Showing posts with label Yusha bin Nun. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Yusha bin Nun. Show all posts

Monday, 2 February 2015

1 February 2015 ~ Talut's Army and Inside the Grave

1 February 2015 ~ Talut's Army and Inside the Grave



Prophet Yusha* to other Prophets
Prophet Yusha* captured Jerusalem for Bani Israel and they lived there in peace and prosperity for some time. After many years they lost their way, became arrogant and disobedient to Allah. This resulted in them losing battles and losing their precious Ark of the Covenant – which contained items from Prophet Musa* and Harun*. They were then further humiliated by being defeated and thrown out of their cities. It is at this time that they approached their Prophet (not named in the Qur’an) but thought to be Samuel (Shaamil) to ask for a king to help them fight and retain their cities.
Before that story, there are two other Prophets briefly mentioned by name in Ibn Kathir’s Lives of the Prophets as being sent to Bani Israel. There were many others sent but not mentioned but Allah highlights these with no additional commentary:

Prophet Ilyas* (thought to be Elijah from the Bible):
The Quran mentions about Prophet Ilyas* along with some of the other great Prophets, who were the descendants of Abraham*: “And Zacharias and John, Jesus and Elias (all were upright men).” [TMQ 6:85]
And lo! Elias was of those sent (to warn), When he said unto his folk: Will ye not ward off (evil)? Will ye cry unto Baal and forsake the best of creators, Allah, your Lord and Lord of your forefathers? But they denied him, so they surely will be haled forth (to the doom) Save single-minded slaves of Allah. And we left for him among the later folk (the salutation): Peace be unto Elias! Lo! thus do We reward the good. Lo! he is one of our believing slaves. And lo! Lot verily was of those sent (to warn). When We saved him and his household, every one, Save an old woman among those who stayed behind; Then We destroyed the others. And lo! ye verily pass by (the ruin of) them in the morning. And at night-time; have ye then no sense?” [TMQ 37:123-138]

Prophet Al-Yasa* (thought to be Elisha from the Bible)
And Ishmael and Elisha and Jonah and Lot. Each one of them did We prefer above (Our) creatures,  With some of their forefathers and their offspring and their brethren; and We chose them and guided them unto a straight path.” [TMQ 6:86-7]
And make mention of Ishmael and Elisha and Dhu'l-Kifl. All are of the chosen.” [TMQ 38:48]


King Talut is chosen

Ibn Jarir reported that the condition of Bani Israel deteriorated. They committed many sins and killed whom they wished of the prophets. Consequently Allah sent them tyrannous king who ill-treated them and spilled their blood, and set their enemies from outside against them as well. They used to go war, taking with them The Ark of the Covenant. They did this so that they would be victorious by its blessings, and it became a symbol of calm and a relic left behind by Moses's people. When they went to war with the people of Gaza and Askalon, they were defeated because the Ark of the Covenant was captured from them. When the king of Bani Israel heard of this he died on the spot. Bani Israel remained lost until Almighty Allah sent them a prophet ( thought to be Samuel/Shammil* - although not named in the Qur’an). They asked him to appoint a king over them to lead in a war against their enemies.

Prophet Samuel*, knowing their weakness, told them: "I fear that when the time comes to fight you may refuse." But they assured him that they had suffered enough insults and were now ready to fight in the way of Allah, even if they lost their lives. Prophet Samuel prayed to Allah for guidance. Allah revealed to him that He had chosen one, Talut (Saul), to be their king. The prophet wanted to know how to recognize the future king. He was told that Talut would come to him by himself and that they should then hand over the control of kingdom to him, for he would lead them in battle against the Philistines.


He then told Talut that Allah had chosen him as the king of the children of Israel. His duty would be to take charge of their affairs, to unite them under one banner, and to protect them from their enemies. If he carried out Allah's commands, he would be given victory. Talut was surprised by this sudden honour offered to him. It was also a heavy responsibility. He protested to the prophet that he was a of the children of Benjamin, the least famous of the tribes of Jacob; he did not know anything of leadership or kingship and had no wealth. Samuel told him that it was the will of Allah that he should be the king, that he should thank Allah for His favour and be strong in faith.

Taking Talut by the hand, Samuel* led him to the children of Israel, but they insisted on a direct sign from Allah. Prophet Samuel* told them to go outside the city to see the sign, which they did.


