correctly) that an unlettered person living in the desert 1400 years ago could not have known these scientific truths. The main elements mentioned are the verses relating to the formation of the human embryo in the womb, and other scientific statements. Some of these are listed below (taken from a website: http://www.miraclesofthequran.com/scientific_index.html).
The skies with 'woven' orbits
The tsunami effect in the prophet moses’s parting of the sea
The sun will eventually expire
Modern-day radar technology
The contraction motion that facilitates birth
The solidity of the atom and electron orbits
A red rose in the sky: the rosette nebula
Bone loss in old age
The helio-centric system
The ozone layer at the poles as the sun rises
Heart massage
The cloning of living things
The sun will expire after some time
The pulling motion that facilitates birth
The expanding earth
Quasars and the gravitational lens effect
Scientific facts in the story of the flood of nuh
The earth’s gravitational force
Aerodynamic forces and the flight programmed in birds
The miracle of fire and wood, that cannot be obtained artificially
Radio receivers on mountains
The wisdom behind the prohibition of blood in the qur’an
Fossilization and iron content
The mother’s womb with its secure protection
The sun’s hydrogen and helium content
Oxidation in the blood
The quivering and swelling of the earth
The coming of the universe into existence
The expansion of the universe
The end of the universe and the big crunch
Creation from hot smoke
The splitting asunder of "the heavens and the earth"
The creation of what lies between the heavens and the earth
The perfect equilibrium in the universe
The fine tuning in the universe
The structural differences between the sun, the moon and the stars
Orbits and the rotating universe
The sun's trajectory
The moon's orbit
Calculating the lunar year
The force of gravity and orbital movements
The roundness of the earth
The earth's direction of rotation
The earth's geoid shape
The diameters of the earth and space
The layers of the atmosphere
The protected roof
The sky made a dome
The returning sky
The layers of the earth
The earth disgorges its charges
The function of mountains
The movement of mountains
Different points in the rising and setting of the sun
Land loss at the extremities
The splitting earth
The miracle of iron
The formation of petrol
The relativity of time
Creation in six days
The truth of destiny
Duality in creation
Sub-atomic particles
Black holes
Pulsars: pulsating stars
The star sirius
Light and dark
Combustion without fire
The weight of clouds
The proportion of rain
The formation of rain
Rains which bring a dead land back to life
The formation of hail, thunder and lightning
The fecundating winds
The stages of wind formation
How the process of photosynthesis begins in the morning
The seas not mingling with one another
Darkness in the seas and internal waves
The region that controls our movements
Hearts find peace in the remembrance of allah
Forgiveness according to the morals of islam and its benefits on health
How prayer accelerates the treatment of the sick
Stress and depression: the results of not abiding by the religion
The birth of a human being
The creation of human beings from water
Creation from clay
The programming in genes
The menstrual period
Pregnancy and birth
The sequence in development of human organs
The formation of milk
Miraculous mixture: mother's milk
The identity in the fingerprint
The female honey bee
The miracle of honey
The date and its uses as described in the qur'an
The fig: a fruit whose perfection has only recently been revealed
Fish: a valuable source of nutrition
Pork and its harmful effects on health
The olive: a health-giving plant
Coronary by-pass surgery
Health benefits of movement, washing and drinking water
The existence of microscopic life
The existence of animal societies
Biomimetics: drawing inspiration from the design in living things
Locusts moving in swarms
Ant communication
The food cycle
The ears are active during sleep
The importance of movement in sleep
Reduced movement at night
Chest contraction with increasing height

Caution about scientific interpretations
However, a note of caution ~ many statements are vague and open to interpretation. Also, we know that scientific theory can change from age to age and will this invalidate the miraculous nature of the Qur’an? Theories are only theories, and the true miraculous nature of the Qur’an is its use of the Arabic language:

Literary Miracle of the Qur’an
“Read in the Name of your Lord” [TMQ]. These were the first few words of the Qur’an revealed to the Prophet Muhammad* over fourteen hundred years ago. Muhammad, who was known to have been in retreat and meditation in a cave outside Mecca, had received the first few words of a book that would have a tremendous impact on the world of Arabic literature.  Not being known to have composed any piece of poetry and not having any special rhetorical gifts, Muhammad had just received the beginning of a book that would deal with matters of belief, law, politics, ritual, spirituality,  and economics  in an ‘entirely new literary form’. This unique literary form was the cause of the dramatic intellectual revival of desert Arabs, and after thirteen years of the first revelation, it became the only reference for a new state in Medina. This new form of speech, the Qur’an, became the sole source of the new civilisation’s political, philosophical, and spiritual outlook.

The Qur’an’s Challenge
The unique literary form forms the backdrop to the doctrine of I’jaz al-Quran, the inimitability of the Qur’an, which lies at the heart of the Qur’an’s claim to being of divine origin. The Qur’an states, “If you are in doubt of what We have revealed to Our messenger, then produce one chapter like it. Call upon all your helpers, besides Allah, if you are truthful”;  and “Or do they say he fabricated the message? Nay, they have no faith. Let them produce a recital like it, if they speak the truth.”
According Qur’anic experts these verses issue a challenge to produce a chapter (surah) that imitates the Qur’an’s unique literary form. The tools needed to meet this challenge are the finite grammatical rules and the twenty eight letters that make-up the Arabic language; these are independent and objective measures available to all. The fact that it has not been matched since it emerged to this day does not surprise most scholars familiar with the Arabic language and that of the Qur’an.
The inability of any person to produce anything like the Qur’an, due to its unique literary form, is the essence of the Qur’anic miracle. A miracle is defined as “events which lie outside the productive capacity of nature”.  The argument posed by Muslim Theologians and Philosophers is that if, with the finite set of Arabic linguistic tools at humanity’s disposal,  there is no effective challenge; then providing a naturalistic explanation for the Qur’an’s uniqueness is incoherent and  doesn’t explain its inimitability. This is because the natural capacity of the text producer, or author, is able to produce the known literary forms in the Arabic language. The development of an entirely unique literary form is beyond the scope of the productive nature any author, hence a supernatural entity, God, is the only sufficient comprehensive explanation. 

The Arabic Qur’an
The uniqueness of the Qur’an lies in its use of the Arabic language – which was at its peak at the time of revelation – at the time of the Prophet*. The Arabs felt that they had reached the pinnacle of excellence for the language when Allah then sent the Qur’an – which dumbfounded the experts of Arabic language. We can get technical about the miracles (I’jaz) of the Qur’an but to put it in a simplistic way – the Arabic language has three main components: Grammar (syntax), Poetry (Style) and Meaning. These don’t all co-exist at their purest forms as only two can exist whilst sacrificing the third domain. Only the Qur’an has been able to synthesise these three elements Grammar (syntax), Poetry (Style) and Meaning in a written form. The challenge for any doubters is to study Arabic and disprove the rules of Arabic and the Qur’anic approach. It is possible to get more technical about this – but one needs to know Arabic to discuss these technical aspects of the miracle – outside the scope of our Study Circle! We will, however, touch on some aspects of this shortly, I/A.


Children’s Feedback:
Charity Event about the Rohingya Muslims being persecuted in Burma
99 Names of Allah

News Topic
Nil

HomeworkSeerah ~ Read the story (Hadith) of Ka'b ibn Malik and his experience of the Battle of Tabuk. What can you learn from this?
Belief ~ Who could have possibly wrote (authored) the Qur'an at the time of the Prophet?

