18 November 2012
Happy New Year - 1434
Summary
Seerah: Najran Delegation and the death of the Prophet*’s son (Ibrahim)
The Delegation of the Christians of Najran
False Christian belief in Jesus being a God and 'Original Sin'
Christians debated with the Prophet* and stayed in his masjid
Quranic Ayah revealed and challenged the Christians with a curse for the liars
Christians agree a peace treaty and to pay Jizyah
2 men from Bani ‘Amir bin Sa‘sa‘a try to kill the Prophet*, one dies of illness and the other struck by lightning
Death of the Prophet*’s Son (Ibrahim) followed by coincidental eclipse
What is Qur’an
Qur’an is from the word Qara’a = to read or recite
Qur’an linguistically means the book that has been read or recited.
Shariah term, Qur’an: 'is Allah’s miraculous speech revealed unto Muhammad* in Arabic and transferred to us by the Tawatur method'
Revelation of the Qur’an in stages over 23 years
Arrangement and verified by Jibreel and Prophet*
Compiled into book later
Has clearcut and ambiguous meanings
Asbaab an-nuzool (Circumstances of revelation)
The types of abrogation
Seerah of Muhammed*
*: May the peace blessings and Mercy of Allah be upon him
TMQ: Translation to the nearest meaning of the Qur’an
The Delegation of the Christians of Najran
Many delegations of major Arab tribes are now reaching Medina, some asking for power others for friendship with whole tribes declaring acceptance of Islam. One with a special significance was from Najran. At the time of the Prophet*, Najran and its surrounding area, in the south of Arabia, was a Christian valley. It had a Bishop called Abu Harithah ibn ‘Alqamah who was considered an authority on the Christian faith. He was in touch with Byzantine emperors who respected him, sent him financial aid and helped build a number of churches in the area. In response to a letter sent by the Prophet* inviting them to Islam they sent a delegation of 60 people to Medina in order to get first-hand information about the Prophet*.
The Najranis had sympathy with much of Muhammad’s teaching, and admired the religious practices he was inaugurating – but they were concerned to defend the role of Jesus as the Divine Son of God, the second ‘person’ in their Holy Trinity. All Christian theologians, no matter to which branch of the Christian Church they belonged, understood that the entire edifice of Christianity as it was then being propounded depended on the literal acceptance of the doctrine of an original sin, which was then passed on to all humanity by inheritance, from which it was impossible for any human being, no matter how devout, to escape without extra Divine help. Thus, it was a necessary part of the faith that God Himself should become incarnate in human flesh, a being that was both God and Man – and therefore more than Man - to bring about the means for Man to escape the clutches of original sin; but at the same time he had to be part of humanity, so that Man might logically be the one paying the redemption for that sin. Jesus, they reasoned, was this God-Man, and the whole point of his incarnation on earth was in order to die as a sacrifice of God Himself, to God Himself, to save or redeem humanity from its impossible situation.
Once this doctrine of original sin was questioned, or the free grace and compassion of God accepted so that there was no need of sacrificial redemption from sin, then the notion of an incarnate saviour became unnecessary and nonsensical. The whole edifice of Christianity would be undercut – and this was the very real danger the Christian intellectuals grasped immediately. So, the Christians defended Trinitarianism and the divinity of Jesus, whereas Muhammad called them to recognise the Oneness of God and the spiritual unity of all humanity.
The Christians allowed to camp in the Medina Mosque
The Christians were treated with the utmost hospitality, and to allay their fears were allowed to have their tents erected in the security of Prophet*’s mosque, where they had all provisions of food and drink supplied to them. They made ready to meet him by taking off their travel (secular) clothes and putting on their ceremonial robes of fine silk embroidered with crosses, and gold rings. However, when they greeted the Prophet* he did not respond. They continued to wait on, and at the end of the day went to find Uthman b. Affan and Abdu’r Rahman b. Awf, who were known to them. They explained they had waited all day, and did not know what they were supposed to do. They had received the Prophet*’s letter and responded – should they now go home again, without speaking to him? Ali, who was with Uthman and Abdu’r Rahman, suggested they should take off their copes and rings, and try again. Sure enough, when the Prophet* approached him the next time, they were successful.
When meeting with the Prophet* he, after returning their greetings, spoke to them in his friendly manner. When the time came for the asr prayer, they also prayed, facing the east, the Prophet* allowing them to do so. They assured the Prophet* that they did not intend to change their faith, but wanted to hear what he had to say about Jesus. He told them that he had nothing to say that day, but they should wait. The next morning the Christians came forward, led by the Bishop.
‘O Muhammad,’ the Bishop opened, ‘Tell us what it is that you say about the Lord, the Messiah?’ ‘He is a servant of God,’ replied the Prophet*, ‘one chosen by God, and who answered Him.’ ‘Do you know whether his birth was caused by a father?’ ‘He was not born of human intercourse,’ replied the Prophet*, ‘so he could not have a father.’ ‘Then how can you say that he is a servant who has been created, when you consider all created servants to have been born as the result of human intercourse, and to have fathers?’
The Prophet* said, “I have nothing to say about him today. You have to stay until I can tell you what will be said to me about Jesus, peace be upon him.”
Revelation about Jesus (‘Isa)
Next morning, the Prophet* received fresh Qur’anic revelations which stated: “Jesus, in God’s view, is the same as Adam, whom He had created from dust and said to him: ‘Be’, and he was there. This is the truth from your Lord. Be not, therefore, one of the doubters. Should anyone argue with you about him after what has been given to you of true knowledge, say to them: let us call in our children and your children, our women and your women, and ourselves and yourselves. Let us then all pray God and ask that God’s curse overwhelm the liars.” (Al-Imran 3: 59-61)
When the Prophet* told the Najran delegation the following day what information he had received about Jesus, they refused to accept it. The Prophet* then offered them the challenge which was outlined in the Qur’anic verses quoted above. It was a serious challenge. It meant for the Najran people that they risked being cursed by a Prophet* and a Messenger of God. Such a prospect was not to be trifled with.
The Challenge of a Mubahalah and Treaty Signed
The Prophet* recited this to the Christians. Next the angel revealed that he should issue the challenge of a mubahalah, that they should pray, and let the One True God send His curse on the party which was not declaring the truth.
The Najrani leaders held a consultation, and decided to act cautiously - for if the Prophet* truly was a Messenger of God, they would have invoked disaster upon themselves. Their unanimous view was to wait until the following morning, and then watch carefully to see what the Prophet* did. If he came out with his children and his family showing he had the confidence to risk their safety, then they would withdraw from the contest of prayer; but if he came out defended by Companions ready to support him, then they should let the contest go ahead, for in that case, he would be showing that he did not have real confidence.
So the Christians came out early with the Bishop at their head, to see whether or not the Prophet* would emerge with his family. He came out holding the hand of a younger man, two little boys walked in front of him (and scurried shyly beneath his cloak when he stopped), and a woman followed behind.
‘Who are these people?’ asked the Bishop. ‘That is his cousin Ali b. Abu Talib, who is also his son-in-law and the father of his two grandsons,’ he was told, ‘the most beloved of all creatures to him. Those children are the sons of his daughter by Ali. That woman is his daughter, Fatimah, the dearest of people to him and the closest to his heart.’ The Bishop looked at the other Christian leaders. ‘He has come out with the special members of his family, trusting in his own truthfulness,’ he said. ‘By God, he would not have come with them if he was afraid that the proof would be against him.’ The others agreed. So the Bishop called out that they would not make a contest of prayer, but would make peace with him.
The Messenger of Allah* then admitted that agreement and ordered them to pay Al-Jizya (i.e. tribute) and he made peace with them for the provision of two thousand garments, one thousand of them to be delivered in Rajab, the other thousand ones in Safar. With every garment they had to pay an ounce (of gold). In return they will have the covenant of Allah and His Messenger*. He gave them a covenant that provides for practicing their religious affairs freely. They asked the Prophet* to appoint a trustworthy man to receive the money agreed on for peace, so he sent them the trustworthy man of this nation Abu ‘Ubaidah bin Al- Jarrah to receive the amounts of money agreed on in the peace treaty. By the time Islam started to spread in Najran, naturally, they did not have to pay Al-Jizya that usually non-Muslims paid. Whatever the case was, it was said that Al-Aqib and As-Saiyid embraced Islam as soon as they reached Najran on their journey back home. It is also said that the Prophet* sent to them ‘Ali too, for the collection of charities and tribute.
The terms of the peace agreement:
In the name of God, the Merciful, the Beneficent. This is what Muhammad, the Prophet* and God’s Messenger, has written down for the people of Najran when he has the authority over all their fruits, gold, silver, crops and slaves. He has benevolently left them all that in return for 2,000 hullas every year, 1,000 to be given in the month of Rajab and 1,000 in the month of Safar. Each hulla is equal to one ounce [a measure equal to 4 dirhams]. The Najran are also required to provide accommodation and expenses for my messengers, for up to 20 days. None of my messengers shall be kept in Najran more than one month. They are also required to give, as a loan, 30 shields, 30 horses and 30 camels, in case of any disorder and treachery in Yemen. If anything is lost of the shields, horses or camels they loan to my messenger, it will remain owing by my messenger until it is given back. Najran has the protection of God and the pledges of Muhammad, the Prophet*, to protect their lives, faith, land, property, those who are absent and those who are present, and their clan and allies.
They need not change anything of their past customs. No right of theirs or their religion shall be altered. No bishop, monk or church guard shall be removed from his position. Whatever they have is theirs, no matter how big or small. They are not held in suspicion and they shall suffer no vengeance killing. They are not required to be mobilized and no army shall trespass on their land. If any of them requests that any right of his should be given to him, justice shall be administered among them. He who takes usury on past loans is not under my protection. No person in Najran is answerable for an injustice committed by another.
It is useful to mention here that should a follower of an earlier religion state that Muhammad is a Prophet* or a Messenger of God, his statement does not bring him into the fold of Islam. This statement is not sufficient to make him a Muslim. What it signifies is that the man knows that Muhammad* is a messenger of God, but to be a Muslim is much more than mere knowledge, even when it is expressed in words and statements. To be a Muslim is to believe in God’s oneness and in the message of Muhammad* and to accept that in practice, making obedience to God and to the Prophet*, in public and in private, one’s way of life.
The Delegation of Bani ‘Amir bin Sa‘sa‘a
Among the group of delegates were ‘Amir bin At-Tufail — the enemy of Allah, Arbad bin Qais — Labid’s maternal brother, Khalid bin Ja‘far, and Jabbar bin Aslam. All of them were the leaders and satans of their people. ‘Amir was the one who doublecrossed the group of Ma‘una well. When this delegation made their mind to come to Medina, ‘Amir and Arbad conspired to kill the Prophet* . So when the group of delegates arrived, ‘Amir kept on talking to the Prophet* whereas Arbad turned aside trying to draw his sword. He managed to draw a span of hand long but Allah stilled his hand so that he was unable to proceed with its withdrawal. Allah protected the Prophet*. The Prophet* invoked Allah against them. So when they returned, Allah sent down a thunderbolt unto Arbad and his camel and he was burnt. As for ‘Amir he called at a house of a woman who was from Bani Salul and had a gland sore. He eventually died while he was saying: "What am I like? I have a gland similar to a camel’s. And here I am dying in the house of the woman from Bani Salul." In Sahih Al-Bukhari it is narrated that ‘Amir came to the Prophet* and said: "I grant you an opportunity to choose one of two: you will have the flat land people and I will have townspeople; or I will succeed you. Otherwise, I will invade your people with a thousand he-camels and a thousand shecamels." But, later on he got plague-stricken in a woman’s house. So he said: "What! I have a gland similar to a camel’s, and here I am in a woman’s house of Bani so and so people. Fetch me my mare!" He mounted it but died on its back.
Death of the Prophet*’s Son (Ibrahim)
The untroubled happiness of the early months of this year came to an end with the illness of Ibrahim. It was soon clear that he would not survive. He was tended by his mother and her sister Sirin, The Prophet* visited him continually, and was with him when he was dying. As the child breathed his last, he took him in his arms, and tears flowed from his eyes. His forbidding of vociferous lamentation had made prevalent the notion that all expressions of woe at bereavement were to be discouraged, and the mistaken idea still lingered on in many minds. "0 Messenger of God," said 'Abd ar-Rahrnan ibn 'Awf, who was present, "this is what thou hast forbidden. When the Muslims see thee weeping, they too will weep." The Prophet* continued to weep, and when he could find his voice he said: "Not this do I forbid. These are the promptings of tenderness and mercy, and he that is not merciful, unto him shall no mercy be shown. O Ibrahim, if it were not that the promise of reunion is sure, and that this is a path which all must tread, and that the last of us shall overtake the first, verily we should grieve for thee with a yet greater sorrow. Yet are we stricken indeed with sorrow for you, O Ibrahim. The eye weeps, and the heart grieves, nor say we anything that would offend the Lord."!