When Prophet Samuel* presented Talut to Bani Israel, they were very upset because of his tribe called Benjamin, who they considered unworthy of such greatness. After long arguments they finally demanded that if the long lost chest with Prophet Musa* and Prophet Harun* belongings was restored to them, they would accept Talut as their king. God restored the chest to them and though they were overjoyed and very happy to recover the chest, they had no other choices but to accept Talut as their king.


After becoming a king Talut very carefully established an army, but on their way to fight Philistine he put them through vigorous trainings and gave them strict criteria. So, by the time they came to face the tyrant king of Philistine named Goliath king Talut ended up with an army of about 310 out of 80,000. But he was happy with these truly qualified fighters. With this small army when he faced king Goliath, who was a very big and gigantic person and no one in king Talut’s army wanted to fight him in a single combat offered by Goliath.


Talut set about organizing his army with strong faith and wisdom. He ordered that only men free from responsibilities should join. Those engaged in building homes, men who were about to be married and those occupied with business should not join. After establishing a well-trained army, he decided to put them to the test. He told them that along the route they would pass a river where they should drink enough water to quench their thirst but not more than that. To his disappointment, he discovered the majority of them drank more water than they should have. He discharged them for disobedience and kept only the few who had obeyed him, as they were the ones who proved their sincerity. This resulted in a split in the army, but he was not bothered. He believed in quality and not numbers; better a small band of true believers he could rely on than a huge army of unreliable men.


Talut's men sighted the enemy on the other side of the river. Their opponents appeared physically strong and were armed with better weapons. They were led by the mighty warrior Goliath (Jalut), known for his huge build and brute strength. A great number of Talut's men ran away on seeing this strong force. The small band that remained was willing to fight, whatever the outcome, for they had heard that there had been many incidents in the past in which Allah had caused a small force to defeat a larger one.


"Have you not thought about the group of children of Israel after (the time of ) Moses? When they said to a Prophet of theirs: "Appoint for us a king and we will fight in Allah's Way."
He said: "Would you then refrain from fighting, if fighting was prescribed for you?"
They said: "Why should we not fight in Allah's Way while we have been driven out of our homes and our children (families have been taken as captives)?"
But when fighting was ordered for them, they turned away, all except a few of them. And Allah is All-Aware of the Zalimeen (polytheists, and wrongdoers).
And their Prophet (Samuel) said to them: "Indeed Allah has appointed Talut as a king over you."
They said: "How can he be a king over us when we are better fitted than him for the kingdom, and he has not been given enough wealth."
He said: "Verily, Allah has chosen him above you and has increased him abundantly in knowledge and stature. And Allah grants His Kingdom to whom He wills. And Allah is All-Sufficient for His creatures' needs, All-Knower."
And their Prophet (Samuel) said to them: "Verily! The sigh of His kingdom is that there shall come to you At Tabut (a wooden box), wherein is Sakinah (peace and reassurance) from your Lord and a remnant of that which Moses and Aaron left behind, carried by the angels. Verily, in this is a sigh for you if you are indeed believers."
Then when Talut set out with the army, he said: "Verily! Allah will try you by a river. So whoever drinks thereof, he is not of me, and whoever tastes it not, he is of me, except him who takes thereof in the hollow of his hand."
Yet, they drank thereof, all, except a few of them. So when he had crossed it (the river), he and those who believed with him, they said: "We have no power on this day against Goliath and his hosts."
But those who knew with certainty that they were to meet their Lord, said: "How often a small group overcame a mighty host by Allah's Leave?" And Allah is with the patient.
And when they advanced to meet Goliath and his forces, they invoked. "Our Lord! Pour forth on us patience and make us victorious over the disbelieving people." [TMQ 2:246-250]



Main Topic ~ Fitna al-Qabr (Trials in the Grave)


The Prophet* told us that two angels will descend on the person that is in the grave – called Munkar and Nakir. They would scream at him and they would shock that person and surprise him. Their way of conversation is not very polite. They are very tough and strong. They expect a straight and immediate answer from you. Whether you are a believer or not, they will come in that fashion. These two angels will come down and ask three questions:


- “Ma rabbuk? Wa ma deenuk? Wa man nabiyuk?”