9 September 2012

Summary:
Seerah: Between Hunain and Tabuk
The Prophet* dispatched a number of smaller armies to consolidate the surrounding tribes and areas, and to demolish the last remnants of idolatry
If the Prophet* leads the army it is known as a Ghazwah, and a Sirayah if lead by the Sahabae
One tribe was fought as they refused to pay the Jizyah
This tribe then had a poetry and speech contest with the Muslims in the mosque precinct
Adi bin Hatim’s sister was captured and released by the Prophet*, who knew more about his religion than Adi
The Prophet* prophesised the conquering of Persia, the immense wealth of the early Muslims and the security provided to the Ummah by the early Khulafah (Caliphs)

Main Topic: Naveed's Belief Pathway
Answering the 3 fundamental questions makes us think and ponder - which if done sincerely leads us to realise that the Creator exists and He created us. Then we look for our purpose in life to define our relationship with the Creator and come across Islam - after realising that the Creator would send us messages on how to live and where to get these answers from. We then study and realise that the Qur'an is the Word of Allah and tells us how to live our life - forming the Actions we do based on the fact that only Allah has the right to make laws for us. These laws are authentically preserved in Islam and by following them, every action being linked to Allah's Word with the right intention, we will please Allah and seek the afterlife which answers the 3 fundamental questions!

Shahnam Charity Event
Well done to the children (supported by their parents) as the money keeps rolling in: the provisional amount raised is OVER £13,000 so far. You can still donate by visiting the charity website: www.shahnam.org




Seerah of Muhammed*
*: May the peace blessings and Mercy of Allah be upon him
TMQ: Translation to the nearest meaning of the Qur’an


Events Between Hunain & Tabuk: Missions and Platoons After The Conquest
Upon returning from this long successful travel, the Prophet* stayed in Medina where he received delegates and dispatched agents and appointed preachers and callers to Islam everywhere. Those whose hearts were still full of prejudice against Islam and therefore were too proud to embrace Allah’s religion, were decisively muffled on their non-acquiescence in the status quo prevalent then in Arabia. Here is a mini-image about the believed ones. We have already stated that the Messenger’s arrival in Medina was by the last days of the eighth year of Al-Hijra. No sooner the crescent of Muharram of the ninth year turned up than the Prophet* dispatched the believed ones, to the tribes as shown in the list below:
1. ‘Uyaina bin Hisn to Bani Tamim.
2. Yazeed bin Husain to Aslam and Ghifar.
3. ‘Abbad bin Bishr Al-Ashhali to Sulaim and Muzainah.
4. Rafi‘ bin Mukaith to Juhainah.
5. ‘Amr bin Al-‘As to Bani Fazarah.
6. Ad-Dahhak bin Sufyan to Bani Kilab.
7. Basheer bin Sufyan to Bani Ka‘b.
8. Ibn Al-Lutabiyah Al-Azdi to Bani Dhubyan.
9. Al-Muhajir bin Abi Omaiyah to Sana‘a’ (Al-Aswad Al-‘Ansi called at him when he was in it).
10. Ziyad bin Labid to Hadramout.
11. ‘Adi bin Hatim to Tai’ and Bani Asad.
12. Malik bin Nuwairah to Bani Hanzalah.
13. Az-Zabraqan bin Badr to Bani Sa‘d (a portion of them).
14. Qais bin ‘Asim to Bani Sa‘d (a portion of them).
15. Al-‘Ala’ bin Al-Hadrami to Al-Bahrain.
16. ‘Ali bin Abi Talib to Najran (to collect Sadaqa & Jizya).
 
Some of these agents were despatched in Muharram, 7 A.H., others were sent later until the tribes they were heading for had completely converted into Islam. Such a move clearly demonstrates the great success that the Islamic Da‘wah (Call) enjoyed after Al-Hudaibiyah Treaty. However, shortly after the conquest of Mecca, people began to embrace Islam in large hosts.
 
The Platoons:
In the same way that the believed ones were dispatched to the tribes, we understand that dispatching some more platoons to all regions of Arabia is a necessity for the prevalence and domination of security on all lands of Arabia. Here is a list of those platoons:
1.     ‘Uyaina bin Hisn Al-Fazari’s platoon in Al-Muharram, the ninth year of Al-Hijra to Bani Tamim. It consisted of fifty horsemen, none of them was an Emigrant or a Helper. This expedition was dispatched due to the fact that Bani Tamim had already urged other tribes not to pay tribute (Al-Jizya) and eventually stopped them from paying it. Therefore, ‘Uyaina bin Hisn set out to fight them. All the way long he marched by night and lurked by day. He went on that way till he overtook them and attacked them in the desert. They fled back for their lives. Eleven men, twenty-one women and thirty boys were captured then. He drove them back to Medina and were housed in Ramlah bint Al-Harith’s residence. Ten of their leaders, who came to the Prophet’s door, called out unto him saying: “O Muhammad come out and face us.” When he went out they held him and started talking. He exchanged talk with them for a while then left them and went to perform the noon prayer.
After prayer he sat in the mosque-patio. They proclaimed a desire to show boasting and self-pride. For this purpose they introduced their orator ‘Utarid bin Hajib who delivered his speech. The Prophet* asked Thabit bin Qais bin Shammas — the Muslim orator — to respond. He did that. In return, they brought forth their poet Az- Zabraqan bin Badr who recited some boastful poetry. Hassan bin Thabit, the poet of Islam, promptly replied back. When talks and poet came to an end, Al-Aqra‘ bin Habis said: “Their orator is more eloquent than ours, and their poet is more poetically learned than ours. Their voices and sayings excel ours, as well.” Eventually they announced their embracing Islam. Consequently, the Prophet* acknowledged their Islamisation, awarded them well, and rendered them back their women and children.
2.     A platoon headed by Qutbah bin ‘Amir to a spot called Khath‘am in Tabalah, a plot of land not far from Turbah. That was in Safar, 9 A.H. Accompanied by twenty men and only ten camels to mount alternatively on, Qutbah raided them and fought so fiercely that a great number of both parties were wounded and some others were killed. The Muslims drove back with them camels, women and sheep to Medina.
3.     The mission of Dahhak bin Sufyan Al-Kilabi to Bani Kilab in Rabi‘ Al-Awwal in the year 9 A.H. This mission was sent to Bani Kilab to call them to embrace Islam. Refusing to embrace Islam, they started to fight against the Muslims, but were defeated and sustained one man killed.
4.     The three hundred men expedition of ‘Alqamah bin Mujazziz Al-Mudlaji to Jeddah shores in Rabi‘ Al-Akhir. This expedition was dispatched to fight against some men from (Al-Habasha) Abyssinia (Ethiopia), who gathered together near the shores of Jeddah and exercised acts of piracy against the Meccans. Therefore he crossed the sea till he got to an island. But as soon as the pirates had learned of Muslims’ arrival, they fled.
5.     The task of the platoon of ‘Ali bin Abi Talib was to demolish Al-Qullus, which was an idol that belonged to Tai’ tribe. That was in Rabi‘ Al-Awwal in the year 9 A.H. ‘Ali was dispatched by the Prophet* with o ne hundred fifty men. A hundred of them were on camels. The other fifty were on horseback. He held a black flag and a white banner. • At dawn they raided Mahallat Hatim, demolished the idol and filled their hands with spoils, camels and sheep booties, whereas ‘Adi fled to Ash-Sham. The sister of ‘Adi bin Hatim was one of the captives. Inside Al-Qullus safe, Muslims found three swords and three armours. On the way they distributed the spoils and put aside the best things to the Prophet*. They did not share the Hatims.
Upon arrival in Medina, the sister of ‘Adi bin Hatim begged the Prophet* to have mercy on her and said: “O Messenger of Allah, my brother is absent and father is dead, and I am too old to render any service. Be beneficent to me so that Allah may be bountiful to you.” He said: “Who is your brother?” She said: “It is ‘Adi bin Hatim.” “Is he not the one who fled from Allah and his Messenger?” Said the Prophet* then went away from her. Next day she reiterated the same thing as the day before and received the same answer. A day later she uttered similar words, this time he made benefaction to her. The man who was beside the Prophet, and whom she thought to be ‘Ali, said to her: “Ask for an animal from him to ride on.” And she was granted her request.
She returned to Ash-Sham where she met her brother and said to him: “The Messenger of Allah* has done me such noble deed that your father would never have done it. Therefore, willy-nilly, frightened or secure, you should go and see him.” Unsecure neither protected by someone, not even recommended by a letter as a means of protection, ‘Adi came and met the Prophet. The Prophet* took him home with him. As soon as he sat before him, the Prophet* thanked Allah and praised him, then said: “What makes you flee? Do you flee lest you should say there is no god but Allah? Do you know any other god but Allah?” “No” he said, then talked for a while. The Prophet went on saying: “Certainly you flee so that you may not hear the statement saying ‘Allah is the Greatest.’ Do you know anyone who is greater than Allah?” “No” he said. “The Jews are those whose portion is wrath, and the Christians are those who have gone astray,” the Prophet retorted. “I am a Muslim and I believe in one God (Allah).” ‘Adi finally proclaimed with a joyous face. The Prophet ordered him a residence with one of the Helpers. From that time he started calling at the Prophet* in the mornings and in the evenings.
On the authority of Ibn Ishaq, when the Prophet* made him sit down in front of him in his house, the Prophet said, “O ‘Adi, were you not cast in disbelief?” “Yes”. ‘Adi said. “Did you not share one quarter of your people’s gains?” “Yes”. Said ‘Adi. The Prophet* said: “It is sinful in your religion to do such a thing, and you should not allow yourself to do it.” “Yes, by Allah, that is true”, said ‘Adi. “Thus I worked out that he was a Prophet inspired by Allah, and sent to people. He knows what is unknown.”
In another version, the Prophet* said: “‘Adi, embrace Islam and you shall be secure.” “But I am a man of religion.” Said ‘Adi. “I know your religion better than you.” Said the Prophet. “Do you know my religion better than me?” ‘Adi asked. The Prophet replied, “Yes”. He said: “Are you not cast in disbelief because you appropriate to yourself the fourth of your people’s gains?” “Yes”. Said ‘Adi. “It is unlawful in your religion to do such a thing.” The Prophet said, and ‘‘Adi added: “He did not need to say it again for I immediately acquiesced it.”
Al-Bukhari narrates that ‘Adi said: While we were with the Prophet*, a man came in and complained to him about poverty. Then another man came in and complained about highway robbery. The Prophet* then said: “O ‘Adi, have you ever been to Al-Hirah? If you were doomed to live long life, you would be able to see a riding camel woman travel from Hirah till it circumambulates Al-Ka‘bah fearing none but Allah; and if you were to live long enough you would open the treasures of Kisra. And if you were to live long you would be able to see man offering a handful of gold or silver to others but none accepts to take it.” At the end of this Hadith ‘Adi later on says: “I have seen a riding camel woman travel from Al-Hirah till it circumambulates the Ka‘bah fearing none but Allah, I have also been one of those who opened the treasures of Kisra bin Hurmuz. If you were to live long life you would witness what the Prophet, Abul Qasim,* had already said about ‘offering a handful of …’ i.e. the Prophet’s prophecies did really come true.”