He spoke words of comfort now to Mariyah and Sirin, assuring them that Ibrahim was in Paradise. Then, having left them for a brief while, he returned with 'Abbas and Fa91. The young man washed the body and laid it out, while the two older men sat and watched him. Then it was borne forth to the cemetery on its little bier. The Prophet* led the funeral prayer and prayed again for his son at the edge of the grave after Usamah and Fadl had laid in it the body. When the earth had been heaped over it, he still lingered at the graveside, and calling for a skin of water he bade them sprinkle it over the grave. Some unevenness had been left in the earth, and noticing this he said: "When one of you doeth aught, let him do it to perfection." And smoothing it over with his hand, he said of his own particular action: "No harm it doth nor good, but it giveth relief unto the soul of the afflicted.":
He had already stressed more than once the need to make perfection one's aim in every earthly act, and many of his sayings indicate that this aim must be unworldly and detached. 'Ali is said to have summed up the Prophet*'s guidance in this respect as follows: "Do for this world as if to live for ever and for the next as if to die upon the morrow." To be always ready to depart is to be detached. "Be in this world as a stranger or as a passer-by," the Prophet* said.
On the day of Ibrahim's death, not long after his burial, there was an eclipse of the sun; but when some of the people attributed it to the Prophet*'s bereavement he said: "The sun and the moon are two signs of the signs of God. Their light is not dimmed for any man's death. Ifye see them eclipsed, ye should pray until they be clear."
Main Topic: What is the Qur’an?
What is the Qur’an?
It is necessary to define the Qur’an, from this definition we will know what is allowed to be read in prayer and what is not. What is a proof in Hukm Shara’i and what is not? It also tells us what makes somebody a Kafir due to what he denies and what does not constitute disbelief. So when we define Qur’an we mean the Qur’an as evidence in Fiqh.
Qur’an is derived from the word Qara’a, which means to read or recite. Therefore, Qur’an linguistically means the book that has been read or recited.
As a (Shariah) term, Qur’an is Allah’s miraculous speech revealed unto Muhammad* in Arabic and transferred to us by the Tawatur method.
The recitation of Qur’an is considered as an Ibadah (act of worship). By Allah’s speech it is meant that the Qur’an is the exact words of Allah. It was revealed to Muhammad* as it exists today. By ‘miraculous’ it is meant that no one can produce something similar to it. The term “in Arabic” refers to the language of the Qur’an, not to its scope or ideas because Qur’an addresses all Arabs and non-Arabs. The rules of Qur’an are universal and not restricted to one ethnic group or a specific area or time. All the Qu’ran is completely in Arabic and contains no foreign tongue. Furthermore, the ignorance of the Arabs about some words of the Quran is not evidence that the Quran contains foreign words. Rather there is a possibility that some non-Arabs learned some Arabic words and then it became wide spread in their language. Because of this some of their words may correspond to some words mentioned in the Quran, or maybe some foreign words entered in the Arabic language. And hence it became part of the Arabic language itself and therefore cannot be considered a foreign word anymore as the Arabs used it as part of their language, even if its root is foreign.
Many verses point that the Quran is completely in Arabic such as: “Verily, We have sent it down as an Arabic Qur’an.” (TMQ Yusuf: 2) “A Book whereof the Verses are explained in detail - a Qur’an in Arabic for people who know.” (TMQ Fussilat: 3) “An Arabic Quran with no crookedness in it, perchance they will be God fearing.” (TMQ Al-Zumar: 29) “We verily, have made it a Qur’an in Arabic.” (TMQ Zukhruf: 3)
By Tawatur method it is meant that a group or people for whom it is impossible to lie or conspire to fabricate a lie conveyed it to us. The Qur’an was transferred to us through an entire generation, not just by a group, to its successors, until it reached the present generation, without any interval in this transference.
Reciting Qur’an in Arabic by itself, without even comprehending its meaning is considered an Ibadah. In this regard, Qur’an is different from Hadith, which cannot be recited as an act of Ibadah. However, thinking about the meanings of both the Qur’an and Hadith is considered an Ibadah.
Revelation of the Qur’an
The Qur’an was revealed to Prophet* Muhammad* in parts for a period of twenty-three years. It used to be revealed in various ways. Sometimes the revelation would come in quick succession and other times it would take a long time. The Qur’an was revealed gradually and not all at once due to wisdom (Hikma) Allah has mentioned in the noble Qur’an itself: “And those who disbelieve say: ‘Why is not the Qur’an revealed to him all at once?’ Thus (it is send down in parts), that We may strengthen your heart thereby.” (TMQ Al-Furqan: 32)
So, in order to strengthen the heart of the Messenger*, and so as to recite it to the people slowly without haste, and also in order to reveal it according to incidents and answers to questions, the Qur’an was revealed gradually and in parts for twenty-three years.
As we mentioned in previous study circles the scholars have defined fiqh as ‘the knowledge of the practical Shariah rules that are derived from their detailed evidences’.
Qur’an and Shariah
Knowledge of the Shariah rules began the day when they were revealed by Allah. This took place mostly after the migration (Hijra) of the Prophet* from Mecca to Medina. The Prophet* stayed in Mecca for thirteen years, and then he resided in Medina for about ten years. The Quran was revealed in Mecca and continued throughout the Prophet*’s stay in Medina. Many of the verses of Ahkam (rules) were revealed in Medina. In this period verses from the Qur’an were revealed and the Messenger* used to convey the Ahkam relating to answering practical questions and providing solutions to problems that arose.
The portion that was revealed in Mecca is approximately about two thirds of the Qur’an and they are known as the Meccan verses (Makki). In their totality they barely deal with few Ahkam. Rather they are confined to explaining the fundamentals of the Deen and calling people to them, such as the belief in Allah and His Messenger, the Day of Judgement, the command to perform Salah, characterisation with moral attributes such as honesty, truthfulness, and forbidding evil actions such as fornication, murder, burying girls alive, deficiency in the measure and scales etc. The second portion that was revealed in Medina is close to a third of the Qur’an and they are known as the Medinan verses (Madani). These are verses of Mu'amalat (transactions) such as selling, renting and usury. They also include the Hudud, such as the Hadd of Zina (fornication) and stealing. They include the Jinayat (capital punishments) such as killing the one who killed someone intentionally or punishment of highway robbers and rules from the Bayyinat (testimonial evidences) such as the testimony of Zina and the rest of the testimonies. The remaining rules concerning the worships (Ibadat) such as fasting, Zakah, Hajj and Jihad were also revealed during this period.
Arrangement of the Qur’an
During the time of the Prophet*, the text of the Qur’an was preserved in memory and also inscripted on flat stones, wood, and bones. The Qur’an used to be revealed to the Prophet* and he used to instruct people to memorise it and write it down on pieces of leather, paper, scapula, palm risp, bones, leaf stalks of date palm etc. When the Ayat were revealed he used to give the order that they be placed in their proper place in the Surah (chapter). Thus, he used to say put this Ayah in such and such Surah after such and such Ayah. So they used to put them in their proper place in the Surah. It has been narrated by Uthman that he said, “The Ayat used to be revealed to the Prophet* and so he used to say: “Put these Ayat in the Surah which mentions such and such thing.” (Ibn Majah & Abu Dawud) It was done in this manner until the whole Qur’an was revealed and Allah took his* soul after the revelation of the Qur’an was complete. That is why the arrangement of the verses of every Surah in the form as it is in now in the present script (Mushaf) was determined by the revelation (Tawqeefan) from the Prophet* transmitted to him* by Jibreel from Allah. According to this arrangement the Ummah transmitted the Qur’an from the Prophet* and there is no dispute about this. The order of the verses within the chapters (Surahs) was in the same form as we see today.
Compilation of the Qur’an
This was covered is last week’s Study Circle
Open & Hidden meaning?
The noble Qur’an does not have a Zaahir (outer) or Baatin (secret) meaning as some claim. It is an Arabic speech, which has come in the tongue of the Arabs. He said: “We have sent it down as an Arabic Qur’an.” (TMQ Yusuf: 2) “In the plain Arabic language.” (TMQ Ash-Shu’ara: 195)
It is understood the same way as any Arabic speech is understood. What Allah intends by the Qur’an is what has been expressed by the noble Qur’an itself. Allah did not intend anything other than what was expressed. His intention is only understood from understanding of the syntax. The Arabic meaning is what Allah intended in His speech, which He expressed in the Arabic words and Arabic style. Accordingly, the import of the speech is what the speech indicated, through the linguistic proofs and the Shar’i indication mentioned in the Kitaab or Sunnah. This has no ‘outer’ or ‘inner’; it rather has a meaning indicated by the Arabic speech, through the understanding of the Arabic words and styles.
The Muhkamaat (clearcut) and Mutashaabihaat (ambiguous)
The Qur’an is composed of Ayat which are Muhkamaat (clearcut) and Ayat which are Mutashaabihaat (ambiguous), due to the saying of Allah: “In it are Verses that are entirely clear, they are the foundations of the Book; and others not entirely clear.” (TMQ Al-Imran: 7)
As for the Muhkam (clear) part, it is the text whose meaning is apparent and clear such that it precludes the possibility of having any other meaning, i.e. its indication is explicit and not open to interpretation. Such as the saying of Allah: “Allah has permitted trading and forbidden Riba (usury).” (TMQ Al-Baqarah: 275) “Cut off (from the wrist joint) the (right) hand of the thief, male or female.” (TMQ Al-Ma’ida: 38)
As for the Mutashaabih (ambiguous) part, it is the opposite of Muhkam. It is the text which is open to more than one meaning. For example: “Or you have been in contact with women.” (TMQ Al-Ma’ida: 6) “And the Face of your Lord full of Majesty and Honour will abide forever.” (TMQ Ar-Rahman: 27) “For verily, you are under Our Eyes.” (TMQ At-Tur: 48)
And other such examples, whose wording have a number of conflicting meanings cannot be reconciled. Rather they need a linguistic Qareenah (indication), which would specify one of the meanings. It might also have an apparent meaning that implies anthropomorphisation of Allah, a matter that is not possible, either rationally or by Shar’a, for the word to indicate. So, it needs a linguistic or Shar’i Qareenah (indication) to determine the intended meaning.
Asbaab an-nuzool (Circumstances of revelation)
Some jurists have coined the term ‘Asbab an-nuzool’ for incidents that the revelation came to clarify. The question arises, do these Ahkam remain specific (Khass) to these incidents and not go beyond them or do we apply these Ahkam on every similar incident (Aam)? The answer is, these Ahkam are applied on every similar incident and this is established in two ways:
1. By examining all the Ayat which were revealed clarifying the rules of these incidents we find that they came with expressions that were general and not specific and hence they must be taken in their generality.
2. The Messenger* took these Ahkam in their generality and applied them on every similar incident.
So the Ayah of stealing was revealed regarding the theft of Majn or Rida of Safwaan, the Ayah of Zihar with regards to Salamah bint Sakhar or Khawlah bint Tha’labah the wife of Aws b. Saamit, the Ayah of imprecation (Li’aan) regarding Hilal b. Umayyah. Even though they were all revealed regarding specific incidences the Messenger* and the Sahabah (may Allah be pleased with them) took them as general due to their general form and they applied them on every similar incident. This is proven by the Sunnah and Ijma of the Sahabah. It was from these evidences that the following Shariah principle was deduced: ‘The consideration is for the generality of the expression and not for the specificity of the cause’.
Abrogation (Naskh)
Linguistically abrogation means canceling (Izaalah) or changing the thing and transforming it from one state to another while it still exists in essence.
Technically, it is the address (Khitaab) of the legislator which prevents the continuation of a Hukm Shar’i of a previous address (Khitaab).
As for the term abrogator (Naasikh) it may refer to Allah: “Whatever a Verse (revelation) do We abrogate.” (TMQ Al-Baqarah: 106) Or it may refer to an Ayah: Thus, we say the Ayah of the sword’ (At-Tawbah: 29) abrogated so and so Ayah. Allah has informed us of the occurrence of abrogation and the Ahkam which have been abrogated show us its true occurrence: “Whatever a Verse (revelation) do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, We bring a better one or similar to it. Know you not that Allah is able to do all things?” (TMQ Al-Baqarah: 106)
The types of abrogation:
a) Abrogation of the Hukm of the speech (Khitaab) without an alternative Hukm
b) Abrogation with a lighter alternative:
c) Abrogation with a similar alternative Hukm:
d) Abrogation with a more difficult alternative Hukm.
What is abrogated
It is important to know what is abrogated, is the Hukm and not the recitation, this is what has been proven. Thus we can see the abrogation of the Hukm of the one year Iddah period and the abrogation of bequests by parents. As for the two Ayat which have been abrogated, they are still recited and this is the case for the rest of the abrogated Ayat. As for the abrogation of recitation, such a case is not to be found. The absence of this type of abrogation is an evidence to say it is not allowed. As for the Ahadith mentioned regarding this subject they are all Ahad (singular) narrations which cannot be relied upon in matters of Aqeedah.
How abrogation takes place
• First: Abrogation of the Qur’an with Qur’an:
• Second: Abrogation of the Sunnah by Sunnah.
• Third: Abrogation of Sunnah by the Qur’an:
• Fourth: It is not allowed to abrogate the Hukm established by Ijma.
• Fifth: Abrogating the Hukm of Qiyas.
• Sixth: It is not allowed for the Kitab to be abrogated by the Mutawaatir Sunnah.