- Who is your Lord? What is your religion? And who is your Prophet?
Our response from the soul will be dependent upon how we have lived our life and whether every part of our body/soul/consciousness would testify to that truth. It is not something we can blag!

The Muslim
The believer would say, “My Lord is Allah. And my religion is Islam. And my Prophet is Muhammad*.” They would hear a sound coming from above, “Qad saddaqa ‘abdi” = “My servant is saying the truth. So furnish his grave from paradise, and provide him clothes from paradise and open for him a gate to paradise.”
So Allah is verifying the answer. This grave on earth is hooked up to Jannah via a different dimension - directly connected to paradise. This person in the grave is able to see his place in Jannah. He is not able to go there, but he can see it. Then a very handsome person will walk into the grave. The dead person would say, “Who are you?” That person would say, “I am your good deeds and I came to spend time with you until the day of judgement.” So the believer would not be alone. The Prophet* says that the believer will have window showing paradise, and a window showing hell. And he will be told, “This is where you could have been if you were not a believer. And this is what you have got because of your imaan.” When he sees that, he would say:  “O Allah, start the day of judgement so that I can go to my family and my wealth!”

The non-Believer
When the angels ask the non-believer: “Who is your prophet?” He would say, “Huh? What? I don’t know. I heard the people say this and I said it.” The angels would smash him with a hammer that would turn him into dust. That person is saying what he heard the people say about the Prophet* – what Abu Jahl said, what newspapers wrote, etc. This is not the answer the angels are looking for. It needs to be clear that belief in Muhammad* is what you will be asked about in the grave. It is not sufficient to say that there is one God. You have to believe in God’s representatives, His Messengers – Muhammad*, Isa*, Musa*, Ibrahim*. They are the ones conveying the Message of Allah to the people of the earth.
After the corrupt, or evil person, is questioned, an announcement will be made from the heavens, “He is a liar! Furnish his grave from hellfire, give him clothes from hell fire and open for him a gate to hell fire.” Then an evil, ugly person will come to him in the grave. The person will ask, “Who are you?” The person will say, “I am your evil deeds and I will be with you until the day of judgement.” That man will have stinking, rotten smell. Two windows will be opened – a window to Jannah and a window to hell fire. He will be told, “This is where you could have been if you were a believer. This is where you will be in hellfire.” He will say: O Lord, do not let the day of judgement start.”
Not only is he suffering physically, but he’s suffering psychologically because of regret.

The Final Trials
Al-Bukhari narrates that Asma bint Abi Bakr narrated that The Prophet* stood in the masjid and gave a Khutbah. He started talking about the fitna of the grave until there was an uproar in the masjid – loud noises. What was that noise? The Sahabah were crying. Asma said, “I couldn’t hear the Khutbah. And I waited until the noise calmed down and then I asked a man next to me, ‘BarakAllahu feek. What was the last thing The Prophet* said?’ The Prophet* said, ‘It has been revealed to me that you will go through fitna in the grave similar to the fitna of ad-dajjaal.’”
The Prophet* said that this is the last test the believer will go through, the last ibtilaa.
 


Tuesday, 13 January 2015

11 January 2015 Prophet Yusha and Charlie Hebdo / Freedom of Speech

11 January 2015 Prophet Yusha and Charlie Hebdo / Freedom of Speech




Lives of the Prophets: Prophet Yusha (Joshua)

When Musa* passed away, the leadership of Bani Isra'il passed to Yusha ibn Nun.  Yusha ibn Nun is not mentioned directly in the Qur'an but he is the servant of Musa* who is referred to in the following verse of the Qur'an: "AND LO! [In the course of his wanderings,] Moses said to his servant (fata), 'I shall not give up until I reach the junction of the two seas, even if I [have to] spend untold years [in my quest]!'"[TMQ 18:60]
Being a servant of Musa* he was close to the Revelation, close to the teacher (Musa) and he was a righteous student of this teacher.  And so, when Musa* passed away, the leadership of Bani Isra'il was passed down to Yusha ibn Nun, and he became their Prophet.
Under the leadership of Yusha ibn Nun, Bani Isra'il is made victorious and returns to the Holy Land, an event which did not occur under Musa* or Harun* (who both passed away whilst Bani Isra'il was still in the wilderness). The Prophet* gives us a clue as to why this victory was delayed when he said: "None of the ones who worshipped the calf entered into Jerusalem.”
The Children of Isra'il who came out of Egypt were raised up in slavery and servitude so they were weak and were not fit for victory.  Allah made them stay in the wilderness for 40 years until all of that generation had passed away.  And they were replaced by a new generation raised in freedom and taught the guidance of the Taurah by Musa* and Harun*, and it was this generation that was given the victory.