Main Topic: Naveed's Belief Pathway

We talked through the Belief Pathway (see below). This is to help the children (and their parents) understand the processes that we’ve been going through over the past few months. We talked through the Belief Pathway (see below). This is to help the children (and their parents) understand the processes that we’ve been going through over the past few months. This is to show that we have not been doing things in a random fashion but trying to tie together two strands of fundamental understanding of Islam.  These two strands are linked in the pathway shown below, and these two strands are aspects of belief and aspects of actions (through Shariah and Fiqh).
The Belief Pathway demonstrates how all the fundamental questions and issues that we've been discussing after the Seerah section tie together with how we should live our life and where we get these answers from.
Briefly, we started off by talking about the three fundamental questions that every human being thinks about (why am I here, where did I come from, where am I going).  By answering these fundamental questions human beings will set out their plan for life and how they want to live their life.  These answers don't come automatically but every individual needs to go through a certain process.  Some people are told what to believe and do and they leave it there. If people are sincere in trying to answer these questions for themselves they will necessarily stop to think and ponder about themselves and their reality.  The way the body interacts with the reality is through the senses and this is the surface of our reality.  By thinking and pondering people will necessarily come to the conclusion that they could not come into existence by themselves and needed to be created and that is the next step in the realisation of a Creator.
This rational conclusion would then lead them on to trying to find out their relationship with the Creator (as in the three fundamental relationships for every human being = his relationship with himself, his relationship with others, and his relationship with the Creator).  Every sincere individual would then earnestly search for the purpose of life and exhaust themselves in trying to find this.  Hence they would search out everybody or everything that claims to hold the truth.  It is only right that the Creator tells us how to live by communicating with us - through Messengers & Prophets. Even a superficial analysis of many these answers would allow any individual to discredit them and the answers provided by Islam and its holy book (the Qur'an) would be self evidently correct - or at least worth further study (not a superficial analysis as was undertaken by the recent Channel 4 programme!).
Detailed analysis of the Qur'an would demonstrate that this is indeed a miracle and the inimitable Word of God. We defined a miracle as something which is impossible happening as opposed to a rare event.
Having established that the Qur'an is direct from Allah we now have to accept everything that is in there and follow whatever it tells us to do because this is direct communication from our Creator. Hence we find that Allah defines what we should believe in (Aqeeda) and how we should live our life through our actions.  This is non-negotiable!  These latter sections of belief will be tackled in the coming study circles (InshaAllah).
The second strand of what we have been doing in the study Circle is looking at these actions in greater detail.  These actions which form the basis of our law are derived from Allah through establishing the authenticity of the Qur'an and the Hadith - the system of preservation through the oral tradition.  Hence, we have agreed that sovereignty (the right to make the laws) belongs only to Allah and we get these from the Qur'an, Sunnah (Hadith), Ijma-as-Sahabah (Consensus of Companions) and Qiyas (Divine Analogy).
These are the only sources of law for us to learn how to live our life and we have been trying to dissect some of the terminology involved in this process.  Other important aspects of our actions are the fact that every action we do needs to be based on what we are told to do by Allah - which means every action needs an evidence from Islam (Qur'an & Sunnah) and needs to be done for the right intention (Niyah).  If we do this we will be pleasing our Creator which is the reason we live our life - with the desire to get to a pleasant afterlife (rather than the unpleasant place!). Hence the Belief Pathway brings us back to where we started in trying to answer the three fundamental questions - we now have the answer! This process can also be used to talk to or to discuss with other Muslims and non-Muslims about our belief and why we do what we do. In fact, it should be one major way in which we try and do Dawah to the non-Muslims -- all though not exclusively the only way.
As stated, InshaAllah our fight to go through the remaining parts of the pathway over the coming weeks.


No feedback or News topic

Homework:
- Seerah ~ Why did the Prophet* announce publically who he was going to attack when preparing for the Battle of Tabuk. Normally he* would keep it a secret – come up with some reasons why he* may have done this…
[For the older kids to ponder:]
- Belief ~ Whilst talking about ‘thinking’ and realising the Creator’s existence we talked about the mythical child brought up by wolves or in a jungle – why is this child incapable of proper thought??

02 September 2012

Summary
Shahnam Charity

• We raised over £12,000 following the Shahnam Charity Event

Seerah: Hunain Spoils and Hawazin

• A later leader of Khawarij (Zul Khuwaysirah) accused the Prophet* of being unjust in distributing the Spoils. The Prophet* predicted how he would lead people to and away from Islam.
• Prophet* waited ten days before giving the spoils
• Then the Hawazin returned and became Muslims, but the Prophet* could only give either the wealth or families back. The Tribe chose their families!
• Ka'b ibn Malik was a poet who had criticised the Prophet* and he was afraid for his life as poetry was the main media (way of communicating ideas) of the Prophet's* era.
• The Prophet* accepted Ka'b ibn Malik's Islam and he became one of the chief poets, and earned the Prophet's cloak with his first composition
• Lesser Pilgrimage (Al-‘Umrah) To Mecca And Leaving For Medina after these wars

Critique of Islam: The Untold Story on Channel 4

• Shockingly poor and very bias programme against Islam
• Revisionist 'Historian' trying to falsify the origins of Islam (claiming Islam was sent to a place in Syria not Mecca and the myth around Muhammed* started nearly 70 years later as a tool to justify the growing Arab Empire!)
• The absurdity of rejecting Oral Tradition (Hadith and Qur'an) and claiming no objective evidence about Muhammed* during his lifetime.
• Muslims are confident in their Islam, its origins and Truth. We shouldn't apologise for this!