For all of these reasons the Mutawaatir Sunnah cannot abrogate Qur’an. So by greater reason (Min Bab awla) the Qur’an cannot be abrogated by the Ahad (singular narrations) of the Sunnah. As in addition to what we have said about the Mutawaatir Sunnah the singular narrations are Dhanni (speculative) and the definite (Qata’i) cannot be abrogated by the speculative (Dhanni). However a hadith may specify a rule mentioned in the Quran such as the specification of lashing for the unmarried fornicator as the Sunnah stipulates stoning for the married adulterer. Similarly, the Mutawaatir Sunnah cannot be abrogated by the Ahad (singular) narrations of the Sunnah, because the Mutawaatir is stronger than the Ahad. The definite report is not removed by the speculative report.
Children’s Feedback & News Topic:
How to do Dawah to Non-Muslims
Muharram (Islamic New Year 1434)
Pray for people in Gaza
Bank of Akhirah:
Parents and Children were asked to think about anything they have done over the past week purely for the sake of Allah, with Ihsaan and sincerity. Thus seeking the pleasure of Allah alone. Then put these on a piece of paper and put it in the cardboard Kaaba at the start of the next Study Circle.
Please write them anonymously.
Homework
Seerah ~ Nil
Belief / Actions ~ How do we derive laws in Islam – what is the process
Showing posts with label Literary Miracle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Literary Miracle. Show all posts
Monday, 19 November 2012
Monday, 22 October 2012
21 October 2012
Summary
Seerah:
Negus the king of Abyssinia (Ethiopia) died.
The death of Umm Kulthum, the daughter of the Prophet*
The death of ‘Abdullah Ibn Ubayy - the head of hypocrites
Abu Bakr leads the Hajj delegation
Belief Pathway: Who authored the Qur'an?
The Qur’an can only the work of the following:
- Non-Arab
- Arab
- Companions
- Muhammad
- The Creator, Allah (swt)
The Qur’an challenges the world to produce anything like itself to disprove Islam
The Qur’anic style is unique
We accept it is a living miracle from Allah and are then obliged to follow everything in it
Seerah of Muhammed*
*: May the peace blessings and Mercy of Allah be upon him
TMQ: Translation to the nearest meaning of the Qur’an
After the Battle some other events
During this year many events of great significance took place. They were:
Negus Ashama; the king of Abyssinia (Ethiopia), died so the Prophet* performed prayer in absentia for him.
The death of Umm Kulthum, the daughter of the Prophet*, the Prophet felt extremely sad at her death. “Had I got a third daughter, I would let you marry her.” He said to ‘Uthman.
The stoning of the adulteress
Buraidah, a companion of the Prophet*, reported that a man called “Ma’ez bin Malek Al-Aslami came to the Prophet* and said: I have wronged myself; purge me of my sin. The Prophet* turned him away saying, woe is you! Go back and pray God to forgive you. The following day Ma’ez came to the Prophet* again and said: I have committed a carnal sin. Purge me, God’s Messenger. Again the Prophet* turned him away.
The fourth time the man came and the Prophet* asked him: What shall I purge you of? Of the sin of adultery, the man said. Is he insane, the Prophet* asked his companions? No, he was told. Is he drunk, the Prophet* asked again? A man sniffed at him and found no smell of alcohol. The Prophet* asked: Did you fornicate? Yes, the man answered. The Prophet then gave his orders and the man was stoned. The people were divided among themselves, some said Ma’ez is ruined and damned for good with his sin; others said there is no better act of repentance than Ma’ez’s- he came of his own accord, put his hand in the Prophet*’s hand and told him fair and square: Stone me, for I have sinned.
The two groups kept arguing for two, three days. The Prophet* came to them while they were sitting debating the issue. He greeted them and sat down. Pray God to forgive Ma’ez bin Malek, the Prophet* said, so the people did. The Prophet* added: He made such a staggering act of repentance that would have absolved a whole nation.
The narrator said: Then a Ghamedi woman from the Uzd tribe came to the Prophet*. Godsend Messenger, she said, purge me of my sin. The Prophet turned her away, saying: Woe is you! Go back, pray God to forgive you and repent. The following day she came to the Prophet* again and said: Godsend Messenger, I see you are trying to turn me away like you turned Ma’ez bin Malek away. Why, what’s it to you, he said? She said she was pregnant. Was it you (Mu’az committed adultery with), the Prophet* asked? Yes, the woman said. Wait till you deliver the child you carry, the Prophet* said.
An Ansari man vouchsafed to be responsible for her till she delivers the baby. When she gave birth she came back to the Prophet* with the child in swaddles. Here is the child I have delivered, she said. We shall not stone her and let the baby starve with no one to feed him, the Prophet* said. Go and suckle the baby until he is weaned.
When she weaned the baby, she came to the Prophet* with the child holding a piece of bread in his hand. She said: Godsend Prophet, here he is. I have weaned him and he can eat now. The Prophet* entrusted the child to one of the Muslims then pronounced the punishment of stoning.”
The death of ‘Abdullah Ibn Ubayy - the head of hypocrites
As to the cousin of Abu 'Amir, Ibn Ubayy, in the month after Tabuk he fell seriously ill, and after a few weeks it was clear that he was dying. The traditional accounts differ as to the state of soul in which he died, but all are unanimous that the Prophet led the funeral prayer for him, and prayed beside his grave when he had been buried. According to one tradition, when the Prophet had already taken his stand for the prayer, Umer went to him and protested against the bestowal of such grace upon a hypocrite, but the Prophet answered him, saying with a smile: "Stand thou behind me, Umer. I have been given the choice, and I have chosen. It hath been said unto me: Ask forgiveness for them, or ask it not, though thou ask forgiveness for them seventy times, yet will not God forgive them. I And did I know that God would forgive him if I prayed more than seventy times, I would increase the number of my supplications.'" Then he led the prayer and walked beside the bier to the cemetery and stood beside his grave. Not long afterwards the verse was revealed, with reference to the hypocrites: “And never pray the funeral prayer over one of them who dieth, nor stand beside his grave, for verily they disbelieved in God and His Messenger, and died in their iniquity?”
Abu Bakr leads the Hajj delegation
In the month Dhul-Qa‘dah or in Dhul-Hijjah of the very year (the ninth of Al-Hijra), the Prophet* dispatched Abu Bakr (May Allah be pleased with him), the truthful, as a deputy prince of Al-Hajj (pilgrimage), so that he would lead the Muslims in performing of the pilgrimage rituals.
Soon after the departure of the Muslims, there came a Revelation from Allah: the opening passages of the Chapter 9 entitled ‘Repentance’ (Surah Tauba or Bara’a) in which ‘freedom from obligation’ is proclaimed from Allah in regard to those idolatrous tribes who had shown no respect for the treaties which they had entered into with the Prophet*. Communication of this news went in line with the Arabian traditions of making public any change relating to declining conventions of blood and fortunes.
‘Ali bin Abi Talib was deputed to make this declaration. He overtook Abu Bakr at Al-‘Arj or Dajnan. Abu Bakr inquired whether the Prophet* had put him in command or he had just been commissioned to make the announcement. “I have been deputed to make the proclamation only” replied ‘Ali. The two Companions then proceeded with the pilgrimage process. Towards the close of the rituals, on the day of the ritual sacrifice, ‘Ali stood at Al-Jamrah (a spot at which stones are pelted) and read aloud to the multitudes that thronged around him and declared quittance from covenants with idolaters and giving them four months’ respite to reconsider their position. As for the other idolaters with whom the believers had a treaty and had abated nothing of the Muslims’ rights nor had supported anyone against them, then the terms of the treaty would run valid until the duration of which expired. Abu Bakr then sent some Muslims to declare publicly that no disbeliever would after that year perform pilgrimage, nor would anyone be allowed to make the Tawaf (going round) of the Sacred House unclothed. That proclamation in fact vetoed all aspects of paganism out of Arabia and stated quite unequivocally that those pre-Islam practices were no longer in operation.
Main Topic: Belief ~
Who authored the Qur’an
It follows that since the Creator, Allah (swt) has created man, life and the universe, there must have been a purpose for the creation and a means, i.e. systems, by which to achieve it. The obvious questions that proceed are:
- How does man receive the purpose, rules and regulations, given by the Creator, by which he is to govern and understand his life?
- In what form are these rules and regulations received by man?
Clearly, either man communicates with the Creator or that the Creator communicates with us to explain our existence. Man, however, is limited and unable to comprehend or perceive the unlimited and as such cannot communicate with the Creator. This obvious fact therefore, means that the communication had to come from the Creator.
Throughout history, there have been messengers and prophets, men sent from the Creator, bringing laws or revelation on how man should conduct his life. They were given miracles which proved to mankind that they were bringing revelation. A miracle is something which goes against the laws of nature. For example prophet Musa (Moses) had a stick which parted the Red Sea. Prophet Isa (Jesus) had the ability to cure the sick by just touching them.
But how do we know if these messengers existed? The miracles performed by the above prophets were only miracles for that specific period of time. But how do we know that they were not just legends or fables? They are not proof for us. So what miracle do we have right now to convince us and guide us through our lives?
There are many texts available today claiming divine status from God. But is the guidance contained in them in its original form and is it applicable to all situations at all times? Any text claiming to be divine must not contain contradictions, discrepancies or adulterations, since this would question the perfection of God and the validity of the text.
If we apply this acid test to these ‘divine texts’, we find that non except the Qur’an fulfill the above criteria. Many religions contain aspects of the same truth (since messengers have come to teach each nation) but this truth has been tampered with by man.
Muslims believe that the Qur’an is the Word of God. They believe it is complete, i.e. it provides answers for all of life’s affairs and it has kept its authenticity. i.e. nothing has been removed or added to it by any man since it was revealed, but as we could not believe in the Creator, God (Allah [swt]), until we became intellectually convinced, similarly the ‘divine’ message must be examined and proved. There needs to exist a rational proof for the validity of the text, not a blind emotional argument.
The Qur’an was revealed to Muhammad (saw - may be peace and blessings of Allah [swt] be upon him and his family). At the time it was revealed, the pagan Arabs were deeply into poetry. It was an indication of nobility in society. People used to go to the desert for days just to write poetry. The Arabic language has great fluidity and depth of expression, so it was held high in esteem by the Arabs.
So we need to consider the authorship of the Qur’an. The Qur’an can only the work of the following:
• Non-Arab
• Arab
• Companions
• Muhammad
• The Creator, Allah (swt)
Firstly, it is important to point out here that the Qur’an was revealed in Arabic. Because of the high standard of the Arabic used by the Qur’an, indeed its very excellence and mastery of the language, it is not from a non-Arab. It is well known that, a non-Arab aged 16 called Jabr was charged with conspiring with Muhammad* in writing the Qur’an, but Allah (swt) replied to these allegations: "And we know well that they say: only a man teaches him. The speech of him at whom they falsely hint is notably foreign, while this is Arabic, pure and clear." [T.M.Q 16:103]
Now one would turn to the Arabs for the authorship of the Qur’an, having dismissed the theory that a non-Arab could have written it as being ridiculous. One of the disbelieving Arab poets of the time, Walid ibn Al-Mughira said after hearing the Qur’an, "None of you is more conversant than I with poetry, melodious hymns and songs, and by God never did I hear anything similar to which he says. It is so sweet and so graceful that it remains at the summit with nothing to surpass it."
People who disbelieved the divine authenticity were sent revelation challenging them to bring forth any similar writing: "...They may say, ‘He forged it.’ Say, ‘Bring ye then ten surahs (chapters) forged, like unto it, and call (to your aid) whomsoever ye can other than God! If ye speak the truth.’ [T.M.Q 11:13] And when the Arabs failed to meet this, they were challenged once more. "And if ye are in doubt as to what we have revealed from time to time to our servant, then produce a chapter like there unto call to your witnesses or helpers (if there are any) besides God, if your doubts are true." [T.M.Q 2:23]
They tried to bring the like of the Qur’an but they failed. And this challenge has remained until this day for everyone, both Muslim and non-Muslim and both the Arab and the non-Arab. Clearly, it is not the speech of an Arab, let alone non-Arab. The Companions were also Arab so it means they couldn’t write it either.
The Qur’anic challenge is unique because the Creator, Allah (swt), pushes man to use his ability to undermine the authenticity of the Qur’an. Such a profound yet simple challenge. Imagine throughout the history of Islam, all her enemies needed to defeat this challenge to destroy the whole basis of Islam. Yet not one, non-Muslim Arab or non-Arab has been able to do this even though all the tools of the Arabic language are at their disposal.
It is also inconceivable that the Qur’an is the speech of Muhammad*. After all he is one of the Arabs. Also, whatever level of genius people may assign to him, he is still a human being and one of his tribe and nation. Since the Arabs failed to bring the like of the Qur’an, this equally applies to Muhammad*. He could not bring the like of it, thus it is not from him. It is important to point out that none of the Arabs, who despised Muhammad*, particularly at that time, that were the most acquainted with the styles of Arabic speech ever claimed that the Qur’an was Muhammad’s* speech, or even similar to his speech. Moreover, it is clearly documented that Muhammad* was illiterate i.e. he could not read not write. Infact illiteracy is a proof in itself.