Musa* is undoubtedly the greatest Prophet that was sent to Bani Isra'il and he strived eagerly to have this victory, yet we see that victory was not at his hands but rather at Yusha's.  What do we learn from this? That it is not enough to have an excellent leader alone – applying this to our times, it is not enough for us simply to wait for Al-Mahdi but rather we need to ensure we are a generation capable of victory and to be led to that victory by an excellent leader (be that Al-Mahdi or someone else).
And through the example of Yusha we see how Allah grants victory to those who have prepared for it.  Yusha ibn Nun led the Children of Isra'il against the Jababirah (the inhabitants of Jerusalem), who were a large giant-like people.  The fighting was furious and the sun was about to set. Yusha ibn Nun knew that he could not defeat these people except if the day was longer as, if night came, the Jababirah would be able to regroup. So Yusha pointed to the sun and said, "You are receiving orders and I am receiving orders from Allah, O Allah stop the sun!"  Allah, subhanahu wa ta'ala, caused the sun to stop for Yusha ibn Nun until he defeated the people of Jerusalem.  If you have Allah on your side, don't worry!  It's not a matter of numbers, or weapons, or artillery when Allah is on your side.

The full story of Yusha ibn Nun is told to us in a sahih hadith of the Prophet* recorded in Sahih Muslim.  The Prophet* said: "One of the Prophets made a holy war. He said to his followers: One who has married a woman and wants to consummate to his marriage but has not yet done so; another who has built a house but has not yet erected its roof; and another who has bought goats and pregnant she-camels and is waiting for their offspring-will not accompany me … "
This Prophet did not want any person to come with him whose heart may be attached to anything else.  This is a Prophet who is not looking for numbers but rather for ikhlas (sincerity).
The Prophet* continued: " ... So he marched on and approached a village at or about the time of the Asr prayers. He said to the sun: You are receiving orders and I am receiving orders from Allah, O Allah stop the sun! It was stopped for him until Allah granted him victory."
We know this Prophet was Yusha ibn Nun because of a separate narration recorded by Imam Ahmad in which the Prophet, sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam, said: "The sun has never stopped for any man besides Yusha when he wanted to conquer Bayt al-Muqaddis."





Main Topic: Freedom of Speech and the Charlie Hebdo Attacks

Salaam all
Please find below brief notes from Study Circle (a greater, more detailed explanation was given during the Circle). In addition, we had many many questions from the children about the attacks in Paris that were addressed.
These are the main points of the discussion are articulated.
I will also append a few articles that also discuss some of these points.
Jzk
Naveed


Paris Attacks: Islam is against Terrorism
We have to start off by stating that there is no justification from Islam for the Paris / Charlie Hebdo attacks. Islam condemns these actions and no reasonable Muslim would support the actions of the gunmen involved in the Charlie Hebdo or supermarket killings. There is no excuse for this terrorism.
Some people may try to justify this by misapplying certain rules from Islam but vigilante attacks are not allowed, terrorism is not allowed and targeting innocent civilians is not allowed. Some may point to the Prophet* having a blacklist of people for execution when he opened Mecca who were excluded from the general amnesty – and these people were to be killed on sight for their prolonged defamation/insults of the Prophet* and open disbelief. However, these were the orders of the Head of State of a proper Islamic Government and not an excuse for people to take the law into their own hands. Only the Prophet* had the ability to enact the law or forgive.

Islam is bigger than any insult
Also, it is important to restate that Islam is bigger than any cartoon, book, YouTube video or film. Allah will protect Islam and Islam will survive this crisis. One of the best ways to defend Islam is by our example and living the life as the Prophet* would want us. We should obey the Shariah, interact with the non-Muslims through dialogue and invite them to (study) Islam.

Tolerance
History has proven that Islam is the most tolerant of all ways of life / religions when for centuries Muslims would live peacefully with people of all other faiths without persecution. We find the opposite today where the liberal secular West will only tolerate Muslims if we abandon Islam and become secular. They talk about tolerance but do not know what it truly means.