Shahnam Charity Event

Well done to the children (supported by their parents) who pulled off a fantastic Charity event last Saturday and managed to double the previous total from two years ago. The provisional amount raised is OVER £12,000 so far this year.
Well Done – especially to Noreena!!
You can still donate by visiting the charity website: www.shahnam.org

Seerah of Muhammed*
*: May the peace blessings and Mercy of Allah be upon him
TMQ: Translation to the nearest meaning of the Qur’an

The leader of the Khawarij
A man named Zul Khuwaysirah who belonged to the tribe of Bani Tamim showed so much impudence that he said to the Prophet*: "Today I have studied your activities very minutely and have seen that you have not been just in distributing the booty". The Prophet* was annoyed on hearing his words. Signs of anger appeared on his face and he said: "Woe be to you! If l don't act according to equity and justice who else will do so?" The Second Caliph requested the Prophet* for permission to kill that man but the Prophet* said: "Leave him alone. In future he will be the leader of a group who will quit Islam in the same manner in which an arrow quits a bow".[615] As predicted by the Prophet*, this man became the leader of the Khawarij (apostates) during the Rulership of Ali and undertook the guidance of that dangerous group. However, as it is opposed to the principles of Islam that punishment be awarded before an offence is committed, the Prophet* did not take any action against him.
 
Distribution of Spoils at Jirana - the return of the Hawazin
This was one of the largest booty that the Sahabae ever had. As noted previously, the spoil consisted of six thousand (6,000) captives of women and children, twenty-four thousand (24,000) camels, forty thousand (40,000) sheep and four thousand (4,000) ounces of silver. The Prophet* had waited ten days for the men of the tribe to come to collect their families but they hadn’t arrived. Hence, the Prophet* started giving out the spoils.
Hawazin’s delegation arrived just after the distribution of spoils. They were fourteen men headed by Zuhair bin Sard. The Messenger’s foster uncle was one of them. They asked him to bestow upon them some of the wealth and spoils. He contended that he would release his share (i.e., one-fifth, or one thousand and two women and children) of the captives and would also request other Muslims to release their captives too. It was a voluntary offer; some Muslims readily agreed on this but many refused. When The Prophet* found out that there was a sense of deprivation on this voluntary surrender of their prized possessions, he set an exchange rate that whoever freed a captive would receive six camels. In this way, most of the women and children captives were finally released. Here is a Hadith from Sahih Bukhari on the release of the captives of B. Hawazin:
Narrated Marwan and Al-Miswar bin Makhrama: When the delegates of the tribe of Hawazin came to the Prophet* and they requested him to return their properties and captives. The Prophet* stood up and said to them, "I have other people with me in this matter (as you see) and the most beloved statement to me is the true one; you may choose either the properties or the prisoners as I have delayed their distribution." The Prophet* had waited for them for more than ten days since his arrival from Ta'if. So, when it became evident to them that the Prophet* was not going to return them except one of the two, they said, "We choose our prisoners."
The Prophet* got up amongst the people and glorified and praised Allah as He deserved and said, "Then after, these brethren of yours have come to us with repentance, and I see it logical to return them the captives. So, whoever amongst you likes to do that as a favour, then he can do it, and whoever of you likes to stick to his share till we recompense him from the very first war booty which Allah will give us, then he can do so (i.e. give up the present captives)." The people unanimously said, "We do that (return the captives) willingly." But Al-Aqra‘ bin Habis said, “We will grant none of what belongs to me and to Bani Tamim,”; so did ‘Uyaina bin Hisn, who said: “As for me and Bani Fazarah, I say ‘No’.” Al- ‘Abbas bin Mirdas also refused and said: “No” for Bani Saleem and him. His people, however, said otherwise: “Whatever spoils belong to us we offer to the Prophet*” “You have undermined my position.” Said Al-‘Abbas bin Mirdas spontaneously. Then the Prophet* said: “These people have come to you as Muslims. For this I have already tarried the distribution of the booty. Besides, I have granted them a fair option but they refused to have anything other than their women and children. Therefore he who has some of theirs and will prefer willingly to give them back, let them do. But those who favours to keep what he owns to himself, let them grant them back too, and he will be given as a recompense six times as much from the first booty that Allah may provide us.” People then said, “We will willingly offer them all for the sake of the Prophet*.” The Prophet* said: “But in this way we are not able to find out who is content and who is not. So go back and we will be waiting for your chiefs to convey to us your decisions.” All of them gave back the women and children. The only one who refused to comply with the Messenger’s desire was ‘Uyaina bin Hisn. He refused to let an old woman of theirs go back at first. Later on he let her go back. The Prophet* gave every captive a garment as a gift. The Prophet* said, "We do not know which of you has agreed to it and which have not, so go back and let your leaders forward us your decision." So, all the people then went back and discussed the matter with their leaders who returned and informed the Prophet* that all the people had willingly given their consent to return the captives. This is what has reached us about the captives of Hawazin. Narrated Anas that 'Abbas said to the Prophet*, "I paid for my ransom and Aqil's ransom."

New Chief Poet
The death of 'Abd Allah ibn Rawahah at Mut'ah had deprived the Prophet* not only of one of his valued Companions but also of a valued poet, for he is said to have considered the verses of 'Abd Allah as equal to those of Hassan and of Ka'b ibn Malik. But by general consent there were two Arab poets at that time who outshone all the others. One of these was Labid;' the second was another Ka'b, the son of one of the chief poets of the previous generation, Zuhayr ibn Abi Salma, Although he was a man of Muzaynah, Ka'b had spent most of his life with Ghatafan and had therefore not come under the Islamic influence which was so powerful in his own tribe. His brother Bujayr had entered Islam after Hudaybiyah, but Ka'b vociferously rejected the new religion and wrote satirical verses against the Prophet*, who let it be known that anyone who killed the offender would be doing a service to the cause of God. Bujayr had already -but in vain -urged his brother to go to the Prophet* and ask his forgiveness. "He slayeth not him who cometh unto him in repentance," he had said; and now, after the victory of Mecca, he followed up his previous messages with a poem in which were the lines:Alone unto God, not to 'Uzza nor Lat,
Can be thine escape, if escape thou canst,
On a day when escape there is none, no fleeing from men,
Save for him whose heart is pure in submission to God.
With new multitudinous entries into Islam on all sides, Ka'b felt as if the earth were closing in upon him, and in fear of his life he went to Medina, to the house of a man of Juhaynah, a friend of his, to whom he made his profession of Islam. The next day he joined the congregation in the Mosque for the dawn prayer, after which he went to the Prophet* and put his hand in his, saying: "O Messenger of God, if Ka'b the son of Zuhayr came unto thee in repentance, a Muslim, asking thee to grant him immunity, wouldst thou receive him if I brought him unto thee?" And when the Prophet* answered that he would, Ka'b said: "I, O Messenger of God, am Ka'b the son of Zuhayr." One of the Helpers leapt to his feet and asked to be allowed to cut off his head, but the Prophet* said: "Let him be, for he hath come in repentance, and is no longer as he was." Then Ka'b recited an ode which he had composed for the occasion. It was in the traditional Bedouin style, splendid in diction and highly melodious, with many vivid descriptions of nature; but the gist of it was to beg forgiveness. It ended with a passage in praise of the Prophet* and the Emigrants, which begins:The Messenger a light is source of light;
An Indian blade a drawn sword of God's swords,
Amid Quraysh companions. When they chose
Islam in Mecca's vale men said: "Begone!"
They went, not weaklings, not as men that flee,
Swaying upon their mounts and poorly armed,
But heroes, proud and noble of mien, bright-clad
In mail of David's weave' for the encounter.
When he had finished, the Prophet* drew off his striped Yemeni cloak and threw it over the shoulders of the poet in recognition of his mastery of language.' But he said afterwards to one of his Companions: "Had he but spoken well of the Helpers, for verily they deserve it!" and this was reported to Ka'b, who composed another poem in praise of the Helpers, dwelling on their prowess and bravery in battle, the surety of their protection, and their generosity as hosts.'
 