Also the traditions (ahadith) of Muhammad* are completely unlike the linguistic style of the Qur’an. This is the case even though Muhammad* would utter the revealed Qur’anic verse and say the tradition at one sitting. How could a man maintain a completely different style for 23 years? Strangely, people could copy the style of his traditions but not that of the Qur’an! We have established that the Qur’an could not have originated from a non-Arab, Arab or Muhammad*. This leaves us with the only real source, the Creator, Allah (swt). He (swt) says: "Do they not ponder about the Qur’an? If it had come from God they would surely have found therein much contradictions." [T.M.Q:82]
To this day Muslim and non-Muslim scholars have not been able to find any contradiction or mistake in the Qur’an. Moreover, if one was to compare letter by letter a copy of the Qur’an published today to one of the first copies of the Qur’an available then one would find that not a single letter has been omitted or added. Copies of the Qur’an dating back to the first century of Islam can be found in Istanbul and Tashkent.
Thus it is clear that the basis of Islam, the Quran, could only have come from the one who created language in order to produce a book that surpasses the language of any human. And from the one who created science in order to put in the Quran knowledge that no human knew of, only until recently. Therefore, the Quran can only have come from the Creator, Allah (swt).
If the Qur'an is the word of God, and a miracle proving the Prophet-hood of Muhammad (pbuh) we must look carefully at this book and establish without doubt its authenticity. It is well known that the pagan Arabs of the time of Muhammad (pbuh) were great poets and writers of the Arabic language. It was common at the time for them to go into the desert to study Arabic and write poetry and prose with which to entertain each other. They held the Arabic language with all its fluidity and depth of expression in great esteem. When the revelation started to come to Muhammad in his fortieth year it was the style of language which set the revelation apart from anything that had been before or indeed since.
The unshakable proof of the authenticity of the Qur'an as the word of God is in its style of language. The Qur'an remains completely at the height of eloquence, rhetoric, and coherent expression. It acts as one complete piece, with the style the same as if it is one sentence, with perfect arrangements and strong plain text. The expressions brought were not known to the Arabs at the time or before that time, and matters cannot be expressed that have not been previously felt. One of the disbelieving Arab poets of the time Walid ibn Al Mughirah said after hearing the Qur'an: "By God: None of you is more conversant than I with poetry, melodious hymns, and songs, and by God never did I hear anything similar to which he says. It is so sweet, and so graceful that it remains at the summit with nothing to surpass it."
The Qur'an is in a literary style that no human can approach or match. Its style the Arabs cannot match, and it is this challenge which God has set forth within the Qur'an. "Or they say: He has invented it? Say: then bring a Surah like unto it and call (for help) on all ye can besides Allah if you are truthful"[10:38]
It is this challenge to all that doubt that has remained unanswered in over 1400 years since this revelation. Not one scholar of the Arabic language either Muslim or Non-Muslim has been able to write even one small chapter or paragraph in the same style of Arabic to that of the Qur'an. The Arabs are either able to imitate the style of the Qur'an or not, if they could then the book is clearly the work of men like them. If not then there are only two other possible sources Muhammad, or God.
Muhammad (pbuh) was of Arabic blood and tongue but never claimed to be the author of the Qur'an. In fact he was never challenged as its author, it can be seen clearly from Hadith Mutawatir (definitely confirmed sayings of Muhammad - narrated word for word) of which there are many hundreds that the style of language in Muhammad's speech and the Qur'an are very different. And no matter how hard one tries, one's style of speech cannot be completely altered consistently, and certainly not over a period of 23 years in which the Qur'an was revealed. The only accusation ever leveled at Muhammad (pbuh) was that he received it from a Christian youth called Jaber. As a response to this allegation God revealed: "We know indeed that they say, 'It is a man that teaches him.' The tongue of him they wickedly point to is notably foreign, while this is Arabic, pure and clear."[16:103]
Since it is proved that the Qur'an is neither the speech of the Arabs nor the speech of Muhammad*, it is definitely the speech of Allah as this is the only rational possibility we are left with.
The Qur’anic challenge is unique because the Creator, Allah (swt), pushes man to use his ability to undermine the authenticity of the Qur’an. It is such a profound yet simple challenge. Imagine throughout the history of Islam, all her enemies needed to defeat this challenge to destroy the whole basis of Islam. Yet not one, non-Muslim Arab or non-Arab has been able to do this even though all the tools of the Arabic language are at their disposal. The Western government’s hatred of Islam is well known. All they have to do in order to defeat Islam and to make over one billion Muslims apostatise from it, is not to spend billions of dollars in invading Afghanistan, Iraq and launching a mythical ‘war on terror’. They simply have to produce one chapter similar to the Qur’an.
There are many texts available today claiming divine status from God, like the Bible of the Christians and the Torah of the Jews etc. However, they have no proof that they have been revealed by God, if they are not miraculous in nature then there is no reason to believe in them. As Muslims we believe that Allah (swt) revealed different books through history such as the original Injeel (Bible) and Torah, Allah (swt) informed us of this in the Qur’an this is why we believe these. However, we have also been informed that these books have been altered and therefore the versions that exist today are not that which was revealed by Allah (swt). Besides this, the Qur’an is the final revelation from Allah (swt) which abrogates all others.
Allah (swt) says, "Say ye: "We believe in Allah, and the revelation given to us, and to Abraham, Isma'il, Isaac, Jacob, and the Tribes, and that given to Moses and Jesus, and that given to (all) Prophets from their Lord: we make no difference between one and another of them: and we bow to Allah (in Islam)." [TMQ Al-Baqarah:136]
Once we have established through rational proof that Allah (Swt) exists and that the Qur’an is the Word of Allah, we must believe in everything that the Qur’an informs us of and commands us with, whether we can perceive them or not. Therefore, we must have Iman (belief) in the Day of Resurrection, in paradise (jannah) and hell, in reckoning and punishment, in angels, in jinn, in Shayaateen and all others that the Qur'an or hadeeth mutawaatir (definitive narrations) have mentioned. To believe in these things is therefore not irrational just because we cannot see them or sense them physically as we have conclusively proved the Qur’an being from Allah (swt) which informs us about all of these.
"O you who believe! Believe in Allah and His messenger, and the Book which He sent to His Messenger and the Book which He sent to those before (him). Any who denies Allah, His Angels, His Books, His Messengers, and the Day of Judgement, has gone far, far astray." [An-Nisa: 136]
Once the Iman in Allah, His Messenger and the Qur’an has been proven, every Muslim is obliged to believe in the Islamic Shari’ah as a whole. We cannot pick and choose as we like. As the Shariah was revealed in the glorious Qur'an, and the Messenger* conveyed it. If someone disbelieves in this he would be a (disbeliever) Kafir. Therefore, it is disbelief (Kufr) to deny the shariah rules as a whole, or any definite detailed rule amongst them. This is the case whether these ahkam (rules) are connected with worships (ibadaat), transactions (mu'amalaat), punishments (uqoobat), food, etc. So the rejection of the verse: "So establish regular prayer" [Al-Baqarah: 43]
Is the same as rejecting the following verses: "But Allah has permitted trade and forbidden usury," [Al-Baqarah: 275] "As to the thief, male or female, cut off his or her hands," [Al-Ma’idah: 38] "Forbidden to you (for food) are dead meat, blood, the flesh of swine, and that on which has been invoked the name of any other than Allah." [Al-Ma’idah: 3]
We must completely surrender to all the rules revealed by Allah (swt) whether we see rational reasons for them or not. "But no, by your Lord, they can have no (real) faith, until they make you judge in all the disputes between them, and find in their souls no resistance against your decisions, but accept them with the fullest submission." [An-Nisa: 65].
Children's feedback:
- Virtues of the first 10 days of Dhul-Hijjah
- Choosing between right and wrong decisions
News Topic:
- Car crash in a boys bedroom
Homework:
Qur'an: How was the Qur'an protected after the death of the Prophet* ?
Summary
Seerah:
Negus the king of Abyssinia (Ethiopia) died.
The death of Umm Kulthum, the daughter of the Prophet*
The death of ‘Abdullah Ibn Ubayy - the head of hypocrites
Abu Bakr leads the Hajj delegation
Belief Pathway: Who authored the Qur'an?
The Qur’an can only the work of the following:
- Non-Arab
- Arab
- Companions
- Muhammad
- The Creator, Allah (swt)
The Qur’an challenges the world to produce anything like itself to disprove Islam
The Qur’anic style is unique
We accept it is a living miracle from Allah and are then obliged to follow everything in it
Seerah of Muhammed*
*: May the peace blessings and Mercy of Allah be upon him
TMQ: Translation to the nearest meaning of the Qur’an
After the Battle some other events
During this year many events of great significance took place. They were:
Negus Ashama; the king of Abyssinia (Ethiopia), died so the Prophet* performed prayer in absentia for him.
The death of Umm Kulthum, the daughter of the Prophet*, the Prophet felt extremely sad at her death. “Had I got a third daughter, I would let you marry her.” He said to ‘Uthman.
The stoning of the adulteress
Buraidah, a companion of the Prophet*, reported that a man called “Ma’ez bin Malek Al-Aslami came to the Prophet* and said: I have wronged myself; purge me of my sin. The Prophet* turned him away saying, woe is you! Go back and pray God to forgive you. The following day Ma’ez came to the Prophet* again and said: I have committed a carnal sin. Purge me, God’s Messenger. Again the Prophet* turned him away.
The fourth time the man came and the Prophet* asked him: What shall I purge you of? Of the sin of adultery, the man said. Is he insane, the Prophet* asked his companions? No, he was told. Is he drunk, the Prophet* asked again? A man sniffed at him and found no smell of alcohol. The Prophet* asked: Did you fornicate? Yes, the man answered. The Prophet then gave his orders and the man was stoned. The people were divided among themselves, some said Ma’ez is ruined and damned for good with his sin; others said there is no better act of repentance than Ma’ez’s- he came of his own accord, put his hand in the Prophet*’s hand and told him fair and square: Stone me, for I have sinned.
The two groups kept arguing for two, three days. The Prophet* came to them while they were sitting debating the issue. He greeted them and sat down. Pray God to forgive Ma’ez bin Malek, the Prophet* said, so the people did. The Prophet* added: He made such a staggering act of repentance that would have absolved a whole nation.
The narrator said: Then a Ghamedi woman from the Uzd tribe came to the Prophet*. Godsend Messenger, she said, purge me of my sin. The Prophet turned her away, saying: Woe is you! Go back, pray God to forgive you and repent. The following day she came to the Prophet* again and said: Godsend Messenger, I see you are trying to turn me away like you turned Ma’ez bin Malek away. Why, what’s it to you, he said? She said she was pregnant. Was it you (Mu’az committed adultery with), the Prophet* asked? Yes, the woman said. Wait till you deliver the child you carry, the Prophet* said.
An Ansari man vouchsafed to be responsible for her till she delivers the baby. When she gave birth she came back to the Prophet* with the child in swaddles. Here is the child I have delivered, she said. We shall not stone her and let the baby starve with no one to feed him, the Prophet* said. Go and suckle the baby until he is weaned.
When she weaned the baby, she came to the Prophet* with the child holding a piece of bread in his hand. She said: Godsend Prophet, here he is. I have weaned him and he can eat now. The Prophet* entrusted the child to one of the Muslims then pronounced the punishment of stoning.”
The death of ‘Abdullah Ibn Ubayy - the head of hypocrites
As to the cousin of Abu 'Amir, Ibn Ubayy, in the month after Tabuk he fell seriously ill, and after a few weeks it was clear that he was dying. The traditional accounts differ as to the state of soul in which he died, but all are unanimous that the Prophet led the funeral prayer for him, and prayed beside his grave when he had been buried. According to one tradition, when the Prophet had already taken his stand for the prayer, Umer went to him and protested against the bestowal of such grace upon a hypocrite, but the Prophet answered him, saying with a smile: "Stand thou behind me, Umer. I have been given the choice, and I have chosen. It hath been said unto me: Ask forgiveness for them, or ask it not, though thou ask forgiveness for them seventy times, yet will not God forgive them. I And did I know that God would forgive him if I prayed more than seventy times, I would increase the number of my supplications.'" Then he led the prayer and walked beside the bier to the cemetery and stood beside his grave. Not long afterwards the verse was revealed, with reference to the hypocrites: “And never pray the funeral prayer over one of them who dieth, nor stand beside his grave, for verily they disbelieved in God and His Messenger, and died in their iniquity?”
Abu Bakr leads the Hajj delegation
In the month Dhul-Qa‘dah or in Dhul-Hijjah of the very year (the ninth of Al-Hijra), the Prophet* dispatched Abu Bakr (May Allah be pleased with him), the truthful, as a deputy prince of Al-Hajj (pilgrimage), so that he would lead the Muslims in performing of the pilgrimage rituals.
Soon after the departure of the Muslims, there came a Revelation from Allah: the opening passages of the Chapter 9 entitled ‘Repentance’ (Surah Tauba or Bara’a) in which ‘freedom from obligation’ is proclaimed from Allah in regard to those idolatrous tribes who had shown no respect for the treaties which they had entered into with the Prophet*. Communication of this news went in line with the Arabian traditions of making public any change relating to declining conventions of blood and fortunes.