Allah mentions this in the Qur’an when He says: “And the Jews will not be pleased with thee, nor will the Christians, till thou follow their creed. Say: Lo! the guidance of Allah (Himself) is Guidance. And if thou shouldst follow their desires after the knowledge which hath come unto thee, then wouldst thou have from Allah no protecting friend nor helper.” [TMQ: 2:120]




Just because they say over and over again that they are tolerant does not make them tolerant: because they keep telling us what we can and can’t believe. They keep trying to define us into ‘moderate’ (agree with them) and ‘extremist’ (disagree with them) ! Hence, they only tolerate those who are themselves – this is not tolerance. Islam has always historically been more tolerant than other beliefs.

Saying Sorry
Islam and Muslims have condemned the Paris attacks. However, there is no need for us to collectively apologise for the actions of these criminals – as they are criminals and act in opposition to the laws of Allah.

Becoming a political hammer to beat others
However, this whole issue has been blown out of all proportion and become deliberately politicised in order to attack and weaken the Muslims community and alienate us even further. It has moved from an issue of criminal behaviour to a Political Issue to stoke up further Islamophobia and to criticise Muslims and Islam yet further. The speeches, the rally, the increased print circulation of the magazine, the leaders jumping on the bandwagon…all to turn the screw tighter on the Muslim community: physically and emotionally.

The response
The politicians have painted this in to a binary issue: either you support the magazine (Freedom of Speech) or you are supporting the terrorists (gunmen) - much like Bush did after 9/11. But this is a false choice as there are alternatives. We should, unfortunately, expect more of this in the run up to the May General Election in the UK.

The French Angle
A recent article by Robert Fisk and others highlighted that these events do not occur in a vacuum and the context of these attackers needs to be born in mind – being from Algeria / North Africa. France has a long tradition of demonising Muslims and being very racist towards the Muslims of North Africa and is still actively engaged in wars against the Muslims in Syria, Libya, Mali. Recent ‘Race Riots’ in Paris and other cities highlights the endemic racism / discrimination towards the Muslims of North Africa, not to mention the targeted laws against Muslims in France around the banning of the Niqab and girls with a headscarf cannot go to school or hospital!
There is also the brutal history of French colonialism in North Africa, their vicious support of dictators and the inhumane response to the Algerian Civil War – where even the CIA and Americans studied the French manuals of torture after 9/11! All these with high unemployment rates and systemic discrimination will inevitably have one reaction or another. Also, how they reacted post-independence when they were leaving the countries.

The European context
This brouhaha over Freedom of Speech traces back through modern European history and the struggle between the oppressive Church / Papal rule and the Free Thinkers post-Renaissance. The alternative to the corrupt Church rule gave rise to a new system of Man-made laws based upon a consolidated ‘Four Freedoms’:
- Freedom of Belief
- Freedom of ownership
- Personal Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
Freedom of Speech was sanctified early on because it helped society account governments, their rulers and helped push forward science and technology through challenge and the scientific method, and the ability to criticise the crazy beliefs in organised Christian religion. It served a purpose.
Now Freedom of Speech is used almost exclusively to demonise Muslims and the beliefs of Islam and the laws of Islam. The same approach is lost when accounting their own governments, their own Foreign Policy and double standards and the power dynamic of Freedom of Speech has shifted to criticise and silence the marginalised in society. It is used to criticise Muslims but not other groups! What about Edward Snowden and Julian Assange's right of 'freedom of speech', it is very obvious that freedom of speech doesn't exist anywhere in the world if it doesn't suit the ruling paradigm or ideology (western governments).