Lesser Pilgrimage (Al-‘Umrah) To Mecca And Leaving For Medina
Having accomplished the distribution of the spoils at Al-Ji‘ranah he left it while wearing Al-‘Umrah clothes and proceeded to Mecca to perform Al-‘Umrah. The Prophet* turned back from there to Medina after appointing ‘Itab bin Usaid on Mecca as governor. His arrival to Medina was by the last six nights of Dhul-Qa‘dah, in the year 8 A.H. When he* first came to Medina, he was pursued and wanted. He was seeking a secure shelter. He was a lonely stranger who sought companionship and comfort. The people of Medina welcomed him, gave him residence and aided him and embraced the light of Islam, which had been sent down upon him. They, for his sake, did not care about the enmity of other peoples. Here he is entering Medina again, after the lapse of eight years of that first visit. Medina, the town that had received him once, when he was a frightened Emigrant; it receives him once again when Mecca has become in his hands and at his disposal. It is Mecca that has got rid of its pride and Jahiliyah (i.e. pre-Islamic period and traditions). It is now proud again and mighty in Islam. The Prophet* forgave all the errors and wrongs of its people.


Main Topic: Critique of The Untold Story on Channel 4
We spent some time reviewing the, frankly, awful Channel 4 pseudo-documentary that was supposed to analyse the origins of Islam and the stories of the Prophet*. It has been universally agreed that this programme was shoddy, historically inaccurate and deliberately slanted to confuse people about Islam. Some of the main claims were that Islam was sent to a place in Syria not Mecca and the myth around Muhammed* started nearly 70 years later as a tool to justify the growing Arab Empire!
The plan may be to create a sense of doubt in the minds of believers (Muslims) about the veracity and authenticity of Islam so that our belief is weakened and this loosens the love of Islam. It follows on from other ‘pseudo-historical’ pieces of work (written and on TV) that seek to create confusion and undermine Islam. The purpose behind these initiatives appears mischievous rather than trying to genuinely create informed discussion to seek the truth.
We have observed 3 main approaches to criticising Islam in recent years in the Western countries:
1. Genuine mistrust of Islam and Muslims due to the intense negative publicity (and propaganda) against Islam, Muslims and certain traditional / cultural practices of Muslims. This is media lead but the people who are anti-Islam are genuinely ignorant of Islam and it is our duty to re-educate them through positive engagement. This is acceptable for Muslims.
2. Scholarly criticism of Islam using Islamic texts and arguments – known as ‘Orientalism’. A rigorous process of having dialogue about Islam using Muslim references and the idea is to show (from the disbeliever) that Islam is not the Religion of God. This approach has been around for centuries and the arguments are constantly re-packaged but a sensible discussion can occur with these people who have a good understanding of the technical aspects of Islam.
3. Pseudo-Scholarly re-writing of Islam based upon an idea to re-create a version of Islam that is acceptable to Western sensibilities. These people seek to revise core aspects of Islam and can be known as ‘Revisionists’. These are often wild and bizarre theories from people that have a superficial understanding of Islam and want to delete basic beliefs or rules of Islam. They are sometime helped by some Muslims who seek to ‘reinterpret’ Islam for the modern age by applying modern yardsticks to measure Islam or who claim to focus on the ‘original philosophical essence’ of Islam and revise many of the rulings and worships based upon this.
This shockingly bad programme squarely falls into the third category. The Islamic Education and Research Academy (iERA) have produced a detailed and excellent response to the inaccuracies in the programme. We did not cover them in detail but signposted people to them (see handouts) during the Study Circle.
The additional points to reiterate about this programme is the absurdity of rejecting ‘oral tradition’ as a source of information. The propaganda starts in schools with the children’s game of ‘Chinese Whispers’. But Muslims tend to be precious about protecting the sayings of the Prophet* much like we would remember key events in our life. We also highlighted how the scholars of Islam were meticulous in verifying their sources so much that we have a good deal of confidence in the Qur’an and Sahih Hadith (even Hasan Hadith). Infact, the Da’if Hadith are far stronger in authenticity terms than any other Holy Book of the Christians or Jews. The Bible is far less authentic in authorship than anything in Islamic history. Please review the iERA response too.
In conclusion, Muslims are confident in their Islam, its origins and Truth. We shouldn't apologise for this!

Below is the response from iERA:

iERA - A Response to Channel 4's 'Islam: The Untold Story'

29th August 2012. This paper is a response to the Channel 4 Programme "Islam: The Untold Story" which was shown on Tuesday 28th August 2012 and presented by Tom Holland. The paper will address each of the main claims made by Holland.

1. The claim that there is no historical evidence in seventh century on the origins of Islam

Tom Holland's assertion that there is no historical evidence for the seventh century origins of Islam is untrue. This notion cannot be sustained in light of contemporary non-Islamic evidence. For instance, early Christian chronicles in the seventh century elaborate on the origins of Islam, the prophet Muhammad (upon whom be peace) and some of the laws which the Muslims practised. Below are some examples of these chronicles:

Doctrina Jacobi written in 635 CE

A document called Doctrina Jacobi written only two years after the death of the prophet Muhammad (upon whom be peace) clearly mentions that a prophet had appeared amongst the Arabs:

"I, having arrived at Sykamina, stopped by a certain old man well-versed in  scriptures, and I said to him: "What can you tell me about the prophet who has appeared with the Saracens?" [i]

A record of the Arab conquest of Syria written in 637 CE

A record of the Arab conquest of Syria written in 637 CE, just 5 years after the death of the prophet Muhammad (upon whom be peace), clearly mentions him by name. Interestingly, the date of the agrees with the best Arab date for the battle of Yarmuk: "...and in January, they took the word for their lives did the sons of Emesa, and many villages were ruined with killing by the Arabs of Mụhammad and a great number of people were killed and captives were taken from Galilee as  far as Bēth." [ii]

Sebeos, Bishop of the Bagratunis (Writing c.660 CE)

An early seventh century account of Islam comes from Sebeos who was a bishop of the House of Bagratunis. From this chronicle, there are indications that he lived through many of the events he relates. As for Muhammad (upon whom be peace), he had the following to say:

"At that time a certain man from along those same sons of Ismael, whose name was Mahmet [i.e., Mụhammad], a merchant, as if by God's command  appeared to them as a preacher [and] the path of truth. He taught them to recognize the God of Abraham, especially because he was learned and informed in the history of Moses. Now because the command was from on high, at a single order they all came together in unity of religion. Abandoning  their vain cults, they turned to the living God who had appeared to their father   Abraham. So, Mahmet legislated for them: not to eat carrion, not to drink wine, not to speak falsely, and not to engage in fornication. He said: with an oath God promised this land to Abraham and his seed after him forever. And he brought about as he promised during that time while he loved Ismael. But now you are the sons of Abraham and God is accomplishing his promise to Abraham and his seed for you. Love sincerely only the God of Abraham, and go and seize the land which God gave to your father Abraham. No one will be  able to resist you in battle, because God is with you." [iii]

This narrative by Sebeos clearly undermines Holland's assertion that there are no historical records elaborating on the life, teachings and mission of the Prophet Muhammad (upon whom be peace).