‘Ali bin Abi Talib was deputed to make this declaration. He overtook Abu Bakr at Al-‘Arj or Dajnan. Abu Bakr inquired whether the Prophet* had put him in command or he had just been commissioned to make the announcement. “I have been deputed to make the proclamation only” replied ‘Ali. The two Companions then proceeded with the pilgrimage process. Towards the close of the rituals, on the day of the ritual sacrifice, ‘Ali stood at Al-Jamrah (a spot at which stones are pelted) and read aloud to the multitudes that thronged around him and declared quittance from covenants with idolaters and giving them four months’ respite to reconsider their position. As for the other idolaters with whom the believers had a treaty and had abated nothing of the Muslims’ rights nor had supported anyone against them, then the terms of the treaty would run valid until the duration of which expired. Abu Bakr then sent some Muslims to declare publicly that no disbeliever would after that year perform pilgrimage, nor would anyone be allowed to make the Tawaf (going round) of the Sacred House unclothed. That proclamation in fact vetoed all aspects of paganism out of Arabia and stated quite unequivocally that those pre-Islam practices were no longer in operation.
Main Topic: Belief ~
Who authored the Qur’an
It follows that since the Creator, Allah (swt) has created man, life and the universe, there must have been a purpose for the creation and a means, i.e. systems, by which to achieve it. The obvious questions that proceed are:
- How does man receive the purpose, rules and regulations, given by the Creator, by which he is to govern and understand his life?
- In what form are these rules and regulations received by man?
Clearly, either man communicates with the Creator or that the Creator communicates with us to explain our existence. Man, however, is limited and unable to comprehend or perceive the unlimited and as such cannot communicate with the Creator. This obvious fact therefore, means that the communication had to come from the Creator.
Throughout history, there have been messengers and prophets, men sent from the Creator, bringing laws or revelation on how man should conduct his life. They were given miracles which proved to mankind that they were bringing revelation. A miracle is something which goes against the laws of nature. For example prophet Musa (Moses) had a stick which parted the Red Sea. Prophet Isa (Jesus) had the ability to cure the sick by just touching them.
But how do we know if these messengers existed? The miracles performed by the above prophets were only miracles for that specific period of time. But how do we know that they were not just legends or fables? They are not proof for us. So what miracle do we have right now to convince us and guide us through our lives?
There are many texts available today claiming divine status from God. But is the guidance contained in them in its original form and is it applicable to all situations at all times? Any text claiming to be divine must not contain contradictions, discrepancies or adulterations, since this would question the perfection of God and the validity of the text.
If we apply this acid test to these ‘divine texts’, we find that non except the Qur’an fulfill the above criteria. Many religions contain aspects of the same truth (since messengers have come to teach each nation) but this truth has been tampered with by man.
Muslims believe that the Qur’an is the Word of God. They believe it is complete, i.e. it provides answers for all of life’s affairs and it has kept its authenticity. i.e. nothing has been removed or added to it by any man since it was revealed, but as we could not believe in the Creator, God (Allah [swt]), until we became intellectually convinced, similarly the ‘divine’ message must be examined and proved. There needs to exist a rational proof for the validity of the text, not a blind emotional argument.
The Qur’an was revealed to Muhammad (saw - may be peace and blessings of Allah [swt] be upon him and his family). At the time it was revealed, the pagan Arabs were deeply into poetry. It was an indication of nobility in society. People used to go to the desert for days just to write poetry. The Arabic language has great fluidity and depth of expression, so it was held high in esteem by the Arabs.
So we need to consider the authorship of the Qur’an. The Qur’an can only the work of the following:
• Non-Arab
• Arab
• Companions
• Muhammad
• The Creator, Allah (swt)
Firstly, it is important to point out here that the Qur’an was revealed in Arabic. Because of the high standard of the Arabic used by the Qur’an, indeed its very excellence and mastery of the language, it is not from a non-Arab. It is well known that, a non-Arab aged 16 called Jabr was charged with conspiring with Muhammad* in writing the Qur’an, but Allah (swt) replied to these allegations: "And we know well that they say: only a man teaches him. The speech of him at whom they falsely hint is notably foreign, while this is Arabic, pure and clear." [T.M.Q 16:103]
Now one would turn to the Arabs for the authorship of the Qur’an, having dismissed the theory that a non-Arab could have written it as being ridiculous. One of the disbelieving Arab poets of the time, Walid ibn Al-Mughira said after hearing the Qur’an, "None of you is more conversant than I with poetry, melodious hymns and songs, and by God never did I hear anything similar to which he says. It is so sweet and so graceful that it remains at the summit with nothing to surpass it."
People who disbelieved the divine authenticity were sent revelation challenging them to bring forth any similar writing: "...They may say, ‘He forged it.’ Say, ‘Bring ye then ten surahs (chapters) forged, like unto it, and call (to your aid) whomsoever ye can other than God! If ye speak the truth.’ [T.M.Q 11:13] And when the Arabs failed to meet this, they were challenged once more. "And if ye are in doubt as to what we have revealed from time to time to our servant, then produce a chapter like there unto call to your witnesses or helpers (if there are any) besides God, if your doubts are true." [T.M.Q 2:23]
They tried to bring the like of the Qur’an but they failed. And this challenge has remained until this day for everyone, both Muslim and non-Muslim and both the Arab and the non-Arab. Clearly, it is not the speech of an Arab, let alone non-Arab. The Companions were also Arab so it means they couldn’t write it either.
The Qur’anic challenge is unique because the Creator, Allah (swt), pushes man to use his ability to undermine the authenticity of the Qur’an. Such a profound yet simple challenge. Imagine throughout the history of Islam, all her enemies needed to defeat this challenge to destroy the whole basis of Islam. Yet not one, non-Muslim Arab or non-Arab has been able to do this even though all the tools of the Arabic language are at their disposal.
It is also inconceivable that the Qur’an is the speech of Muhammad*. After all he is one of the Arabs. Also, whatever level of genius people may assign to him, he is still a human being and one of his tribe and nation. Since the Arabs failed to bring the like of the Qur’an, this equally applies to Muhammad*. He could not bring the like of it, thus it is not from him. It is important to point out that none of the Arabs, who despised Muhammad*, particularly at that time, that were the most acquainted with the styles of Arabic speech ever claimed that the Qur’an was Muhammad’s* speech, or even similar to his speech. Moreover, it is clearly documented that Muhammad* was illiterate i.e. he could not read not write. Infact illiteracy is a proof in itself.
Also the traditions (ahadith) of Muhammad* are completely unlike the linguistic style of the Qur’an. This is the case even though Muhammad* would utter the revealed Qur’anic verse and say the tradition at one sitting. How could a man maintain a completely different style for 23 years? Strangely, people could copy the style of his traditions but not that of the Qur’an! We have established that the Qur’an could not have originated from a non-Arab, Arab or Muhammad*. This leaves us with the only real source, the Creator, Allah (swt). He (swt) says: "Do they not ponder about the Qur’an? If it had come from God they would surely have found therein much contradictions." [T.M.Q:82]
To this day Muslim and non-Muslim scholars have not been able to find any contradiction or mistake in the Qur’an. Moreover, if one was to compare letter by letter a copy of the Qur’an published today to one of the first copies of the Qur’an available then one would find that not a single letter has been omitted or added. Copies of the Qur’an dating back to the first century of Islam can be found in Istanbul and Tashkent.
Thus it is clear that the basis of Islam, the Quran, could only have come from the one who created language in order to produce a book that surpasses the language of any human. And from the one who created science in order to put in the Quran knowledge that no human knew of, only until recently. Therefore, the Quran can only have come from the Creator, Allah (swt).
If the Qur'an is the word of God, and a miracle proving the Prophet-hood of Muhammad (pbuh) we must look carefully at this book and establish without doubt its authenticity. It is well known that the pagan Arabs of the time of Muhammad (pbuh) were great poets and writers of the Arabic language. It was common at the time for them to go into the desert to study Arabic and write poetry and prose with which to entertain each other. They held the Arabic language with all its fluidity and depth of expression in great esteem. When the revelation started to come to Muhammad in his fortieth year it was the style of language which set the revelation apart from anything that had been before or indeed since.
The unshakable proof of the authenticity of the Qur'an as the word of God is in its style of language. The Qur'an remains completely at the height of eloquence, rhetoric, and coherent expression. It acts as one complete piece, with the style the same as if it is one sentence, with perfect arrangements and strong plain text. The expressions brought were not known to the Arabs at the time or before that time, and matters cannot be expressed that have not been previously felt. One of the disbelieving Arab poets of the time Walid ibn Al Mughirah said after hearing the Qur'an: "By God: None of you is more conversant than I with poetry, melodious hymns, and songs, and by God never did I hear anything similar to which he says. It is so sweet, and so graceful that it remains at the summit with nothing to surpass it."
The Qur'an is in a literary style that no human can approach or match. Its style the Arabs cannot match, and it is this challenge which God has set forth within the Qur'an. "Or they say: He has invented it? Say: then bring a Surah like unto it and call (for help) on all ye can besides Allah if you are truthful"[10:38]
It is this challenge to all that doubt that has remained unanswered in over 1400 years since this revelation. Not one scholar of the Arabic language either Muslim or Non-Muslim has been able to write even one small chapter or paragraph in the same style of Arabic to that of the Qur'an. The Arabs are either able to imitate the style of the Qur'an or not, if they could then the book is clearly the work of men like them. If not then there are only two other possible sources Muhammad, or God.
Muhammad (pbuh) was of Arabic blood and tongue but never claimed to be the author of the Qur'an. In fact he was never challenged as its author, it can be seen clearly from Hadith Mutawatir (definitely confirmed sayings of Muhammad - narrated word for word) of which there are many hundreds that the style of language in Muhammad's speech and the Qur'an are very different. And no matter how hard one tries, one's style of speech cannot be completely altered consistently, and certainly not over a period of 23 years in which the Qur'an was revealed. The only accusation ever leveled at Muhammad (pbuh) was that he received it from a Christian youth called Jaber. As a response to this allegation God revealed: "We know indeed that they say, 'It is a man that teaches him.' The tongue of him they wickedly point to is notably foreign, while this is Arabic, pure and clear."[16:103]
Since it is proved that the Qur'an is neither the speech of the Arabs nor the speech of Muhammad*, it is definitely the speech of Allah as this is the only rational possibility we are left with.
The Qur’anic challenge is unique because the Creator, Allah (swt), pushes man to use his ability to undermine the authenticity of the Qur’an. It is such a profound yet simple challenge. Imagine throughout the history of Islam, all her enemies needed to defeat this challenge to destroy the whole basis of Islam. Yet not one, non-Muslim Arab or non-Arab has been able to do this even though all the tools of the Arabic language are at their disposal. The Western government’s hatred of Islam is well known. All they have to do in order to defeat Islam and to make over one billion Muslims apostatise from it, is not to spend billions of dollars in invading Afghanistan, Iraq and launching a mythical ‘war on terror’. They simply have to produce one chapter similar to the Qur’an.
There are many texts available today claiming divine status from God, like the Bible of the Christians and the Torah of the Jews etc. However, they have no proof that they have been revealed by God, if they are not miraculous in nature then there is no reason to believe in them. As Muslims we believe that Allah (swt) revealed different books through history such as the original Injeel (Bible) and Torah, Allah (swt) informed us of this in the Qur’an this is why we believe these. However, we have also been informed that these books have been altered and therefore the versions that exist today are not that which was revealed by Allah (swt). Besides this, the Qur’an is the final revelation from Allah (swt) which abrogates all others.
Allah (swt) says, "Say ye: "We believe in Allah, and the revelation given to us, and to Abraham, Isma'il, Isaac, Jacob, and the Tribes, and that given to Moses and Jesus, and that given to (all) Prophets from their Lord: we make no difference between one and another of them: and we bow to Allah (in Islam)." [TMQ Al-Baqarah:136]
Once we have established through rational proof that Allah (Swt) exists and that the Qur’an is the Word of Allah, we must believe in everything that the Qur’an informs us of and commands us with, whether we can perceive them or not. Therefore, we must have Iman (belief) in the Day of Resurrection, in paradise (jannah) and hell, in reckoning and punishment, in angels, in jinn, in Shayaateen and all others that the Qur'an or hadeeth mutawaatir (definitive narrations) have mentioned. To believe in these things is therefore not irrational just because we cannot see them or sense them physically as we have conclusively proved the Qur’an being from Allah (swt) which informs us about all of these.
"O you who believe! Believe in Allah and His messenger, and the Book which He sent to His Messenger and the Book which He sent to those before (him). Any who denies Allah, His Angels, His Books, His Messengers, and the Day of Judgement, has gone far, far astray." [An-Nisa: 136]
Once the Iman in Allah, His Messenger and the Qur’an has been proven, every Muslim is obliged to believe in the Islamic Shari’ah as a whole. We cannot pick and choose as we like. As the Shariah was revealed in the glorious Qur'an, and the Messenger* conveyed it. If someone disbelieves in this he would be a (disbeliever) Kafir. Therefore, it is disbelief (Kufr) to deny the shariah rules as a whole, or any definite detailed rule amongst them. This is the case whether these ahkam (rules) are connected with worships (ibadaat), transactions (mu'amalaat), punishments (uqoobat), food, etc. So the rejection of the verse: "So establish regular prayer" [Al-Baqarah: 43]
Is the same as rejecting the following verses: "But Allah has permitted trade and forbidden usury," [Al-Baqarah: 275] "As to the thief, male or female, cut off his or her hands," [Al-Ma’idah: 38] "Forbidden to you (for food) are dead meat, blood, the flesh of swine, and that on which has been invoked the name of any other than Allah." [Al-Ma’idah: 3]
We must completely surrender to all the rules revealed by Allah (swt) whether we see rational reasons for them or not. "But no, by your Lord, they can have no (real) faith, until they make you judge in all the disputes between them, and find in their souls no resistance against your decisions, but accept them with the fullest submission." [An-Nisa: 65].