Hypocrisy of French Freedom of Speech
This is highlighted more acutely in recent years when we see how France has selectively applied Freedom of Speech:
1. A French court injunction banned a Jesus based clothing advert mimicking the 'Last Supper'. The display was ruled "a gratuitous and aggressive act of intrusion on people's innermost beliefs", by the French judge. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4337031.stm
2. In 2005 'Aides Haute-Garonne' organized an informative evening about the prevention of the HIV-AIDS. The prospectus contained a head-and-shoulders image of a woman wearing a nun's bonnet and two pink condoms. On the grounds that the prospectus insulted a religious, a court convicted Aides Haute-Garonne.
3. In 1994 Le quotidien de Paris published the article L'obscurité de l'erreur by journalist, sociologist, and historian Paul Giniewski. The article criticizes the Pope, and states that Catholic doctrine abetted the conception and the realization of Auschwitz. A court upheld proceedings on the ground that the article was an insult to a group because of its religion, and convicted the newspaper.
4. 'Charlie Hebdo Magazine'  itself censored, apologised and then fired long-time cartoonist Siné for a caricature insulting the son of former president Nicholas Sarkozy and his wife Jessica Sebaoun-Darty, while staunchly standing on their 'right' to repeatedly troll Muslims, minorities & immigrants e.g. by showing Muhammad naked and bending over—which tells you something about the brand of satire they practice and that they’d rather be aiming downward towards minorities than upward. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/01/09/trolls-and-martyrdom-je-ne-suis-pas-charlie.html
5. Dieudonné M'Bala M'Bala - a French comedian and satirist - was convicted and fined in France for describing Holocaust remembrance as "memorial pornography". http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/nicolas-anelka-anti-semitic-gesture-quenelle-2966787
6. The 'Quennele' hand sign has been described as anti-establishment and anti-zionist by French youth and famous football players (e.g. Anelka). It stoked serious controversy in France since first being used by anti-establishment comedian Dieudonné M'Bala M'Bala in 2005.  M'Bala has been barred from many theatres and convicted many times for his 'freedom of speech.' www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/nicolas-anelka-anti-semitic-gesture-quenelle-2966787
7. As part of "internal security" enactments passed in 2003, it is an offense to insult the national flag or anthem, with a penalty of a maximum 9,000 euro fine or up to six months' imprisonment. Restrictions on "offending the dignity of the republic", and include "insulting" anyone who serves the public.
8. French Rap Star Facing Prison - For Insulting the French State, insulting Napoleon and Charles de Gaulle. http://www.nme.com/news/Monsieur-R/23193 . Hence, it is illegal to insult the French state and it seems it's sacred historical characters like Napoleon and Charles De Gaulle?!
9. Nicolas Sarkozy, then-Interior Minister and former President of the Republic (until 2012), ordered the firing of the director of Paris Match  — because he had published photos of Cécilia Sarkozy (his wife) with another man in New York.
10. In 2006, rapper 'Joestarr' had his rap song against President Sarkozy censored. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_in_France#List_of_censored_songs
11. The following films have been censored in France, (not for provoking violence): L'Essayeuse (1976)Romance (1999)Le Mur (2011)
12. Under France's "Public Health Code" passed on the 31 December 1970,  "positive presentation of drugs" and the "incitement to their consumption" comes with up to five years in prison and fines up to €76,000. Newspapers such as Charlie Hebdo and associations, political parties, and various publications criticizing the current drug laws and advocating drug reform in France have been repeatedly hit with heavy fines based on this law.  http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCodeArticle.do?idArticle=LEGIARTI000006688178&cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006072665
13. Muslim women are barred from education (it's not just the Taliban just restrict education for girls) in France, if they practise their religion by wearing a headscarf, despite French schools having no uniform policy, and crosses on necklaces are being allowed.
14. "France’s law against “religious symbols in public spaces” is specifically enforced to target Muslim women who choose to wear hijab—ironic considering we’re now touting Charlie Hebdo as a symbol of France’s staunch commitment to civil liberties." http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/01/09/trolls-and-martyrdom-je-ne-suis-pas-charlie.html
15. It is illegal in France take the opinion of the Turkish side on the then civil war involving Armenians, i.e. illegal to deny that the killing of Amenians by Turkish troops was a deliberate genocide.
16. In 2007, a tribunal in Lyon sentenced Bruno Gollnisch and fined him €5,000 for the offence of contesting some of the information about the Holocaust and ordered him to pay €55,000 euros in damages to the plaintiffs and to pay for the judgment to be published in the newspapers that originally printed his remarks.
17. Last year France was the first country in the World that banned Pro-Palestinian Marches during the Gaza war.
18. And we have already mentioned the ridiculous niqab ban and ban on headscarves in official buildings (like schools and hospitals).