2. Unjustified rejection of the Islamic narrative

Tom Holland has presented a clear bias in the programme as he did not use non-Muslim scholars that are supportive of the Islamic narrative. For example, Michael Cook, a historian specialising in early Islamic history explains the implications of early non-Muslim accounts of the origins of Islam:

"What does this material tell us? We may begin with the major points on which it agrees with the Islamic tradition. It precludes any doubts as to whether Muhammad was a real person: he is named in a Syriac source that is likely to date from the time of the conquests, and there is an account of him in a Greek source of the same period. From the 640s we have confirmation that the term muhajir was a central one in the new religion, since its followers are known as  'Magaritai' or 'Mahgraye' in Greek and Syriac respectively. At the same time, a  papyrus of 643 is dated 'year twenty two', creating a strong presumption that something did happen in AD 622. The Armenian chronicler of the 660s attests that Muhammad was a merchant, and confirms the centrality of Abraham in  his preaching. The Abrahamic sanctuary appears in an early source dated (insecurely) to the 670s." [iv]

Holland's rejection of the Islamic narrative lacks academic rigour. Commenting on Holland's approach Peter Webb, who teaches Classical Arabic literature at the University of London, SOAS, explains the "resilient" and "robust" nature of the Islamic tradition:

"Over the past century, the Muslim tradition has been challenged by many academics and it has proven remarkably resilient in its own defence...but the Muslim account of history, the textual integrity of the Koran and the mnemonic capacity of oral traditions are more robust than Holland gives them credit...few scholars today would claim it was entirely fabricated. Holland would have done better to adopt a cautious and sensitive approach to the Arabic sources, rather than abandoning them in favour of a sensational rewriting of history." [v]

Professor Robert Hoyland from the University of Oxford highlights how conclusions similar to Holland's, including the view that Mecca was in a different place, is a result of not studying the Islamic material and developing scenarios not based on evidence:

"..the historical memory of the Muslim community is more robust than some  have claimed. For example, many of the deities, kings and tribes of the pre-Islamic Arabs that are depicted by ninth-century Muslim historians also feature in the epigraphic record, as do many of the rulers and governors of the early Islamic state. This makes it difficult to see how historical scenarios that require for their acceptance a total discontinuity in the historical memory of the Muslim community - such as that Muhammad did not exist, the Quran was not written in Arabic, Mecca was originally in a different place etc. - can really be  justified. Many of these scenarios rely on absence of evidence, but it seems a shame to make such a recourse when there are so many very vocal forms of material evidence still waiting to be studied." [vi]

3. Rejecting Islamic oral tradition

As discussed above, Holland's approach is inherently biased as he unjustifiably rejects the entire corpus of the Islamic tradition, including the oral Prophetic traditions. During the programme a historian of early Islam, Patricia Crone, mentioned that with oral traditions "you remember what you want to remember". With this assertion Holland attempts to undermine the entire science of hadith (Prophetic traditions). The science of the Prophetic traditions is based upon a scrutinising the isnad (chain of narration) and the matn (the text).

Nabia Abbot, a prominent academic who has conducted extensive study on the Prophetic traditions, explains how the growth of these traditions were as a result of parallel and multiple chains of transmission which highlight that these traditions are trustworthy and a valid source of historical information. She writes:

"...the traditions of Muhammad as transmitted by his Companions and their Successors were, as a rule, scrupulously scrutinised at each step of the transmission, and that the so called phenomenal growth of Tradition in the second and third centuries of Islam was not primarily growth of content, so far as the hadith of Muhammad and the hadith of the Companions are concerned, but represents largely the progressive increase in parallel and multiple chains of transmission." [vii]

The academic Harald Motzki has similar sentiments. In an essay that appeared in the Journal of Near Eastern Studies he concludes that the Prophetic traditions are an important and useful type of source concerning the study of early Islam:

"While studying the Musannaf of `Abd al-Razzaq, I came to the conclusion that the theory championed by Goldziher, Schacht and in their footsteps many others - myself included - which in general, reject hadith literature as a historically reliable sources for the first century AH, deprives the historical study of early Islam of an important and a useful type of source." [viii]

4. The absurdity of rejecting oral tradition

Even if we follow Holland's line of enquiry it will lead us to absurdities. The philosophical implications of rejecting the Prophetic traditions are quite damning. In epistemology - which is narrowly defined as the study of knowledge and belief - testimony is considered as one of the sources of knowledge, and when applied properly it can form justified beliefs. Testimony is a valid source of knowledge only when it comes from a reliable source especially if there are multiple sources in agreement. Obviously there are conditions to how we can use testimony, but in the majority of the cases we consider testimony as a valid source of knowledge. For instance, take our certainty on the fact that China exists. Many people have never been to China, eaten Chinese food in China or spoken to someone in China. All they have as evidence is a map of the world and people telling them they have travelled to China and others claiming to be from China but is this sufficient? However, if we examine why we have such a high level of certainty that China exists, regardless of the above questions, we will conclude that it is due to recurrent testimony. Recurrent testimony is when such a large number of people have reported a claim to knowledge (such as the existence of China) that it is impossible for them to agree upon a lie or to simultaneously lie. This is accentuated by the fact that most of these people never met and lived in different places and different times. Therefore to claim they have lied is tantamount is to propose an impossible conspiracy took place.

Linking this to the Prophetic traditions, not only do we have mass testimony of events and statements of the Prophet Muhammad (upon whom be peace), we have a detailed science dedicated to authenticate these traditions. Prophetic traditions have an isnad (chain of narration) and a matn (a text), each of these have detailed criteria that scrutinise the chain and the text to a degree that leaves very little room for doubt. To reject these traditions is tantamount to rejecting facts such as the existence of China or the entirety of history, as these events have been verified via testimony also. Moreover, each prophetic tradition has been scrutinised more rigorously than any historical fact we have with us today.

The criteria used to verify prophetic traditions are summarised below:

Some criteria for the evaluation of Isnad
The unblemished and undisputed character of the narrator was the most important consideration for the acceptance of a prophetic tradition. A branch of the science of hadith ('ilm al-hadith) known as asma' ar-rijal (the biographies of the people) was developed to evaluate the credibility of narrators. The following are a few of the criteria utilized for this purpose:
1.     The name, nickname, title, parentage and occupation of the narrator should be known.
2.     The original narrator should have stated that he heard the hadith directly from the Prophet.
3.     If a narrator referred his hadith to another narrator, the two should have lived in the same period and have had the possibility of meeting each other.
4.     At the time of hearing and transmitting the hadith, the narrator should have been physically and mentally capable of understanding and remembering it.
5.     The narrator should have been known as a pious and virtuous person.
6.     6. The narrator should not have been accused of having lied, given false evidence or committed a crime.
7.     The narrator should not have spoken against other reliable people.
8.     The narrator's religious beliefs and practices should have been known to be correct.
9.     The narrator should not have carried out and practiced peculiar religious beliefs of his own.

Some criteria for the evaluation of Matn
1.     The text should have been stated in plain and simple language as this was the undisputed manner of speech of the prophet Muhammad (upon whom be peace).
2.     A text in non-Arabic or containing indecent language was rejected (for the same reason as above).
3.     A text prescribing heavy punishment for minor sins or exceptionally large reward for small virtues was rejected.
4.     A text which referred to actions that should have been commonly known and practiced by others but were not known and practiced was rejected.
5.     A text contrary to the basic teachings of the Qur'an was rejected.
6.     A text contrary to another established prophetic tradition was rejected.
7.     A text inconsistent with historical facts was rejected.
8.     Extreme care was taken to ensure the text was the original narration of the Prophet and not the sense of what the narrator heard. The meaning of the Prophet tradition was accepted only when the narrator was well known for his piety and integrity of character.
9.     A text by an obscure narrator which was not known during the age of the Prophet's companions or of the subsequent generation was rejected.
It is clear from the above that the criteria for verifying the Prophetic traditions are comprehensive and robust. Even in the philosophy of history we do not find such comprehensive criteria.