Children's feedback:
- Virtues of the first 10 days of Dhul-Hijjah
- Choosing between right and wrong decisions
News Topic:
- Car crash in a boys bedroom
Homework:
Qur'an: How was the Qur'an protected after the death of the Prophet* ?
Tuesday, 2 October 2012
30 September 2012
Summary
Seerah: Battle of Tabuk Return Journey
The Army of Islam at Tabuk and 'Abd ar-Rahman ibn 'Awf leads the Prophet* in prayer
No-Show from the Romans at Tabuk so The Prophet* consolidates the Islamic State through treaties with the Christian Kings (agreeing to pay JIZYA)
Khalid bin Al-Waleed captures the King ‘Ukaidir who was hunting Bulls
Returning to Medina from Tabuk - Hadhaifa disrupts a plot to kill the Prophet*
The People Who lagged Behind made their excuses to the Prophet*
Destroying the Masjid of Dirar as Abu 'Amir al-Faasiq wanted to have a base to fight against Islam and the mosque provided a good cover for this. Allah revealed their plot.
Belief: The Miraculous Qur’an
Many claimed scientific miracles in the Qur’an
Qur’anic statements about the embryos
Limits of purely scientific interpretations as theory can change, unless established truth
Literary Miracle of the Qur’an (Qur’an’s Challenge)
Only the Qur’an has been able to synthesise these three elements Grammar (syntax), Poetry (Style) and Meaning in a written form
Seerah of Muhammed*
*: May the peace blessings and Mercy of Allah be upon him
TMQ: Translation to the nearest meaning of the Qur’an
The Army of Islam at Tabuk
During the northward march it happened one day at dawn that the Prophet was delayed in making his ablution. The men were in lines for the prayers and they waited for him until they feared that the sun would rise before they had prayed. Then it was agreed that 'Abd ar-Rahman ibn 'Awf should lead them, and they had already prayed one of the two prayer cycles when the Prophet appeared. 'Abd ar-Rahman was about to draw back, but the Prophet motioned him to remain where he was, and he himself joined the congregation. When they had uttered the greeting of Peace which ends the prayer the Prophet rose and prayed the cycle he had missed. When he had finished he said: "Ye have done well, for verily a Prophet doesn’t die until he hath been led in prayer by a pious man of his people."
Arriving at Tabuk and camping there, the Muslim army was ready to face the enemy. There, the Prophet* delivered an eloquent speech that included the most inclusive words. In that speech he urged the Muslims to seek the welfare of this world and the world to come. He warned and cherished them and gave them good tidings. By doing that he cherished those who were broken in spirits, and blocked up the gap of shortage and mess they were suffering from due to lack of supplies, food and other substances.
No-Show from the Romans at Tabuk so The Prophet* consolidates the Islamic State through treaties with the Christian Kings (agreeing to pay JIZYA)
Upon learning of the Muslims’ march, the Byzantines and their allies were so terrified that none of them dared set out to fight. On the contrary they scattered inside their territory. It brought, in itself, a good credit to the Muslim forces. That had gained military reputation in the mid and remote lands of Arabian Peninsula. The great and serious political profits that the Muslim forces had obtained, were far better than the ones they could have acquired if the two armies had been engaged in military confrontation. The Head of Ailah, Yahna bin Rawbah came to the Prophet*, made peace with him and paid him the tribute (Al- Jizya). Both of Jarba’ and Adhruh peoples paid him tribute, as well. So the Prophet* gave each a guarantee letter, similar to Yahna’s, in which he says: "In the Name of Allah, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful. This is a guarantee of protection from Allah and Muhammad the Prophet, the Messenger of Allah, to Yahna bin Rawbah and the people of Ailah; their ships, their caravans on land and sea shall have the custody of Allah and the Prophet Muhammad, he and whosoever are with him of Ash-Sham people and those of the sea. Whosoever contravenes this treaty, his wealth shall not save him; it shall be the fair prize of him that takes it. Now it should not be lawful to hinder the men from any springs which they have been in the habit of frequenting, nor from any journeys they desire to make, whether by sea or by land."
The Prophet* dispatched Khalid bin Al-Waleed at the head of four hundred and fifty horsemen to ‘Ukaidir Dumat Al-Jandal and said to him: "You will see him hunting oryxes." So when Khalid drew near his castle and was as far as an eye-sight range, he saw the oryxes coming out rubbing their horns against the castle gate. As it was a moony night Khalid could see Ukaidir come out to hunt them, so he captured him — though he was surrounded by his men — and brought him back to the Prophet*, who spared his life and made peace with him for the payment of two thousand camels, eight hundred heads of cattle, four hundred armours and four hundred lances. He obliged him to recognize the duty of paying tribute and charged him with collecting it from Dumat, Tabuk, Ailah and Taima’.
The tribes, who used to ally the Byzantines, became quite certain that their dependence on their former masters came to an end. Therefore they turned into being pro-Muslims. The Islamic state had therefore enlarged its borders to an extent that it, touched the Byzantines’ and their agents’ borders. So we see that the Byzantine agents role was over.
Returning to Medina from Tabuk
The Muslim army returned from Tabuk victoriously, undeceived or wronged. That was because Allah had sufficed them the evils of fight. On the way back and at a mountain road, twelve hypocrites sought the Prophet’s life and that was while he was passing along that mountain road with only Ammar holding the rein of his she-camel and Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman driving it, at the time that people had already gone down into the bottom of the valley. The hypocrites seized that opportunity to seek the Prophet’s life. As the Prophet* and his two companions were moving along, they heard thrusts of people coming towards him from behind with their faces veiled. Hudhaifa, who was sent by the Prophet to see what was going on, saw them and stroke their mounts’ faces with a crook in his hand and Allah cast fear into their hearts. They fled away and overtook their people. However, Hudhaifa named them to the Prophet* and informed him of their intentions. So that was why Hudhaifa was called the "confidant" of the Prophet*. About this event Allah, the Exalted says: "And they resolved that (plot to murder Muhammad) which they were unable to carry out." [Al-Qur'an 9:74]
When his headquarters, Medina, began to loom at the horizon, the Prophet [pbuh] said: "This is a cheerful sight. This is Uhud, which is a mountain, we like it and it likes us." When the Medinese learnt of their arrival they set out to meet the army. Women, youths, youngsters and small children went out of town to celebrate their home-return wholeheartedly singing: "The full moon shone down upon us, through the traits of Al-Wada‘ Mountain. Thanks is due to us, as long as a supplicator invokes to Allah.."
The Prophet*’s march to Tabuk was in Rajab and his return in Ramadan. So we see that this Ghazwah took fifty days, twenty days of which were spent in Tabuk and the others on the way to and fro. Tabuk Invasion was the last one made by the Prophet*.
The People Who lagged Behind
Due to its particular circumstances, this invasion was a peculiar severe trial provided by Allah only to try the believers’ Faith and sort them out of others. This is Allah’s permanent Will in such circumstances. In this respect He says: "Allah will not leave the believers in the state in which you are now, until He distinguishes the wicked from the good." [Al-Qur'an 3:179] Lagging and hanging back from full participation in that invasion amounted to the degree of hypocrisy. Whenever the Prophet* was informed of a man’s lingering, he would say: "Leave him alone! If Allah knows him to be good He will enable him to follow you; but if he were not so, Allah would relieve us of him." Nobody stayed behind except those who were either hindered by a serious excuse or the hypocrites who told lies to Allah and His Messenger.
Some of those hypocrites’ lingering was due to an excuse based on forgery and delusion. Some others tarried but didn’t ask for an instant permission. But there were three believers who unjustifiably lingered. They were the ones whom Allah tried their Faith, but later on He turned to them in mercy and accepted their repentance. As soon as the Prophet* had entered Medina, he prayed two Rak‘a then he sat to receive his people. The hypocrites who were over eighty men [Fath Al- Bari 8/119] came and offered various kinds of excuses and started swearing. The Prophet acknowledged their excuses and invoked Allah’s forgiveness for them but he entrusted their inner thoughts and Faith to Allah.
Destroying the Masjid of Dirar
From that time on, hypocrites were no longer treated leniently or even gently by the Muslims. Allah not only bade Muslims to treat them severely but He also forbade them to take their gift charities or perform prayer on their dead, or ask Allah’s forgiveness for them or even visit their tombs. Allah bade the Muslims to demolish the mosque, which they verily appointed and used as a hiding place where they might practise their plots, conspiracy and deceit. Some Qur’anic verses were sent down disclosing them publicly and utterly so that everybody in Medina got to know their reality.
The demolition or burning of Masjid al-Dirar, also referred to as the Mosque of Opposition, the Mosque of Dissent, or the Mosque of Harm is mentioned in the Qur'an. Masjid al-Dirar was a Medinian mosque that was erected close to the Quba' Mosque and which the Prophet* initially approved of but subsequently had destroyed while he was returning from the Battle of Tabuk (which occurred in October 630 AD).
The mosque was built by twelve disaffected men from the Ansar on the commands of Abu `Amir Ar-Rahib (the Monk); a Christian monk who refused Muhammad's invitation to Islam and instead fought along with the Meccan non-Muslims against Islam in the Battle of Uhud.
This man embraced Christianity before Islam and read the Scriptures. During the time of Jahiliyyah, Abu `Amir was known for being a worshipper and being a notable person among Al-Khazraj. When the Prophet* arrived at Al-Medina after the Hijrah, the Muslims gathered around him and the word of Islam was triumphant on the day of Badr, causing Abu `Amir, the cursed one, to choke on his own saliva and announce his enmity to Islam. He fled from Al-Medina to the idolators of Quraysh in Makkah to support them in the war against the Prophet* . The Quraysh united their forces and the bedouins who joined them for the battle of Uhud, during which Allah tested the Muslims, but the good end is always for the pious and righteous people. The rebellious Abu `Amir dug many holes in the ground between the two camps, into one of which the Messenger fell, injuring his face and breaking one of his right lower teeth. He also sustained a head injury. Before the fighting started, Abu `Amir approached his people among the Ansar and tried to convince them to support and agree with him. When they recognized him, they said, "May Allah never burden an eye by seeing you, O Fasiq one, O enemy of Allah!'' They cursed him and he went back declaring, "By Allah! Evil has touched my people after I left.'' The Prophet* called Abu `Amir to Allah and recited the Qur'an to him before his flight to Makkah, but he refused to embrace Islam and rebelled. The Messenger invoked Allah that Abu `Amir die as an outcast in an alien land, and his invocation came true. After the battle of Uhud was finished, Abu `Amir realized that the Messenger's call was still rising and gaining momentum, so he went to Heraclius, the emperor of Rome, asking for his aid against the Prophet . Heraclius gave him promises and Abu `Amir remained with him. He also wrote to several of his people in Al-Medina, who embraced hypocrisy, promising and insinuating to them that he will lead an army to fight the Prophet* to defeat him and his call. He ordered them to establish a stronghold where he could send his emissaries and to serve as an outpost when he joins them later on. These hypocrites built a Masjid next to the Masjid in Quba', and they finished building it before the Messenger went to Tabuk. They went to the Messenger inviting him to pray in their Masjid so that it would be a proof that the Messenger approved of their Masjid. They told him that they built the Masjid for the weak and ill persons on rainy nights. However, Allah prevented His Messenger from praying in that Masjid.
Abu 'Amir urged his men to establish a stronghold and prepare whatever they can of power and weapons as he promised and insinuated to them that he will lead an army, backed by Heraclius, to fight the Prophet* and his companions, and defeat his message by expelling him from Medina. The Prophet* prepared himself to go to the Mosque, before he was prevented by a revelation about the hypocrisy and ill design of the builders of the Mosque. The Prophet* and the companions believed they were Hypocrites (munafiqs) and had ulterior motives for building the Al-Dirar mosque. Thus he ordered his men to burn it down upon their return and Abu 'Amir was given the name Abu 'Amir al-Faasiq. When the Prophet* came back from Tabuk and was approximately one or two days away from Al-Medina, Jibril came down to him with the news about Masjid Ad-Dirar and the disbelief and division between the believers, who were in Masjid Quba' (which was built on piety from the first day), that Masjid Ad-Dirar was meant to achieve. Therefore, the Prophet* sent some people to Masjid Ad-Dirar to bring it down before he reached Al-Medina.
Main Topic: Belief ~ The Miraculous Qur’an
Scientific Miracles of the Quran
Many people have studies the Qur’an and pointed to statements which are written in the Qur’an that modern-day science has verified as being true. They point out (correctly) that an unlettered person living in the desert 1400 years ago could not have known these scientific truths. The main elements mentioned are the verses relating to the formation of the human embryo in the womb, and other scientific statements. Some of these are listed below (taken from a website: http://www.miraclesofthequran.com/scientific_index.html).