Charlie Hebdo
This was created out of a magazine that was banned (!) for criticising the former French Leader General De Gaulle. It used to satirise the ruling elite but lost its way and has become a forum for ‘petit white racism’ according to some writers and in order to boost its circulation it started to target Muslims through insults and is active in a process of dehumanising Muslims and undermining Islam through insult rather than critique. As stated, they will not criticise other groups now.

The Apologist
It is right to criticize the murders in Paris because they were wrong. A complete misapplication of Islam has occurred and Islam/Muslims  has been put in a negative light. Hence, many ‘Muslim leaders’ trot themselves out to line up and condemn these abhorrent acts. However, they are nearly always so silent when other wrongs are perpetrated. Where are these same leaders when Muslims are  drone bombed, or starving, or gassed or leaders are thinking of another bombing campaign against Muslims or increased surveillance and more anti-terror (anti-Muslim) laws?

The Fallacy of Freedom of Speech
The starting point in any discussion should not be Freedom of Speech is a Universal Right and that we should debate its limits (where we draw the ‘red lines’) – this is the Ideological Liberal / Secular position of modern Western political thought. No – the starting point should be basic human civility and respect for each other (not to insult others through whatever depravity they have) and the onus should be on the Freedom of Speech fundamentalists to explain why there is a need to insult.
Freedom of Speech is a completely flawed theory both in theory and how it is applied. It has NEVER EVER been implemented and can never be. Freedom of Speech always has limits and is in itself a self-contradiction:
In a Kingdom the monarch (King) is the source of Laws – the domain of the King. Freedom means that the source of Law is ‘being free’ – which means no laws. Hence the contradiction. You cannot have freedom! You can be free of things like slavery, debt etc but can never have freedom. It is a false slogan. Islam recognised this when the Prophet* stated that ‘This world is like a prison to the believers and like a paradise to the unbelievers’ and that Muslims are slaves to Allah and His Law.

Even the countries that falsely claim to have Freedom of Speech do not have it because there are laws that limit ‘Free Speech’ such as:
- defamation laws
- libel laws
- sedition laws
- public order laws
- holocaust denial laws
- the case of the British Muslim blogger who wrote something negative about British  soldiers on Facebook and was sent to jail
- the Australian Muslim who wrote letters to families of Australian soldiers was sent to jail
- the new laws proposed by the UK government monitoring the way Muslims think (thought police) by making it an obligation on nursery teachers, schools, universities, nurses and police to report Muslim ideas as being ‘radical’

Selective Outrage
Where was the Freedom of Speech outrage to Western civilisation when the above things happened? Or when Professors critical of Israel were sacked or denied jobs? Or the open ability to criticise Israel or the recent Gaza bombing? Or the use of illegal weapons by America in Falluja? Or the outrage as 10,000 children die each day through poverty and effects of war?

To speak freely or to insult freely
Can we all use the N-word, or shout ‘Fire’ in a crowded place, or can we teach our children to insult parents and teachers. If we teach children not to insult as basic human dignity why should we say it’s okay to insult other ‘just because you can’? It is right to account people but not to insult.
Modern secular liberal philosophy is implemented through its military and forced upon people and those that disagree are NOT TOLERATED!! Muslims are resisting because we hold on to the Qur’an and Sunnah and love our Prophet and do not like to accept military dictators etc!
Islam has always allowed critique and criticism if done with respect. However, pure insults are not tolerated easily. Insults are the last bastion of those that have lost the argument who resort to insult rather than dialogue. This happened with many of the Prophets and with the Quraish targeting our Prophet*. The Prophet dealt with these insults and they are even recorded in the Qur’an! People who insult have no intention to engage but merely project their own insecurities to others and only offer hate and divisiveness.
All beliefs have ‘Red Lines’ and we should not accept being insulted nor racist insults against our Prophet*. The reaction is not to rise up and kill people. We can demonstrate – but what is the sense in people dying in demonstrations – where the Prophet* said the life of a Believer is worth more than the Kaaba? Our response should be proportionate and legal – according to Islam (Qur’an and Sunnah).
The sense of ‘holy’ has now shifted from the Divine to secular gods like Freedom of Speech! Think about it!!
Freedom of Speech is an empty slogan not a universal basic right and we should base human interaction on civility / kindness and elevate our values. The best way to move forward is to implement Islam completely in how we live and how society is governed. Rather than shying away from society it is more important now to interact more positively with society and correct the injustices – through dialogue and interaction.