5. The textual Islamic tradition

Holland continues to espouse his uninformed perspective by claiming that there is an absence of textual evidence from the Islamic narrative. In response to this there are a myriad of written works in the early period of Islam. Below is a list of some of the early works:

Saheefah Saadiqah: Compiled by Abdullaah Ibn ‘Amr ibn al-Aas during the life of the prophet Muhammad (upon whom be peace). His treatise is composed of about 1000 prophetic traditions and it remained secure and preserved.

Saheefah Saheehah: Compiled by Humaam Ibn Munabbih. He was from the famous students of Abu Hurairah (the eminent companion of the Prophet). He wrote all the prophetic traditions from his teacher. Copies of this manuscript are available from libraries in Berlin and Damascus.

Saheefah Basheer Ibn Naheek: Ibn Naheek was also a student of Abu Hurairah. He gathered and wrote a treatise of Prophetic traditions which he read to Abu Hurairah, before they departed and the former verified it. [ix]

In light of the above the claim that there were no treatises or historical documents in the early seventh century is a false one, and clearly undermines the integrity of the programme.

6. Further baseless assumptions

Holland's unjustified rejection of the oral and textual Islamic tradition forces him to form a coherent alternative. Admitting that he cannot do this, many times describing his source of information as a "black hole", he uses certain Quranic verses in an attempt to justify his revisionist approach to the Islamic narrative. Holland uses the story of the prophet Lot and the so-called non-mention of the city of Mecca as means to justify his alternative theory.

The Story of Lot

Holland argues that the Qur'an eludes to places, landscapes and geography that are not descriptive of Mecca and the immediate surrounding areas. He claims that this implies that the Qur'an originates from a location other than Mecca or southern Arabia. He mentions the following verse of the Qur'an: "And indeed, Lot was among the messengers. [So mention] when We saved  him and his family, all, except his wife among those who remained [with the evildoers]. Then We destroyed the others. And indeed, you pass by them in  the morning. And at night. Then will you not use reason?" [x]

Holland claims that the words "you pass by them in the morning and at night" indicate a place outside of Mecca because the ruins are nowhere to be found in Mecca. With this conclusion Holland makes some bold assumptions. He assumes that Meccans did not travel. This is a blunder as the historian Ira M. Lapidus in his book, "A History of Islamic Societies", clearly states that the Arabs in Mecca were established traders travelling far and wide: "By the mid-sixth century, as heir to Petra and Palmyra, Mecca became one of the important caravan cities of the middle east. The Meccans carried spices, leather, drugs, cloth and slaves which had come from African or the far East to Syria, and returned money, weapons, cereals, and wine to   Arabia." [xi]

If Holland had carefully read the Qur'an, he would have understood that the contexts of these verses was explained elsewhere in the Qur'an as the Qur'an rhetorically asks the Meccans if they had travelled through the land to see the ends of other civilisations and cities: "Have they not travelled through the land and observed how was the end of those before them? They were more numerous than themselves and greater in strength and in impression on the land, but they were not availed by what they used to earn." [xii]

The non-mention of Mecca

Holland claims that the city of Mecca is not mentioned in the Qur'an and therefore justifies his revisionist perspective. This is a complete fabrication. The Quran in the forty-eighth chapter clearly mentions the city of Mecca.

"And it is He who withheld their hands from you and your hands from them within [the area of] Makkah after He caused you to overcome them. And ever is Allah of what you do, Seeing." [xiii]

7. Did the Arab Empire Create Islam?

Although this contention of Holland's does not provide a strong argument against Islam, it is worthwhile pointing out that his view that Islam emerged as a result of the Arab empire does not make sense when the historical events are viewed in a holistic way. The late professor of Islamic studies William Montgomery Watt asserts:

"Islamic ideology alone gave the Arabs that outward – looking attitude which  enabled them to become sufficiently united to defeat the Byzantine and Persian empires. Many of them may have been concerned chiefly with booty for themselves. But men who were merely raiders out for booty could not have held together as the Arabs did. The ideology was no mere epiphenomenon but an essential factor in the historical process." [xiv]

In a similar vein the author Dr. Lex Hixon writes:

"Neither as Christians or Jews, nor simply as intellectually responsible individuals, have members of Western Civilisation been sensitively educated or even accurately informed about Islam…even some persons of goodwill who have gained acquaintance with Islam continue to interpret the reverence for the prophet Muhammad and the global acceptance of his message as an inexplicable survival of the zeal of an ancient desert tribe. This view ignores fourteen centuries of Islamic civilisation, burgeoning with artists, scholars,    statesmen, philanthropists, scientists, chivalrous warriors, philosophers…as well as countless men and women of devotion and wisdom from almost every nation of the planet. The coherent world civilisation called Islam, founded in  the vision of the Qur'an, cannot be regarded as the product of individual and national ambition, supported by historical accident." [xv]

8. What if the Qur'an is God's word?

One of the key reasons of why the Muslim narrative has remained resilient against baseless and uninformed polemics is based on the fact that the Qur'an is from God. The argument is simple yet profound. If it can be shown that the Qur'an is from God, an inflaiible and omnipotent being, then it follows that whatever is in the Qur’an is true. This will include the fact that Islam is a religion sent by God and not the development of an Arab empire, as claimed by Holland.

How can we ascertain that the Qur'an is from the Divine?

The Qur’an, the book of the Muslims, is no ordinary book. It has been described by many who engage with the book as an imposing text, but the way it imposes itself on the reader is not negative, rather it is positive. This is because it seeks to positively engage with your mind and your emotions, and it achieves this by asking profound questions, such as:

“So where are you people going? This is a message for all people; for those who wish to take the straight path.” [xvi]

“Are the disbelievers not aware that the heavens and the earth used to be  joined together and that We ripped them apart, that We made every living thing from water? Will they not believe?” [xvii]

“Have they not thought about their own selves?" [xviii]

However the Qur’an doesn’t stop there, it actually challenges the whole of mankind with regards to its authorship, it boldly states:

“If you have doubts about the revelation we have sent down to Our servant,  then produce a single chapter like it – enlist whatever supporters you have other than God – if you truly think you can. If you cannot do this – and you never will – then beware of the Fire prepared for the disbelievers, whose  fuel is men and stones.” [xix]

This challenge refers to the various wonders in the Qur’an, even within its smallest chapter, that give us good reasons to believe it is from God. Some of these reasons include linguistic and historical.

Linguistic

The Qur’an’s use of the Arabic language has never been achieved before by anyone who has mastered the language past or present. As Forster Fitzgerald Arbuthnot, a notable British Orientalist and translator, states: “…and that though several attempts have been made to produce a work equal to it as far as elegant writing is concerned, none has as yet succeeded.” [xx]

The Qur’an is the most eloquent of all speeches that achieves the peak of excellence, it renders peoples attempts to match its miraculous style as null and void. It is no wonder Professor Bruce Lawrence writes: “As tangible signs Qur’anic verses are expressive of inexhaustible truth, the signify meaning layered within meaning, light upon light, miracle after miracle.” [xxi]

For more information please read the essays "The Qur'an's Challenge: A Literary and Linguistic Miracle" and "The Philosophical Implications on the Uniqueness of the Qur'an".

Historical

There are many historical proofs in the Qur’an that show us it is from God. One on them include that the Qur’an is the only religious text to use different words for the ruler of the Egypt at different times. For instance while addressing the Egyptian ruler at the time of Prophet Yusuf (Joseph), the word "Al-Malik" in Arabic is used which refers to a ruler, king or sultan.