The skies with 'woven' orbits
The tsunami effect in the prophet moses’s parting of the sea
The sun will eventually expire
Modern-day radar technology
The contraction motion that facilitates birth
The solidity of the atom and electron orbits
A red rose in the sky: the rosette nebula
Bone loss in old age
The helio-centric system
The ozone layer at the poles as the sun rises
Heart massage
The cloning of living things
The sun will expire after some time
The pulling motion that facilitates birth
The expanding earth
Quasars and the gravitational lens effect
Scientific facts in the story of the flood of nuh
The earth’s gravitational force
Aerodynamic forces and the flight programmed in birds
The miracle of fire and wood, that cannot be obtained artificially
Radio receivers on mountains
The wisdom behind the prohibition of blood in the qur’an
Fossilization and iron content
The mother’s womb with its secure protection
The sun’s hydrogen and helium content
Oxidation in the blood
The quivering and swelling of the earth
The coming of the universe into existence
The expansion of the universe
The end of the universe and the big crunch
Creation from hot smoke
The splitting asunder of "the heavens and the earth"
The creation of what lies between the heavens and the earth
The perfect equilibrium in the universe
The fine tuning in the universe
The structural differences between the sun, the moon and the stars
Orbits and the rotating universe
The sun's trajectory
The moon's orbit
Calculating the lunar year
The force of gravity and orbital movements
The roundness of the earth
The earth's direction of rotation
The earth's geoid shape
The diameters of the earth and space
The layers of the atmosphere
The protected roof
The sky made a dome
The returning sky
The layers of the earth
The earth disgorges its charges
The function of mountains
The movement of mountains
Different points in the rising and setting of the sun
Land loss at the extremities
The splitting earth
The miracle of iron
The formation of petrol
The relativity of time
Creation in six days
The truth of destiny
Duality in creation
Sub-atomic particles
Black holes
Pulsars: pulsating stars
The star sirius
Light and dark
Combustion without fire
The weight of clouds
The proportion of rain
The formation of rain
Rains which bring a dead land back to life
The formation of hail, thunder and lightning
The fecundating winds
The stages of wind formation
How the process of photosynthesis begins in the morning
The seas not mingling with one another
Darkness in the seas and internal waves
The region that controls our movements
Hearts find peace in the remembrance of allah
Forgiveness according to the morals of islam and its benefits on health
How prayer accelerates the treatment of the sick
Stress and depression: the results of not abiding by the religion
The birth of a human being
The creation of human beings from water
Creation from clay
The programming in genes
The menstrual period
Pregnancy and birth
The sequence in development of human organs
The formation of milk
Miraculous mixture: mother's milk
The identity in the fingerprint
The female honey bee
The miracle of honey
The date and its uses as described in the qur'an
The fig: a fruit whose perfection has only recently been revealed
Fish: a valuable source of nutrition
Pork and its harmful effects on health
The olive: a health-giving plant
Coronary by-pass surgery
Health benefits of movement, washing and drinking water
The existence of microscopic life
The existence of animal societies
Biomimetics: drawing inspiration from the design in living things
Locusts moving in swarms
Ant communication
The food cycle
The ears are active during sleep
The importance of movement in sleep
Reduced movement at night
Chest contraction with increasing height
Caution about scientific interpretations
However, a note of caution ~ many statements are vague and open to interpretation. Also, we know that scientific theory can change from age to age and will this invalidate the miraculous nature of the Qur’an? Theories are only theories, and the true miraculous nature of the Qur’an is its use of the Arabic language:
Literary Miracle of the Qur’an
“Read in the Name of your Lord” [TMQ]. These were the first few words of the Qur’an revealed to the Prophet Muhammad* over fourteen hundred years ago. Muhammad, who was known to have been in retreat and meditation in a cave outside Mecca, had received the first few words of a book that would have a tremendous impact on the world of Arabic literature. Not being known to have composed any piece of poetry and not having any special rhetorical gifts, Muhammad had just received the beginning of a book that would deal with matters of belief, law, politics, ritual, spirituality, and economics in an ‘entirely new literary form’. This unique literary form was the cause of the dramatic intellectual revival of desert Arabs, and after thirteen years of the first revelation, it became the only reference for a new state in Medina. This new form of speech, the Qur’an, became the sole source of the new civilisation’s political, philosophical, and spiritual outlook.
The Qur’an’s Challenge
The unique literary form forms the backdrop to the doctrine of I’jaz al-Quran, the inimitability of the Qur’an, which lies at the heart of the Qur’an’s claim to being of divine origin. The Qur’an states, “If you are in doubt of what We have revealed to Our messenger, then produce one chapter like it. Call upon all your helpers, besides Allah, if you are truthful”; and “Or do they say he fabricated the message? Nay, they have no faith. Let them produce a recital like it, if they speak the truth.”
According Qur’anic experts these verses issue a challenge to produce a chapter (surah) that imitates the Qur’an’s unique literary form. The tools needed to meet this challenge are the finite grammatical rules and the twenty eight letters that make-up the Arabic language; these are independent and objective measures available to all. The fact that it has not been matched since it emerged to this day does not surprise most scholars familiar with the Arabic language and that of the Qur’an.
The inability of any person to produce anything like the Qur’an, due to its unique literary form, is the essence of the Qur’anic miracle. A miracle is defined as “events which lie outside the productive capacity of nature”. The argument posed by Muslim Theologians and Philosophers is that if, with the finite set of Arabic linguistic tools at humanity’s disposal, there is no effective challenge; then providing a naturalistic explanation for the Qur’an’s uniqueness is incoherent and doesn’t explain its inimitability. This is because the natural capacity of the text producer, or author, is able to produce the known literary forms in the Arabic language. The development of an entirely unique literary form is beyond the scope of the productive nature any author, hence a supernatural entity, God, is the only sufficient comprehensive explanation.
The Arabic Qur’an
The uniqueness of the Qur’an lies in its use of the Arabic language – which was at its peak at the time of revelation – at the time of the Prophet*. The Arabs felt that they had reached the pinnacle of excellence for the language when Allah then sent the Qur’an – which dumbfounded the experts of Arabic language. We can get technical about the miracles (I’jaz) of the Qur’an but to put it in a simplistic way – the Arabic language has three main components: Grammar (syntax), Poetry (Style) and Meaning. These don’t all co-exist at their purest forms as only two can exist whilst sacrificing the third domain. Only the Qur’an has been able to synthesise these three elements Grammar (syntax), Poetry (Style) and Meaning in a written form. The challenge for any doubters is to study Arabic and disprove the rules of Arabic and the Qur’anic approach. It is possible to get more technical about this – but one needs to know Arabic to discuss these technical aspects of the miracle – outside the scope of our Study Circle! We will, however, touch on some aspects of this shortly, I/A.
Children’s Feedback:
Charity Event about the Rohingya Muslims being persecuted in Burma
99 Names of Allah
News Topic
Nil
HomeworkSeerah ~ Read the story (Hadith) of Ka'b ibn Malik and his experience of the Battle of Tabuk. What can you learn from this?
Belief ~ Who could have possibly wrote (authored) the Qur'an at the time of the Prophet?
Summary
Seerah: Battle of Tabuk Return Journey
The Army of Islam at Tabuk and 'Abd ar-Rahman ibn 'Awf leads the Prophet* in prayer
No-Show from the Romans at Tabuk so The Prophet* consolidates the Islamic State through treaties with the Christian Kings (agreeing to pay JIZYA)
Khalid bin Al-Waleed captures the King ‘Ukaidir who was hunting Bulls
Returning to Medina from Tabuk - Hadhaifa disrupts a plot to kill the Prophet*
The People Who lagged Behind made their excuses to the Prophet*
Destroying the Masjid of Dirar as Abu 'Amir al-Faasiq wanted to have a base to fight against Islam and the mosque provided a good cover for this. Allah revealed their plot.
Belief: The Miraculous Qur’an
Many claimed scientific miracles in the Qur’an
Qur’anic statements about the embryos
Limits of purely scientific interpretations as theory can change, unless established truth
Literary Miracle of the Qur’an (Qur’an’s Challenge)
Only the Qur’an has been able to synthesise these three elements Grammar (syntax), Poetry (Style) and Meaning in a written form
Seerah of Muhammed*
*: May the peace blessings and Mercy of Allah be upon him
TMQ: Translation to the nearest meaning of the Qur’an
The Army of Islam at Tabuk
During the northward march it happened one day at dawn that the Prophet was delayed in making his ablution. The men were in lines for the prayers and they waited for him until they feared that the sun would rise before they had prayed. Then it was agreed that 'Abd ar-Rahman ibn 'Awf should lead them, and they had already prayed one of the two prayer cycles when the Prophet appeared. 'Abd ar-Rahman was about to draw back, but the Prophet motioned him to remain where he was, and he himself joined the congregation. When they had uttered the greeting of Peace which ends the prayer the Prophet rose and prayed the cycle he had missed. When he had finished he said: "Ye have done well, for verily a Prophet doesn’t die until he hath been led in prayer by a pious man of his people."
Arriving at Tabuk and camping there, the Muslim army was ready to face the enemy. There, the Prophet* delivered an eloquent speech that included the most inclusive words. In that speech he urged the Muslims to seek the welfare of this world and the world to come. He warned and cherished them and gave them good tidings. By doing that he cherished those who were broken in spirits, and blocked up the gap of shortage and mess they were suffering from due to lack of supplies, food and other substances.
No-Show from the Romans at Tabuk so The Prophet* consolidates the Islamic State through treaties with the Christian Kings (agreeing to pay JIZYA)
Upon learning of the Muslims’ march, the Byzantines and their allies were so terrified that none of them dared set out to fight. On the contrary they scattered inside their territory. It brought, in itself, a good credit to the Muslim forces. That had gained military reputation in the mid and remote lands of Arabian Peninsula. The great and serious political profits that the Muslim forces had obtained, were far better than the ones they could have acquired if the two armies had been engaged in military confrontation. The Head of Ailah, Yahna bin Rawbah came to the Prophet*, made peace with him and paid him the tribute (Al- Jizya). Both of Jarba’ and Adhruh peoples paid him tribute, as well. So the Prophet* gave each a guarantee letter, similar to Yahna’s, in which he says: "In the Name of Allah, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful. This is a guarantee of protection from Allah and Muhammad the Prophet, the Messenger of Allah, to Yahna bin Rawbah and the people of Ailah; their ships, their caravans on land and sea shall have the custody of Allah and the Prophet Muhammad, he and whosoever are with him of Ash-Sham people and those of the sea. Whosoever contravenes this treaty, his wealth shall not save him; it shall be the fair prize of him that takes it. Now it should not be lawful to hinder the men from any springs which they have been in the habit of frequenting, nor from any journeys they desire to make, whether by sea or by land."
The Prophet* dispatched Khalid bin Al-Waleed at the head of four hundred and fifty horsemen to ‘Ukaidir Dumat Al-Jandal and said to him: "You will see him hunting oryxes." So when Khalid drew near his castle and was as far as an eye-sight range, he saw the oryxes coming out rubbing their horns against the castle gate. As it was a moony night Khalid could see Ukaidir come out to hunt them, so he captured him — though he was surrounded by his men — and brought him back to the Prophet*, who spared his life and made peace with him for the payment of two thousand camels, eight hundred heads of cattle, four hundred armours and four hundred lances. He obliged him to recognize the duty of paying tribute and charged him with collecting it from Dumat, Tabuk, Ailah and Taima’.
The tribes, who used to ally the Byzantines, became quite certain that their dependence on their former masters came to an end. Therefore they turned into being pro-Muslims. The Islamic state had therefore enlarged its borders to an extent that it, touched the Byzantines’ and their agents’ borders. So we see that the Byzantine agents role was over.
Returning to Medina from Tabuk
The Muslim army returned from Tabuk victoriously, undeceived or wronged. That was because Allah had sufficed them the evils of fight. On the way back and at a mountain road, twelve hypocrites sought the Prophet’s life and that was while he was passing along that mountain road with only Ammar holding the rein of his she-camel and Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman driving it, at the time that people had already gone down into the bottom of the valley. The hypocrites seized that opportunity to seek the Prophet’s life. As the Prophet* and his two companions were moving along, they heard thrusts of people coming towards him from behind with their faces veiled. Hudhaifa, who was sent by the Prophet to see what was going on, saw them and stroke their mounts’ faces with a crook in his hand and Allah cast fear into their hearts. They fled away and overtook their people. However, Hudhaifa named them to the Prophet* and informed him of their intentions. So that was why Hudhaifa was called the "confidant" of the Prophet*. About this event Allah, the Exalted says: "And they resolved that (plot to murder Muhammad) which they were unable to carry out." [Al-Qur'an 9:74]
When his headquarters, Medina, began to loom at the horizon, the Prophet [pbuh] said: "This is a cheerful sight. This is Uhud, which is a mountain, we like it and it likes us." When the Medinese learnt of their arrival they set out to meet the army. Women, youths, youngsters and small children went out of town to celebrate their home-return wholeheartedly singing: "The full moon shone down upon us, through the traits of Al-Wada‘ Mountain. Thanks is due to us, as long as a supplicator invokes to Allah.."
The Prophet*’s march to Tabuk was in Rajab and his return in Ramadan. So we see that this Ghazwah took fifty days, twenty days of which were spent in Tabuk and the others on the way to and fro. Tabuk Invasion was the last one made by the Prophet*.