“The King said, 'Bring him to me straight away!'…”[xxii]

In contrast, the ruler of Egypt at the time of the Prophet Musa (Moses) is referred to as "Pharaoh", in Arabic “Firaown”. This particular title began to be employed in the 14th century B.C., during the reign of Amenhotep IV. This is confirmed by the Encyclopaedia Britannica which says that the word "Pharaoh" was a title of respect used from the New Kingdom (beginning with the 18th dynasty; B.C. 1539-1292) until the 22nd dynasty (B.C. 945-730), after which this term of address became the title of the king. So the Qur’an is historically accurate as the Prophet Yusuf lived at least 200 years before that time, and the word “al-Malik” or “King” was used and not the word “Pharaoh”. In light of this, how could have the prophet Muhammad (upon whom be peace) known such a minute historical detail? Especially when all the other religious texts, such as the Bible, did not mention this? Also, since people at the time of revelation did not know this information (due to the Hieroglyphs being a dead language at the time), what does this say about the authorship of the Qur’an?

There are many more reason why Muslims can justify their belief in the Qur'an. We hope this provides the window of opportunity for the reader to study further and engage with a text that not only changed the Arabia, but the entire world. "Seldom, if ever, has a set of ideas had so great an effect on human societies  as Islam has done, above all in the first half of the seventh century. In little more than twenty years, the religious and political configuration of Arabia was changed out of all recognition. Within another twenty all of the rich, highly developed, militarily powerful world enveloping Arabia was conquered, save for Asia Minor and north Africa." [xxiii]

9. Selective Scholarship

Holland's choice of scholarship was very selective and was carefully planned to substantiate his argument. He appeared to have ignored a bulk, in fact the majority, of scholarship to make his point stand out. He relied heavily upon the opinions of Patricia Crone (featured in the documentary), whose theories on the early Islamic history are discarded by most historians today. She has expressed her erroneous views on Islamic sources in a number of works. She went as far as to assert that some of the Islamic sources are ‘"debris of obliterated past"; and some of the early works, including Ibn Ishaq’s Sira (biography of the Prophet), are "mere piles of desperate traditions". [xxiv]

Crone have been heavily criticised by fellow historians for her radical views. Even Fred M. Donner, another historian featured in the documentary, rejected Crone's approach. Referring to people like Crone, Cook and Wansbrough, Donner asserts that:

"...the sceptics have encountered some scepticism about their own approach, because some of their claims seem overstated – or even unfounded. Moreover, their work has to date been almost entirely negative – that is, while they have tried to cast doubt on the received version of ‘what happened’ in early Islamic history by impugning the sources, they have not yet offered a convincing alternative reconstruction of what might have happened." [xxv]

Angelika Neuwirth, a German scholar on the Quran, has expressed similar sentiments on Patricia Crone and her likes. She states:

"As a whole, however, the theories of the so called sceptic or revisionist scholars who, arguing historically, make a radical break with the transmitted picture of Islamic origins, shifting them in both time and place from the seventh to the eighth or ninth century and from the Arabian Peninsula to the Fertile Crescent, have by now been discarded...New findings of Quranic text fragments, moreover, can be adduced to affirm rather than call into question the traditional picture of the Quran as an early fixed text composed of the suras we have...The alternative visions about the genesis of the Quran presented by Wansbrough, Crone and Cook, Luling and Luxenberg  are not only mutually exclusive, but rely on textual observations that are too selective to be compatible with the comprehensive quranic textual evidence that can be drawn only from a systematically microstructural reading." [xxvi]

Carole Hillenbrand has also rejected the extremely negative and selective approach of Patricia Crone and her school. [xxvii]

It is clear from above, mainstream scholarly opinion is that the Islamic historical narrative is far richer and more trustworthy than most historical traditions. Most historians, who have no underlying political or religious agendas, accept the historical validity of Islamic sources.

In summary, Tom Holland has selectively chosen to take a non-substantiated and marginalised view on the origins of Islam. His exclusion of established academic positions and material facts points to the only conclusion of justifying his own prejudices and ignorance of Islam.

Taken From: http://www.iera.org.uk/press_29aug2012.html

---

[i] Doctrina Jacobi  V.16, 209. p. 57
[ii] A. Palmer (with contributions from S. P. Brock and R. G. Hoyland), The Seventh Century In The West-Syrian Chronicles Including Two Seventh-Century Syriac Apocalyptic Texts, 1993, Liverpool University Press: Liverpool (UK), pp. 2-3; Also see R. G. Hoyland, Seeing Islam As Others Saw It: A Survey And Evaluation Of Christian, Jewish And Zoroastrian Writings On Early Islam, 1997, op. cit., pp. 116-117.
[iii] R. W. Thomson (with contributions from J. Howard-Johnson & T. Greenwood), The Armenian History Attributed To Sebeos Part - I: Translation and Notes, 1999, Translated Texts For Historians - Volume 31, Liverpool University Press, pp. 95-96. Other translations can also be seen in P. Crone & M. Cook, Hagarism: The Making Of The Islamic World, 1977, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, pp. 6-7; R. G. Hoyland, Seeing Islam As Others Saw It: A Survey And Evaluation Of Christian, Jewish And Zoroastrian Writings On Early Islam, 1997, op. cit., p. 129; idem., "Sebeos, The Jews And The Rise Of Islam" in R. L. Nettler (Ed.), Medieval And Modern Perspectives On Muslim-Jewish Relations, 1995, Harwood Academic Publishers GmbH in cooperation with the Oxford Centre for Postgraduate Hebrew Studies, p. 89.
[iv] Michael Cook. Muhammad, Past Masters Oxford University Press, Page 74. First published 1983 as an Oxford University Press paperback. Reissued 1996
[v] http://www.standard.co.uk/arts/book/islams-real-origins-7640194.html
[vi] Robert Hoyland, New Documentary Texts and the Early Islamic State, 2006
[vii] N. Abbott, Studies In Arabic Literary Papyri, Volume II (Qur'anic Commentary & Tradition), 1967, The University Of Chicago Press, p. 2.
[viii] H. Motzki, "The Musannaf Of `Abd al-Razzaq Al-San`ani As A Source of Authentic Ahadith of The First Century A.H.", Journal Of Near Eastern Studies, 1991, Volume 50, p. 21.
[ix] M. M. Azami. Studies in Early Hadith Literature. 2001. American Trust Publications.
[x] Qur'an 47: 133 - 138
[xi] Page 14.
[xii] Qur'an 40: 82
[xiii] Qur'an 48: 24
[xiv] William Montgomery Watt, ‘Economic and Social Aspects of the Origin of Islam’ in Islamic Quarterly 1 (1954), p. 102-3.
[xv] Lex Hixon. The Heart of the Qur'an: An Introduction to Islamic Spirituality. Quest Books. 2003, page 3.
[xvi] Qur'an 81: 26 – 28
[xvii] Qur'an 21: 30
[xviii] Qur'an 30: 8
[xix] Qur'an 2: 23
[xx] F. F. Arbuthnot. 1885. The Construction of the Bible and the Koran. London, p 5.
[xxi] Bruce Lawrence. The Qur’an: A Biography. Atlantic Books, p 8.
[xxii] Qur'an 12: 50
[xxiii] Johnston, Witnesses to a World Crises (Oxford, 2010), p. 357-8.
[xxiv] Patricia Crone, Slaves on Horses (Cambridge, 2003), p. 10.
[xxv] Fred M. Donner, Modern Approaches to Early Islamic History, New Cambridge History of Islam v. 1, 2010, p. 633.
[xxvi] Angelika Neuwirth, Structural, Linguistic and Literary Features, the Cambridge Companion to the Quran, 2006, p. 100-1.
[xxvii] See Carole Hillenbrand. Muhammad and the Rise of Islam. New Cambridge Medieval History.

Children’s Feedback:
The Tent on the Mountain and Proof of Allah

No Homework or News Topic

Reading Fatihah for recently deceased Relative