The People Who lagged Behind
Due to its particular circumstances, this invasion was a peculiar severe trial provided by Allah only to try the believers’ Faith and sort them out of others. This is Allah’s permanent Will in such circumstances. In this respect He says: "Allah will not leave the believers in the state in which you are now, until He distinguishes the wicked from the good." [Al-Qur'an 3:179] Lagging and hanging back from full participation in that invasion amounted to the degree of hypocrisy. Whenever the Prophet* was informed of a man’s lingering, he would say: "Leave him alone! If Allah knows him to be good He will enable him to follow you; but if he were not so, Allah would relieve us of him." Nobody stayed behind except those who were either hindered by a serious excuse or the hypocrites who told lies to Allah and His Messenger.
Some of those hypocrites’ lingering was due to an excuse based on forgery and delusion. Some others tarried but didn’t ask for an instant permission. But there were three believers who unjustifiably lingered. They were the ones whom Allah tried their Faith, but later on He turned to them in mercy and accepted their repentance. As soon as the Prophet* had entered Medina, he prayed two Rak‘a then he sat to receive his people. The hypocrites who were over eighty men [Fath Al- Bari 8/119] came and offered various kinds of excuses and started swearing. The Prophet acknowledged their excuses and invoked Allah’s forgiveness for them but he entrusted their inner thoughts and Faith to Allah.
Destroying the Masjid of Dirar
From that time on, hypocrites were no longer treated leniently or even gently by the Muslims. Allah not only bade Muslims to treat them severely but He also forbade them to take their gift charities or perform prayer on their dead, or ask Allah’s forgiveness for them or even visit their tombs. Allah bade the Muslims to demolish the mosque, which they verily appointed and used as a hiding place where they might practise their plots, conspiracy and deceit. Some Qur’anic verses were sent down disclosing them publicly and utterly so that everybody in Medina got to know their reality.
The demolition or burning of Masjid al-Dirar, also referred to as the Mosque of Opposition, the Mosque of Dissent, or the Mosque of Harm is mentioned in the Qur'an. Masjid al-Dirar was a Medinian mosque that was erected close to the Quba' Mosque and which the Prophet* initially approved of but subsequently had destroyed while he was returning from the Battle of Tabuk (which occurred in October 630 AD).
The mosque was built by twelve disaffected men from the Ansar on the commands of Abu `Amir Ar-Rahib (the Monk); a Christian monk who refused Muhammad's invitation to Islam and instead fought along with the Meccan non-Muslims against Islam in the Battle of Uhud.
This man embraced Christianity before Islam and read the Scriptures. During the time of Jahiliyyah, Abu `Amir was known for being a worshipper and being a notable person among Al-Khazraj. When the Prophet* arrived at Al-Medina after the Hijrah, the Muslims gathered around him and the word of Islam was triumphant on the day of Badr, causing Abu `Amir, the cursed one, to choke on his own saliva and announce his enmity to Islam. He fled from Al-Medina to the idolators of Quraysh in Makkah to support them in the war against the Prophet* . The Quraysh united their forces and the bedouins who joined them for the battle of Uhud, during which Allah tested the Muslims, but the good end is always for the pious and righteous people. The rebellious Abu `Amir dug many holes in the ground between the two camps, into one of which the Messenger fell, injuring his face and breaking one of his right lower teeth. He also sustained a head injury. Before the fighting started, Abu `Amir approached his people among the Ansar and tried to convince them to support and agree with him. When they recognized him, they said, "May Allah never burden an eye by seeing you, O Fasiq one, O enemy of Allah!'' They cursed him and he went back declaring, "By Allah! Evil has touched my people after I left.'' The Prophet* called Abu `Amir to Allah and recited the Qur'an to him before his flight to Makkah, but he refused to embrace Islam and rebelled. The Messenger invoked Allah that Abu `Amir die as an outcast in an alien land, and his invocation came true. After the battle of Uhud was finished, Abu `Amir realized that the Messenger's call was still rising and gaining momentum, so he went to Heraclius, the emperor of Rome, asking for his aid against the Prophet . Heraclius gave him promises and Abu `Amir remained with him. He also wrote to several of his people in Al-Medina, who embraced hypocrisy, promising and insinuating to them that he will lead an army to fight the Prophet* to defeat him and his call. He ordered them to establish a stronghold where he could send his emissaries and to serve as an outpost when he joins them later on. These hypocrites built a Masjid next to the Masjid in Quba', and they finished building it before the Messenger went to Tabuk. They went to the Messenger inviting him to pray in their Masjid so that it would be a proof that the Messenger approved of their Masjid. They told him that they built the Masjid for the weak and ill persons on rainy nights. However, Allah prevented His Messenger from praying in that Masjid.
Abu 'Amir urged his men to establish a stronghold and prepare whatever they can of power and weapons as he promised and insinuated to them that he will lead an army, backed by Heraclius, to fight the Prophet* and his companions, and defeat his message by expelling him from Medina. The Prophet* prepared himself to go to the Mosque, before he was prevented by a revelation about the hypocrisy and ill design of the builders of the Mosque. The Prophet* and the companions believed they were Hypocrites (munafiqs) and had ulterior motives for building the Al-Dirar mosque. Thus he ordered his men to burn it down upon their return and Abu 'Amir was given the name Abu 'Amir al-Faasiq. When the Prophet* came back from Tabuk and was approximately one or two days away from Al-Medina, Jibril came down to him with the news about Masjid Ad-Dirar and the disbelief and division between the believers, who were in Masjid Quba' (which was built on piety from the first day), that Masjid Ad-Dirar was meant to achieve. Therefore, the Prophet* sent some people to Masjid Ad-Dirar to bring it down before he reached Al-Medina.
Main Topic: Belief ~ The Miraculous Qur’an
Scientific Miracles of the Quran
Many people have studies the Qur’an and pointed to statements which are written in the Qur’an that modern-day science has verified as being true. They point out (correctly) that an unlettered person living in the desert 1400 years ago could not have known these scientific truths. The main elements mentioned are the verses relating to the formation of the human embryo in the womb, and other scientific statements. Some of these are listed below (taken from a website: http://www.miraclesofthequran.com/scientific_index.html).
The skies with 'woven' orbits
The tsunami effect in the prophet moses’s parting of the sea
The sun will eventually expire
Modern-day radar technology
The contraction motion that facilitates birth
The solidity of the atom and electron orbits
A red rose in the sky: the rosette nebula
Bone loss in old age
The helio-centric system
The ozone layer at the poles as the sun rises
Heart massage
The cloning of living things
The sun will expire after some time
The pulling motion that facilitates birth
The expanding earth
Quasars and the gravitational lens effect
Scientific facts in the story of the flood of nuh
The earth’s gravitational force
Aerodynamic forces and the flight programmed in birds
The miracle of fire and wood, that cannot be obtained artificially
Radio receivers on mountains
The wisdom behind the prohibition of blood in the qur’an
Fossilization and iron content
The mother’s womb with its secure protection
The sun’s hydrogen and helium content
Oxidation in the blood
The quivering and swelling of the earth
The coming of the universe into existence
The expansion of the universe
The end of the universe and the big crunch
Creation from hot smoke
The splitting asunder of "the heavens and the earth"
The creation of what lies between the heavens and the earth
The perfect equilibrium in the universe
The fine tuning in the universe
The structural differences between the sun, the moon and the stars
Orbits and the rotating universe
The sun's trajectory
The moon's orbit
Calculating the lunar year
The force of gravity and orbital movements
The roundness of the earth
The earth's direction of rotation
The earth's geoid shape
The diameters of the earth and space
The layers of the atmosphere
The protected roof
The sky made a dome
The returning sky
The layers of the earth
The earth disgorges its charges
The function of mountains
The movement of mountains
Different points in the rising and setting of the sun
Land loss at the extremities
The splitting earth
The miracle of iron
The formation of petrol
The relativity of time
Creation in six days
The truth of destiny
Duality in creation
Sub-atomic particles
Black holes
Pulsars: pulsating stars
The star sirius
Light and dark
Combustion without fire
The weight of clouds
The proportion of rain
The formation of rain
Rains which bring a dead land back to life
The formation of hail, thunder and lightning
The fecundating winds
The stages of wind formation
How the process of photosynthesis begins in the morning
The seas not mingling with one another
Darkness in the seas and internal waves
The region that controls our movements
Hearts find peace in the remembrance of allah
Forgiveness according to the morals of islam and its benefits on health
How prayer accelerates the treatment of the sick
Stress and depression: the results of not abiding by the religion
The birth of a human being
The creation of human beings from water
Creation from clay
The programming in genes
The menstrual period
Pregnancy and birth
The sequence in development of human organs
The formation of milk
Miraculous mixture: mother's milk
The identity in the fingerprint
The female honey bee
The miracle of honey
The date and its uses as described in the qur'an
The fig: a fruit whose perfection has only recently been revealed
Fish: a valuable source of nutrition
Pork and its harmful effects on health
The olive: a health-giving plant
Coronary by-pass surgery
Health benefits of movement, washing and drinking water
The existence of microscopic life
The existence of animal societies
Biomimetics: drawing inspiration from the design in living things
Locusts moving in swarms
Ant communication
The food cycle
The ears are active during sleep
The importance of movement in sleep
Reduced movement at night
Chest contraction with increasing height
Caution about scientific interpretations
However, a note of caution ~ many statements are vague and open to interpretation. Also, we know that scientific theory can change from age to age and will this invalidate the miraculous nature of the Qur’an? Theories are only theories, and the true miraculous nature of the Qur’an is its use of the Arabic language:
Literary Miracle of the Qur’an
“Read in the Name of your Lord” [TMQ]. These were the first few words of the Qur’an revealed to the Prophet Muhammad* over fourteen hundred years ago. Muhammad, who was known to have been in retreat and meditation in a cave outside Mecca, had received the first few words of a book that would have a tremendous impact on the world of Arabic literature. Not being known to have composed any piece of poetry and not having any special rhetorical gifts, Muhammad had just received the beginning of a book that would deal with matters of belief, law, politics, ritual, spirituality, and economics in an ‘entirely new literary form’. This unique literary form was the cause of the dramatic intellectual revival of desert Arabs, and after thirteen years of the first revelation, it became the only reference for a new state in Medina. This new form of speech, the Qur’an, became the sole source of the new civilisation’s political, philosophical, and spiritual outlook.
The Qur’an’s Challenge
The unique literary form forms the backdrop to the doctrine of I’jaz al-Quran, the inimitability of the Qur’an, which lies at the heart of the Qur’an’s claim to being of divine origin. The Qur’an states, “If you are in doubt of what We have revealed to Our messenger, then produce one chapter like it. Call upon all your helpers, besides Allah, if you are truthful”; and “Or do they say he fabricated the message? Nay, they have no faith. Let them produce a recital like it, if they speak the truth.”
According Qur’anic experts these verses issue a challenge to produce a chapter (surah) that imitates the Qur’an’s unique literary form. The tools needed to meet this challenge are the finite grammatical rules and the twenty eight letters that make-up the Arabic language; these are independent and objective measures available to all. The fact that it has not been matched since it emerged to this day does not surprise most scholars familiar with the Arabic language and that of the Qur’an.
The inability of any person to produce anything like the Qur’an, due to its unique literary form, is the essence of the Qur’anic miracle. A miracle is defined as “events which lie outside the productive capacity of nature”. The argument posed by Muslim Theologians and Philosophers is that if, with the finite set of Arabic linguistic tools at humanity’s disposal, there is no effective challenge; then providing a naturalistic explanation for the Qur’an’s uniqueness is incoherent and doesn’t explain its inimitability. This is because the natural capacity of the text producer, or author, is able to produce the known literary forms in the Arabic language. The development of an entirely unique literary form is beyond the scope of the productive nature any author, hence a supernatural entity, God, is the only sufficient comprehensive explanation.
The Arabic Qur’an
The uniqueness of the Qur’an lies in its use of the Arabic language – which was at its peak at the time of revelation – at the time of the Prophet*. The Arabs felt that they had reached the pinnacle of excellence for the language when Allah then sent the Qur’an – which dumbfounded the experts of Arabic language. We can get technical about the miracles (I’jaz) of the Qur’an but to put it in a simplistic way – the Arabic language has three main components: Grammar (syntax), Poetry (Style) and Meaning. These don’t all co-exist at their purest forms as only two can exist whilst sacrificing the third domain. Only the Qur’an has been able to synthesise these three elements Grammar (syntax), Poetry (Style) and Meaning in a written form. The challenge for any doubters is to study Arabic and disprove the rules of Arabic and the Qur’anic approach. It is possible to get more technical about this – but one needs to know Arabic to discuss these technical aspects of the miracle – outside the scope of our Study Circle! We will, however, touch on some aspects of this shortly, I/A.
Children’s Feedback:
Charity Event about the Rohingya Muslims being persecuted in Burma
99 Names of Allah
News Topic
Nil
HomeworkSeerah ~ Read the story (Hadith) of Ka'b ibn Malik and his experience of the Battle of Tabuk. What can you learn from this?
Belief ~ Who could have possibly wrote (authored) the Qur'an at the time of the Prophet?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)